Skip to main content
Log in

Screening for Resistance to Gram Pod Borer, Heliothis Armigera (Hubner), in Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L.) Genotypes and Observations on Its Mechanism of Resistance in India

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Eight desi chickpea genotypes of mid-maturity group were screened by using an open-field screening technique. The genotypes ICC-3137, K-850 and ICC-1403 were found to be more susceptible than the others. More eggs were laid and more larvae were recorded on more susceptible genotypes. A low amount of acidity in the leaf extracts of genotypes was found to be associated with susceptibility to gram pod borer, Heliothis armigera (Hubner).

Résumé

Huit variétés de pois-chiche (type Desi) ont été testées pour leur résistance à Heliothis armigera (Lepid. Noctuidae) en plein champs. Les génotypes ICC 3137, K 850 et ICC 1403 se sont avérés les plus sensibles anx attaques de l’insecte. Les variétés présentant une résistance vis à vis de l’insecte sont caractérisées par des exudations foliaires plus acides que celles des variétés plus sensibles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Koundal K.K. and Sinha S.K. (1981) Malic acid exudation and photosynthetic characteristics in Cicer arietinum. Phytochemistry 20, 1251–1252.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lai S.S., Yadava C.P. and Dias C.A.R. (1985) Assessment of crop losses in chickpea caused by Heliothis armigera. FAO Plant Prot. Bull. 33, 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lateef S.S. (1985) Gram pod borer (Heliothis armigera) (Hub.) resistance in chickpeas. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 14, 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lateef S.S. and Reed W. (1983) Grading plant genotypes for their resistance to insect pests in a field screening programme. Paper presented at the National Seminar on Breeding Crop Plants for Resistance to Pest and Diseases, 25–27 May 1983 at Tamil Nadu Agriculture University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed W., Lateef S.S. and Sithanantham S. (1980) Insect Pest Management of Chickpea. InProc. of the International Workshop on Chickpea Improvement, 28 Feb–2 March 1979 at ICRIS AT Centre, Patancheru, A.P., India, pp.179–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rembold H. (1981) Malic acid in chickpea exudate a marker for Heliothis resistance. Int. Chickpea Newsl., ICRISAT 4, 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rembold H. and Winter E. (1982) The chemist’s role in host-plant resistance studies. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Heliothis Management, 15–20 Nov. 1981 at ICRISAT Center, Patancheru, A.P., India, pp.241–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahasrabuddhe D.L. (1914) The acid secretion of gram plant (Cicer arietinum). Imperial Agricultural Research Institute, PusaBull. 45, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh H. and Sharma S.S. (1970) Relative susceptibility of some important varietiesof gram to Heliothis armigera Hubner. Indian J. Entomol. 32, 170–171.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Srivastava, C.P., Srivastava, R.P. Screening for Resistance to Gram Pod Borer, Heliothis Armigera (Hubner), in Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L.) Genotypes and Observations on Its Mechanism of Resistance in India. Int J Trop Insect Sci 10, 255–258 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758400003477

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758400003477

Key Words

Mots Clefs

Navigation