Skip to main content
Log in

Taste Sensilla Responses to Limonoids, Natural Insect Antifeedants

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Limonoids such as deoxylimonin, obacunone and pedonin are known to have antifeedant effects against some lepidopteran pests. However, there is no electrophysiological data showing the effect these compounds have on taste receptor cells. This information gap is due to the fact that limonoids are insoluble in water and this makes it difficult to apply the tip-recording technique in an electrophysiological bioassay of limonoids. This problem was solved by dissolving the limonoids in a mixture of SO % tetrahydrof uran and 50 % aqueous NaCl. Limonoids and sucrose so dissolved were used to investigate responses of Eldana saccharina maxillary styloconic sensilla. The solvent mixture did not appear to damage the taste receptor cells and the taste receptor responses to solutes dissolved in that solvent were reproducible. Sucrose stimulated a cell in the medial as well as in the lateral styloconic sensilla. Deoxylimonin alone stimulated a cell in the medial sensillum but not in the lateral sensillum. When presented with sucrose, deoxylimonin inhibited the sugar receptor cell and this was also true for obacunone.

Résumé

Les limonoides tels que la déoxylimonine, l’obacunone et la pédonine sont connus pour leurs propriétés désappéntantes sur certains lépidoptères ravageurs. Cependant il n’existe aucune donnée électrophysiologique mettant en évidence l’effet de ces substances sur les cellules des récepteurs gustatifs. Cette lacune provient de la difficulté d’appliquer une technique d’enregistrement distal avec les limonoides, qui sont insolubles dans l’eau. Les limonoides ont donc été dissouts dans un mélange de 50% tetrahydrofurane et 50% NaCl en solution aqueuse. On a observé la réponse des sensilles maxillaires stylo-coniques aux limonoides et an sucrose ainsi préparés. Le mélange de solvants ne semble pas endommager les cellules du récepteur gustatif et al réponse aux solutés est reproductible. Le sucrose stimule une cellule du sensille stylo-conique médian ainsi que du sensille stylo-conique latéral. La déoxylimonine seule ne stimule que le sensille médian. La déoxylimonine et l’obacunone inhibe la réponse au sucrose de la cellule réceptrice du sucre.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alford A. R., Cullen J. A., Storch R. N. and Bentley M. D. (1987) Antifeedant activity of limonin against the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera Chrysomelidae). J. econ. Entomol. 80, 599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaney W. M. (1975) Behavioral and electrophysiological studies of taste discrimination by the maxillary palps of larvae of Locusta migratoria (L). J. exp. Biol. 62, 555–569.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blaney W. M. (1980) Chemoreception and food selection by locusts. Olfaction and Taste 7, 127–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaney W. M., Simmonds S. J., Ley S. V., Katz R. B. (1987) An electrophysiological and behavioral study of insect antifeedant properties of natural and synthetic drimane-related compounds. Physiol. Entomol. 12, 281–291.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth J. H. and Morgan E. D. (1968) Isolation of a substance that suppresses feeding in locusts. Chem.Comm. 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth J. H. and Morgan E. D. (1971) Investigation of the locust feeding inhibition of the seeds of the neem tree, Azadirachta indica. J. Insect Physiol. 17, 969–977.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman R. F. (1974) The chemical inhibition of feeding by phytophagous insects: a review. Bull. entomol. Res. 64, 339–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dethier V. G. (1972) Sensitivity of the contact chemoreceptors of the blowfly to vapours. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sei. USA 69, 2189–2192.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dethier V. G. (1974) The specificity of the labellar chemoreceptors of the blowfly and the response to natural foods. J. Insect Physiol. 20 1859–1869.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dethier V. G. (1980) Evolution of receptor sensitivity to secondary plant substances with special reference to deterrents. Am. Nat. 115, 45–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier J. L. and Hanson F. E. (1986) Electrophysiological recordings and analysis of insect chemosensory responses. In Insect Plant Interactions (Edited by Miller J. R. and Miller T.A.), pp. 285–330. Springer-Verlag, N.Y.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haskell P. T. and Schoonhoven L. M. (1969) The function of certain mouthpart receptors in relation to feeding in Schistocerca gregaria and Locusta migratoria migratorioides. Entomol. exp.appl. 12, 433–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassanali A., Bentley M. D., Ole Sitayo E. N., Njoroge P. E. W. and Yatagai M. (1986) Studies on limonoid insect antifeedants. Insect Sei. Applic. 7, 495.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanali A., Bentley M. D., Alexandra M. Z. S., Williams D. J., Shepherd R. N. and Chapya A. W. (1987) Pedonin, a spiro tetranortriterpenoid insect antifeedant from Harissonia abyssinica. Phytochemistry 26, 573–575.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson E. S., Lettvin J. Y. and Roeder K. D. (1955) Physiology of a primary chemoreceptor unit. Science 122, 417–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa S., Hirao T. and Arai N. (1969) Chemosensory basis of hostplant selection in the silkworm. Entomol. exp. appl. 12, 544–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klocke J.A. and Kubo I. (1982) Citrus limonoids by-products as insect control agents. Entomol. exp. appl. 32, 299–301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus N., Cramer R., Bökel M., and Sawitzk G. (1981) New insect antifeedants from Azadirachta indica and Melia azadirachta. Proc. 1st Neem Conf. Rottach-Egem, W. Germany June 1980. pp. 267–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma W.C. (1972) Dynamics of feeding responses in Pieris brassicae Linn, as a function of chemosensory input: a behavioral, ultrastructural and electrophysiological study. Meded. Landbouwhogesch. Wageningen 72/11, pp.162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma W. C. (1977) Alteration of chemoreceptor function in armyworm larvae (Spodoptera exempta) by a plant-derived sesquiterpenoid and sulfhydryl reagent. Physiol. Entomol. 2, 199–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morita H. and Takeda K. (1959) Initiation of spike potentials in contact chemosensory hairs of insects II. The effect of electrical current on tarsal chemosensory hairs of Vanessa. J. Cell Comp. Physiol. 54, 177–187.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena R. C., Justo H. D. and Epino P. B. (1984) Evaluation and utilization of neem cake against the rice brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Homoptera: Delphacidae). J. econ. Entomol. 77, 502–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider D. (1957) Electrophysiologiche Unterschugen von Chemo und mecharnorezeptoren der antenne des Seidenspinners, Bombyx mori L. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 40, 8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoonhoven L. M. (1973) Plant recognition by lepidopterous larvae. Symp. R. Entomol. Soc. London 6, 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoonhoven L. M. (1982) Biological aspects of antifeedants. Ent. exp. appl. 31, 57–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schoonven L. M. and Dethier V. G. (1966) Sensory aspects of host plant discrimination by lepidopterous larvae. Arch. Neerl. Zool. 16, 497–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staedler E. (1976) Sensory aspects of insect plant interactions. Proc. XV Int. Congr. Ent., Washington D.C. 1976, pp. 228–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturkow B. (1959) Ueber den Deschmackssinn und den Tastsinn von Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say (Chrysomelidae). Z. ver gl. Physiol. 42, 255–302.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waladde, S.M., Hassanali, A. & Ochieng, S.A. Taste Sensilla Responses to Limonoids, Natural Insect Antifeedants. Int J Trop Insect Sci 10, 301–308 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758400003532

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758400003532

Key Words

Mots Clefs

Navigation