Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Morphological and biochemical factors associated with resistance to Maruca vitrata (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in short-duration pigeonpea

  • Published:
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The spotted pod borer Maruca vitrata (Geyer) is known for its economic importance throughout its geographical distribution because of its destructive nature to reproductive parts of several grain legume crops including pigeonpea. In view of the importance of the pest, the present study was carried out on the association of different morpho-chemical traits with resistance/susceptibility to M. vitrata at the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India. Trichome length and density, sugars, proteins and phenols were found to be associated with resistance to M. vitrata in short-duration pigeonpea genotypes. Pod damage by M. vitrata on different short-duration pigeonpea genotypes in the field ranged from 5.8 to 68%. Laboratory studies showed less consumption of food and reduced larval and pupal weights of M. vitrata when reared on the resistant genotypes ICPL 98003 and ICPL 98008 indicating antibiosis effects of the genotypes. Trichome density on upper and lower surfaces of the leaf (390 and 452/9 mm ), and length (3.5 mm) and trichome density (442/9 mm2) and length (5.9 mm) on pods were found positively correlated with the resistant genotype ICPL 98003. High sugar content in flowers (22%) and pods (10.6%) was responsible for the susceptibility of ICPL 88034, while high phenol concentration in flowers (6.5%) and pods (9.3%) in ICPL 98003 was responsible for resistance. Protein content in pods was significantly higher (25.5%) in susceptible ICPL 88034 when compared with resistant ICPL 98003 (16.5%). Based on these results, ICPL 98003 and ICPL 98008 were categorized as highly resistant and ICPL 98012 as moderately resistant. This paper discusses the physico-chemical traits associated with resistance to M. vitrata in short-duration pigeonpea genotypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anitha Kumari D. (2005) Mechanisms of resistance to Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Mill). PhD thesis submitted to Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armes N. J., Wightman J. A., Jadhav D. R. and Ranga Rao G. V. (1997) Status of insecticidal resistance in Spodoptera in Andhra Pradesh, India. Pesticide Science 50, 240–248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bindra O. S. and Jokhmola S. S. (1967) Incidence and losses caused by some pod infesting insects in different varieties of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 37, 117–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooker R. H. (1965) Pests of cowpea in northern Nigeria. Bulletin of Entomological Research 55, 663–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dina S. O. (1979) Synthetic pyrethroids for the control of cowpea insect pests. Journal of Agricultural Science 93, 735–747.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dina S. O. (1988) Timing the application of deltamethrin and Cypermethrin for the control of insect pests of cowpea Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Tropical Pest Management 34, 65–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durairaj C. and Shanower T. G. (2003) Reaction of eight short duration pigeonpea genotypes against pod borer complex in Tamil Nadu, India. International Chickpea and Pigeonpea Newsletter No. 10, 47–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellow R. W., Subasinghe S. M. C. and Amarsena J. (1977) Reassessment of insect pest problems on pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan). Tropical Agriculturist 83, 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICRISAT [International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics] (1992) The medium term plan. Patancheru 502324, Andhra Pradesh, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa S., Hirao T. and Arai N. (1969) Chemo-sensory basis of host plant selection in the silkworm. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 12, 544–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackai L. E. N. (1982) A field screening technique for resistance of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) to the pod borer Maruca testulalis (Geyer) (Lepidoptera: Pyrali-dae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 72, 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackai L. E. N. (1991) Laboratory and screenhouse assays for evaluating cowpea resistance to the legume pod borer. Crop Protection 10, 48–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackai L. E. N. and Oghiakhe S. (1989) Pod wall trichomes and resistance of two wild cowpea, Vigna vexillata accessions to Maruca testulalis (Geyer) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and Clavigralla tomentosicollis St⇘l (Hemi-ptera: Coreidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 79, 595–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lateef S. S. and Reed W. (1981) Development of methodology for open field screening for insect resistance in pigeonpea, pp. 315–322. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Pigeonpea, Vol. 2, 15–19 December 1980 (Edited by Y. L. Nene). International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfoy C. A., Dabrowski Z. T. and Okech S. (1983) Studies on the legume pod borer, Maruca testulalis (Geyer)—4. Cowpea resistance to oviposition and larval feeding. Insect Science and Its Application 4, 147–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murkute G. R., Dhage A. R., Desai B. B., Kale A. A., Mote U. N. and Aher R. P. (1993) Biochemical parameters associated with pod borer damage as influenced by maturity group and growth stages of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Mill). Legume Research 16, 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochieng R. S., Okeyo-Owuor J. B. and Dabrowski Z. T. (1981) Studies on the legume pod borer, Maruca testulalis (Geyer). Mass rearing on natural food. Insect Science and Its Application 1, 269–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oghiakhe S., Jackai L. E. N. and Makanjuola W. A. (1991) Cowpea plant architecture in relation to infestation and damage by the legume pod-borer, Maruca testulalis (Geyer) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): effect of canopy structure and pod position. Insect Science and Its Application 12, 193–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter J. A. (1995) Pigeonpea trichomes a promising source for pod borer resistance. IPM and IRM News Letter for Legume Crops in Asia No. 2, pp. 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranga Rao G. V., Ashwini Kumari P. R., Rameswar Rao V. and Reddy Y. V. R. (2007) Evaluation of Spinosad and Indoxacarb for the management of legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Geyer), in pigeonpea. Journal of Food Legumes 20, 126–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese J. C. (1979) Interactions of allelochemicals with nutrients in herbivore food, pp. 309–330. In Herbivores: Their Interaction with Secondary Plant Metabolites (Edited by G. A. Rosenthal and D. H. Jazen). Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadasivam S. and Manikkam A. (1996) Biochemical Methods, 2nd Edition. New Age International (P) Limited Publisher, New Delhi. pp. 20–21, 193–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo B. K., Patnaik H. P. and Mishra B. K. (2002) Field screening of early maturing pigeonpea cultivars against the pod borers in Orissa. Indian Journal of Plant Protection 30, 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena K. B., Lateef S. S., Ariyattne H. P., Fonseka H. H. D. and Dharmasena C. M. D. (1996) Maruca testulalis damage in determinate and indeterminate lines of pigeonpea. International Pigeonpea Newsletter 3, 91–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanower T. G., Romies J. and Peter A. J. (1996) Pigeonpea plant trichomes: multitrophic level interactions, pp. 76–88. In Biotechnological Perspectives in Chemical Ecology of Insects (Edited by T. N. Ananthakrishnan). Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma H. C. (1998) Bionomics, host plant resistance and management of the legume pod borer Maruca vitrata, a review. Crop Protection 17, 378–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma H. C. and Ortiz R. (2002) Host plant resistance to insects: an eco-friendly approach for pest management and environment conservation. Journal of Environmental Biology 23, 11–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma H. C., Saxena K. B. and Bhagwat V. R. (1999) The legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata: bionomics and management. Information Bulletin, 55. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma K. K., Kalpana B. and Bijendra Singh (2005) Monitoring of pesticide residues: Indian and international scenario, pp. 45–54. In Proceedings of National Seminar on Pesticide Residues and their Risk Assessment, 20–21 January 2005, (Edited by D. Raghunatha Rao and J. Padmaja Rambabu) National Institute of Nutrition (ICMR), Hyderabad, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S. P. (1999) The eco-friendly approach. The Hindu: Survey of Indian Agriculture, (Edited by N. Ravi). National Press, Chennai, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandon H. L. S. (Ed.) (1993) Method of Analysis of Soil, Plants, Water and Fertilizers. Fertilizer Development and Consultation Organization, New Delhi, 143 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, 502324, Andhra Pradesh, India

    G. V. Ranga Rao, K. B. Saxena, V. Rameshwar Rao & Y. V. R. Reddy

  2. Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, 500030, Andhra Pradesh, India

    V. Sunitha & K. Vijaya Lakshmi

Authors
  1. V. Sunitha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. V. Ranga Rao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Vijaya Lakshmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K. B. Saxena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. V. Rameshwar Rao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Y. V. R. Reddy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. V. Ranga Rao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sunitha, V., Ranga Rao, G.V., Vijaya Lakshmi, K. et al. Morphological and biochemical factors associated with resistance to Maruca vitrata (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in short-duration pigeonpea. Int J Trop Insect Sci 28, 45–52 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758408959646

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758408959646

Key words

Search

Navigation