Abstract
The tea mosquito bug Helopeltis theivora (Waterhouse) is an important economic pest of tea in India. The development of resistance in H. theivora populations obtained from a conventional plantation and an organic plantation was studied in the laboratory for five generations, and associated changes in life cycle traits were assessed. Selection using sub-lethal concentrations of endosulphan resulted in a 4.4-fold increase in insecticide resistance ratio from the F1 to the F5 generation in the H. theivora population from the conventional plantation. By the F5 generation, nymphal duration was higher and fecundity was lower in the endosulphan-selected strain than in the non-selected strain from a conventional plantation and the susceptible strain from an organic plantation. These findings have practical implications for insecticide resistance management of this important sucking pest of tea.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barbora B. C. and Biswas A. K. (1996) Use pattern of pesticides in tea estates of North East India. Two and a Bud 47, 19–21.
Bhatia S. K. and Pradhan S. (1968) Studies on resistance to insecticides in Tribolium castaneum (Herbst.). I. Selection of a strain resistant to p,p’ DDT and its biological characteristics. Indian Journal of Entomology 30, 13–32.
Bhatia S. K. and Pradhan S. (1971) Studies on resistance to insecticides in Tribolium castaneum (Herbst.) III. Selection of a strain resistant to lindane and its biological characteristics. Journal of Stored Products Research 7, 331–337.
Bora S., Sarmah M., Rahaman A. and Gurusubramanian G. (2007) Relative toxicity of pyrethroid and nonpyrethroid insecticides against male and female tea mosquito bug Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse (Darjeeling strain). Journal of Entomological Research 31, 37–41.
Campanhola C., Mccutchen B. F., Baehrecke E. H. and Plapp F. W. (1991) Biological constraints associated with resistance to pyrethroids in tobacco bud worm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 84, 1404–1411.
Dzolkhifli O., Khoo K. C., Muhamad R. and Ho C. T. (1986) Preliminary study of resistance in four populations of Helopeltis theobromae Miller (Hemiptera: Miridae) to g-HCH, propoxur and dioxacarb, pp. 317–323. In Cocoa and Coconuts: Progress and Outlook. Incorporated Society of Planters, Kuala Lumpur.
FAO (1980) Recommended methods for measurement of pest resistance to pesticides, Plant Production and Protection Paper 21. FAO, Rome. pp. 1–132.
Finney D. T. (1971) Probit Analysis. Cambridge University Press, London. 333 pp.
Forrester N. M., Cahill M., Bird L. G. and Layland J. K. (1993) Management of pyrethroid and endosulfan resistance in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Australia. Bulletin of Entomological Research 1, 1–32.
Glenn D. C., Hoffman A. A. and McDonald G. (1994) Resistance to pyrethroids in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from corn: adult resistance, larval resistance and fitness effects. Journal of Economic Entomology 87, 1165–1171.
Gope B. and Handique R. (1991) Bio-ecological studies on the tea mosquito bug Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse in North-East India. Two and a Bud 38, 21–27.
Gurusubramanian G. and Bora S.(2007) Relative toxicity of some commonly used insecticides against adults of Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse (Hemiptera: Miridae) collected from Jorhat area tea plantations, South Assam, India. Resistance Pest Management Newsletter 17, 8–12.
Ho C. T. (1994) Further investigations on the development of insecticide resistance in Helopeltis theivora (Heteroptera: Miridae) from cocoa estates of Peninsular Malaysia. The Planter 70, 207–217.
Kumar S. and Kumar J. (1997) Comparative biology of resistant and susceptible strains of Epilachna vigintioctopunctata (F) to malathion and endosulfan. Journal of Entomological Research 21, 303–306.
Leeper J. R., Rough R. T. and Reynolds H. T. (1986) Preventing or managing resistance in arthropods, pp. 345–346. In Pesticide Resistance: Strategies and Tactics for Management (edited by G. P. Georghiou). National Research Council, National Press, Washington, DC.
Liew V. K., Dzolkhifli O. and Muhamad R. (1992) Susceptibility of Helopeltis theobromae Collected from Sg. Tekam to Three Insecticides. Paper presented at: Pesticides in Perspective, pp. 28–29 April 1992. Malaysian Agricultural Chemicals Association, Kuala Lumpur.
Muhamed R. and Omar D. (1997) Susceptibility of the cocoa mirid, Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse, to g-HCH, cypermethrin and deltamethrin. Resistance Pest Management Newsletter 9, 34–37.
Price W. P. (1974) Energy allocation in ephemeral adult insects. The Ohio Journal of Science 74, 380–387.
Ribeiro S., Sousa J. P., Nogueira A. J. and Soares A. M. V. M. (2001) Effect of endosulfan and parathion on energy reserves and physiological parameters of the terrestrial isopod Porcellio dilatatus. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 49, 131–138.
Robertson J. L. and Preisler H. K. (1991) Pesticide Bioassays with Arthropods. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL. 127 pp.
Robertson J. L., Smith K. C., Savin N. E. and Lavigne R. J. (1984) Effects of dose selection and sample size on the precision of lethal dose estimates in dose-mortality regression. Journal ofEconomic Entomology 77, 833–837.
Roy S., Gurusubramanian G. and Mukhopadhyay A. (2008a) Insecticide persistence and residual toxicity monitoring in tea mosquito bug Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse (Heteroptera: Hemiptera: Miridae) in Dooars, West Bengal. Resistance Pest Management Newsletter 17, 9–15.
Roy S., Mukhopadhyay A. and Gurusubramanian G. (2008b) Use pattern of insecticides in tea estates of the Dooars in North Bengal, India. North Bengal University Journal of Animal Science 2, 35–40.
Sarker M. and Mukhopadhyay A. (2003) Expression of esterases in different tissues of the tea pest, Helopeltis theivora exposed and unexposed to synthetic pesticide sprays from Darjeeling foothills and plains. Two and a Bud 50, 28–30.
Sarker M. and Mukhopadhyay A. (2006a) Studies on some enzymes related to insecticide resistance in Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae) from Darjeeling foothills and plains. Journal of Plantation Crops 34, 423–428.
Sarker M. and Mukhopadhyay A. (2006b) Studies on salivary and midgut enzymes of a major sucking pest of tea Helopeltis theivora (Heteroptera: Miridae) from Darjeeling plains, India. Journal of Entomological Research Society 8, 27–36.
Saxena J. D. and Bhatia S. K. (1980) Reduction in fecundity of Tribolium castaneum (Herbst.) due to fumigation and phosphine resistance. Indian Journal of Entomology 42, 796–798.
Senapati B. and Satpathi J. M. (1981) Comparative biology of malathion and carbaryl resistant and non resistant strains of Epilachna sparsa (Herbst.). Journal of Entomological Research 5, 157–162.
Xia R. X., Jun H. Z., Chang W., Ren X. X., Han Z. J. and Wang Y. C. (2001) Biological fitness of monocrotophos-resistant and susceptible strains of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). Journal Nanzing Agriculture University 24, 41–44.
Yaqoob M. and Arora R. K. (2005) Development of resistance in Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) to endosulfan in Jammu and comparative biology of its resistant, parental and susceptible strains. Resistant Pest Management Newsletter 14, 10–13.
Yaqoob M., Arora R. K. and Gupta R. K. (2006) Estimation of resistance in Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) to carbaryl and its effect on biology. Resistant Pest Management Newsletter 16, 29–32.
Yamada K., Tanaka T., Fahnoy A. R. and Miyata T. (1993) Laboratory evaluation of the biological fitness of chlorofluazuron resistant and susceptible strains from the same origin of diamond back moth, Plutella xylostella. Applied Entomology and Zoology 28, 396–399.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roy, S., Mukhopadhyay, A. & Gurusubramanian, G. Development of resistance to endosulphan in populations of the tea mosquito bug Helopeltis theivora (Heteroptera: Miridae) from organic and conventional tea plantations in India. Int J Trop Insect Sci 30, 61–66 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758410000081
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758410000081