Skip to main content
Log in

Greenhouse Evaluation of Rice Cultivars for Resistance to Gall Midge, Orseolia Oryzae (Wood-Mason) and Studies on Mechanism of Resistance

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A total of 2256 germplasm accessions, 3000 advanced generation breeding lines and 150 released varieties of rice were screened under artificial infestation in the greenhouse. Among these, 15 new germplasm accessions, 50 breeding lines derived from 16 crosses and 15 released varieties were resistant. Antibiosis was the predominant resistance mechanism; antixenosis affecting oviposition was noted in 33 resistant varieties. Biochemical composition of a set of resistant varieties along with susceptible checks, revealed that nitrogen content of seven test varieties was significantly higher than that of the susceptible checks, while in other six varieties it was lower than the checks. Similarly, eight of the resistant varieties had considerably higher percentage of polyphenolic compounds in basal stem portion, but seven other cultivars showed significantly lower concentration as compared to susceptible checks. Thus, it was apparent that there was no clear trend among the resistant cultivars as a group in relation to quantitative differences of chemical components analysed.

Résumé

Un total de 2256 acquisitions de la banque de matériel (végétal) génétique, 3000 lignées avançées de selection de génération et 150 variétés de riz mises sur marché ont été soumises à l’infestation artificielle en serre pour criblage. Parmi celles-ci, 15 nouvelles acquisitions de la banque de matériel génétique, 15 lignées de selection issues de 16 croisements et 15 variétés mises sur marché ont été trouvées résistantes. Le méchanisme de résistance dominant ici était l’antibiose; l’antixénose liée à la ponte a été observée sur 33 variétés résistantes. La composition biochimique d’un lot de variétés résistantes aux côtés de témoins susceptibles a révélé que la teneur en azote de sept variétés testées était significativement plus élévée que celle de témoins susceptibles alors que chez six autres variétés, elle était plus faible par rapport aux témoins. De même, huit autres variétés résistantes avaient nettement un plus haut pourcentage de composés polyphénoliques au niveau de la base de la tige tandis que sept autres variétés ont montré une plus faible concentration, comparées aux témoins susceptibles. Par conséquent, il était évident qu’aucune tendance claire ne s’était dégagées au sein des variétés résistantes en tant que groupe vu les differences quantitatives au niveau de composantes chimiques analysés.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous (1952) CRRI (Central Rice Research Institute) Annual Report, 1952. ICAR, New Delhi, India (Mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1969) AICRIP (All India Coordinated Rice Improvement Project) Progress Report, Kharif 1977. ICAR, New Delhi, India (Mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1970) AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists) “Official Method of Analysis” 11th Ed. AOAC, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1977) IRRI (International Rice Research Institute) Annual Report of 1976. Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1981) Reaction of differential varieties to the rice gall midge Orseolia oryzae in Asia. International Rice Research Institute, Research Paper Series No.61, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1983) All India Coordinated Rice Improvement Project (AICRIP). Progress Report, Kharif 1983—ICAR, New Delhi, India (Mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1984) Directorate of Rice Research (DRR), Progress Report Kharif 1984—ICAR, New Delhi, India (Mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1985) Directorate of Rice Research (DRR), Progress Report, Kharif 1985, ICAR—New Delhi, India (Mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1986) Directorate of Rice Research (DRR) Progress Report, Kharif 1986, ICAR—New Delhi, India (Mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arifin K. and Van Vreden G. (1977) Mass rearing of the rice gall midge, Orseolia oryzae (Wood-Mason) Contrb. CRIA, Bogor, No. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das Y. T. (1976) Some factors of resistance to Chilo suppressalis in rice varieties. Entomol. exp. Appl. 20: 131–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois M., Gilles K. A., Hamilton J. K., Rebers P. A. and Smith F. (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry 28(3), 350–356.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hegdekatti R. M. (1927) The rice gall midge in North Kanara. Agric. J. India 22: 461–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrichs E. A. and Pathak P. K. (1981) Resistance to the rice gall midge, Orseolia oryzae in rice. Insect Sci. Applic. 1: 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidaka T. (1974) Recent studies on the rice gall midge, Orseolia oryzae (Wood-Mason), (Cecidomyiidae: Diptera). Rev. Plant Prot. Res. 7: 99–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidaka T. and Vungsilabutr P. (1971) Study on larval development of rice gall midge on susceptible and resistant rice varieties. Annual Report 1971. Rice Department. Ministry of Agriculture Bangkok, Thailand. 728 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel P., Vedamurthy G. and Rao Y. S. (1961) Varietal resistance to the gall midge, Pachydiplosis oryzae (Wood-Mason) and other insect pests of paddy. Working paper No. 21. 9th meeting Working Party of Rice Production and Protection, FAO, International Rice Commission, New Delhi, India pp. 5. (Mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi R. C. and Venugopal M. S. (1984) Mechanism of resistance in rice to gall midge Orseolia oryzae (Wood-Mason) I. Antibiosis. Indian J. Entomol. 46 (4), 479–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalode M. B. (1980) The rice gall midge—varietal resistance and chemical control. In Rice Improvement in China and other Asian Countries. IRR1 and Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, IRRI, Los Banos Philippines, pp. 173–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalode M. B. and Bentur J. S. (1988) Donors for resistance to Andhra Pradesh biotype 4 gallmidge (GM). Int. Rice Res. Newsl. 13, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalode M. B. and Bentur J. S.(1989) Characterization of Indian biotypes of the rice gall midge, Orseolia oryzae (Wood-Mason) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Insect Sci. Applic. 10: 214–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalode M. B., Krishna T. S., Pophaly D. J. and Lakshminarayana A. (1977a) Note on new donors having multiple resistance to major insect pests of rice. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 47: 626–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalode M. B., Pophaly D. J., Kasi Viswanathan P. R. and Sreeramulu M. (1977b) Studies on resistance and mass rearing of rice gall midge Orseolia (Pachydiplosis) oryzae (Wood-Mason). Madras Agric. J. 64: 733–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalode M. B., Mangal Sain, Bentur J. S., Pophaly D. J. and Raghavaiah H. (1983) New donors and mechanism of resistance to gall midge in rice grown in the green house. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 53: 483–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy Rao B. H. and Krishnamurthy C. (1964) Control of important sugarcane and paddy pests by cultural practices in Nizamabad district. Andhra Agric. J. 7(6), 218–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modder W. W. D. and Alagoda A. (1971) A comparison of the susceptibility of rice varieties. IR 8 and Warangal 1263, to attack by the gall midge, Pachydiplosis oryzae (Wood-Mason) (Dipt., Cecidomyiidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 61: 745–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen Cong-Tieu (1922) Note sur ure chcidomic du riz (Pachydiplosis oryzae) (Wood-Mason). Bull. Eco. Indo-China. 25: 590–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panda N. (1979) Principles of Host Plant Resistance to Insect Pests. Hindustan Publishing Corporation, India (Delhi).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pathak M. D. and Dale D. (1983) In biochemical basis of resistance in host plants to insect pests. In Chemistry and World Supplies. The New Frontiers, Chemerawen II (ed.) L. W. Schemilt. Pergamon Press, Oxford, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pathak M. D. and Khugh G. S. (1979) Studies on varietal resistance to brown plant hopper at IRRI. Paper Presented at Brown Planthopper Symposium. April 1977, IRRI, Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pathak P. K. and Heinrichs E. A. (1982) A Bibliography of Varietal Resistance to the Rice Gall Midge, Orseolia oryzae (Wood-Mason). CAB, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peraiah A. and Roy J. K. (1979) Studies on biochemical nature of gall midge resistance in rice. Oryza 16 (2): 149–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perera N. and Fernando H. E. (1969) Laboratory culture of the rice gall midge, Pachydiplosis oryzae (Wood-Mason). Bull. Entomol. Res. 58, 439–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prakasa Rao P. S. (1972) Ecology and control of Tryporyza incertulas (Walker) and Pachydiplosis oryzae (Wood-Mason) in rice. PhD. thesis, Utkal University, Bhubaneswar, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao Y. S., Israel P., Yadava C. P. and Roy J. K. (1971) Nature of gall midge resistance in rice. Curr. Sci. 40: 497–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajamani S. (1982) Factors affecting gall midge resistance in paddy. Ph.D.thesis, Utkal University, Bhubaneswar, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy J. K., Israel P. L. and Panwar M. S. (1969) Breeding for insect resistance in rice. Oryza 6(2), 38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy J. K., Israel P. and Panwar M. S. (1971) Breeding for resistance to insect pests. Oryza 8 (Suppl.), 129–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena R. C. and Khan Z.R. (1989) Factors affecting resistance of rice varieties to planthoppers and leafhoppers. Agric. Zool. Rev. 3: 97–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seshu D. V., Prakasa Rao P. S., Kalode M. B., Shastry S. V. S., Srinivasan T. E., Rao J. R., Misra B. C., Prasad K., Rao U. P., Kulshreshtha J. P. and Roy J. K. (1974) Breeding for resistance to rice gall midge, leaf hoppers and planthoppers in India. In International Rice Research Conference, 1974. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines (Mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shastry S. V. S., Freeman W. M., Seshu D. V., Israel P. and Roy J. K. (1972) Host plant resistance to rice gall midge. In Rice Breeding. IRRI, Los Banos, Philippines, pp. 353–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sogawa K. (1973) Feeding behaviour of the brown plant hopper and brown planthopper resistance of indica rice Mudgo. Laboratory of Applied Entomology Faculty of Agriculture. Nagoya University. Bull. No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain T. and Hills W. E. (1959) The phenolic constituents of Prumus domestica. Quantitative analysis of phenolic constituents. J. Sc. Food and Agric. 10: 63–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Venkataswamy T. (1966) Association between hairiness and resistance to gall midge (Pachydiplosis oryzae) in rice. Andhra Agric. J. 13, 149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidyachandra B., Roy J. K. and Bhaskar Das (1981) Chemical differences in rice varieties susceptible or resistant to gall midge and stem borer. Int. Rice Res. Newslett. 6(2), 7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sain, M., Kalode, M.B. Greenhouse Evaluation of Rice Cultivars for Resistance to Gall Midge, Orseolia Oryzae (Wood-Mason) and Studies on Mechanism of Resistance. Int J Trop Insect Sci 15, 67–74 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758400016787

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758400016787

Keywords

Motsclés

Navigation