Skip to main content
Log in

Oviposition and Infestation of the Sorghum Shootfly, Atherigona soccata Rondani, on Certain Sorghum Cultivars in Relation to their Relative Resistance and Susceptibility

  • Section V Screening Techniques and Methodologies for Host Plant Resistance Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sorghum shootfly, Atherigona soccata, oviposition and infestation on eight resistant sorghum cultivars (IS nos: 2122, 2123, 2205, 2291, 4660, 5092, 5480 and 18551) and two susceptible cultivars (Serena and CSH-1), were studied under field conditions (natural infestation). The eight resistant cultivars and CSH-1 were also tested for preference for oviposition in a two-choice situation in the screenhouse. The eight resistant cultivars received considerably less shootfly eggs and showed fewer “dead hearts” than the susceptible cultivars. The results indicate that non-preference for oviposition is an important mechanism for resistance to shootfly in eight test cultivars. There was also evidence for a certain degree of antibiosis in IS 2291.

Résumé

La mouche de sorgho, Atherigona soccata, oviposition et infestation sur huit cultivars de sorgho (IS nos: 2122, 2123, 2205, 2291, 4660, 5092, 5480 et 18551) ont montré une résistance a la mouche de sorgho et deux cultivars susceptibles (Serena et CSH 1) ont été étudiés dans les champs (infestation naturelle). Les huit cultivars résistants et CSH 1 ont été testés quant a la préférence de la mouche pour oviposition dans une situation à deux choix dans la maison de dépistage. Les huit cultivars résistant ont reçu considérablement moins d’oeufs et ont montré de coeurs morts (dead hearts) que des cultivars susceptibles. Les résultats ont montré que la non-préférence pour oviposition est un mécanisme important pour la résistance dans les huit cultivars experimentaux. On a décelé aussi un certain degré d’antibiose dans IS 2291.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blum A. (1967) Varietal resistance of sorghum shootfly (Atherigona varia soccata). Crop Sci. 7, 461–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum A. (1969) Oviposition preference by the sorghum shootfly (Atherigona varia soccata) in progenies of susceptible x resistant sorghum crosses. Crop Sci. 9, 695–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delobel A. G. L. (1983) Influence of temperature and host plant condition on preimaginal development and survival in the sorghum shootfly Atherigona soccata. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 327–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doggett H. (1972) Breeding for resistance to sorghum shootfly in Uganda. In Control of Sorghum Shootfly (Edited by Jotwani M. G. and Young W. R.), pp. 192–201. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain K. K. and Bhatnagar M. P. (1962) Studies on varietal resistance to Jowar shootfly. Indian J. Genet PI. Breed. 22, 224–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jotwani M. G. (1976) Host plant resistance with special reference to sorghum. Proc. Indian natn. Acad. Sci. 463, 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jotwani M. G., Sharma G. C., Srivastava B. G. and Marwaha K. K. (1971) Ovipositional response of shootfly Atherigona varia soccata Rondani on some promising resistant sorghum. In Investigations on Insect Pests of Sorghum and Millets. Final Technical Report 1965–70, pp. 119–122. Division of Entomology, IARI, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maiti R. K., Bidinger F. R., Seshu Reddy K. V., Gibson P. and Davies J. C. (1980) Nature and occurrence of tri-chomes in sorghum lines with resistance to sorghum shootfly. In Joint Progress Report, Sorghum Physiology — 3/Sorghum Entomology—3, p. 40. ICRISAT, Andhra Pradesh, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raina A. K. (1981) Deterrence of repeated oviposition in sorghum shootfly Atherigona soccata. J. chem. Ecol. 7, 785–790.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raina A. K., Thindwa H. Z., Othieno S. M. and Corkhill R. T. (1981) Resistance in sorghum to the sorghum shootfly: larval development and adult longevity and fecundity on selected cultivars. Insect Sci. Applic. 2, 99–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shie Shiang-Lin, Fan Zi-De and Su Shou-Hua (1981) Studies on the sorghum shootfly in China. Insect Sci. Applic. 2, 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S. P. and Jotwani M. G. (1980) Mechanisms of resistance in sorghum to shootfly 1. Ovipositionai nonpreference. Indian J. Ent. 42, 353–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S. R., Vedamoorthy G., Thobbi V. V., Jotwani M. G., Young W. R., Balan J. S., Srivastava K. P., Sandhu G. S. and Krishnanda N. (1968) Resistance to stem-borer, Chilo zonellus (Swinhoe) and stem fly Atherigona varia soccata Rond, in the World sorghum collection in India. Mem. ent. Soc. India 7, 1–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S. P., Jotwani M. G., Rana B. S. and Rao N. G. P. (1978) Stability of host-plant resistance to sorghum shootfly Atherigona soccata. Indian J. Ent. 40, 376–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young W. R. (1972) Sources of resistance to the sorghum shootfly Atherigona varia soccata Rond. In Control Sorghum Shootfly (Edited by Jotwani M. G. and Young W. R.), pp. 137–148. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young W. R. and Teetes G. L. (1977) Sorghum entomology. A. Rev. Ent. 22, 193–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Unnithan, G.C., Seshu Reddy, K.V. Oviposition and Infestation of the Sorghum Shootfly, Atherigona soccata Rondani, on Certain Sorghum Cultivars in Relation to their Relative Resistance and Susceptibility. Int J Trop Insect Sci 6, 409–412 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758400004719

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758400004719

Key Words

Mots Cléfs

Navigation