Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Measures by the Austrian Regulatory Authorities in Response to the Financial Market Crisis

  • Articles
  • Published:
European Business Organization Law Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The financial crisis has severely hit the Austrian banks and the financial market as a whole. Austrian banks sold ‘Lehman-products’ to a disproportionate extent, banks invested far too high amounts in Iceland, and finally and most importantly, Austrian banks did and are doing their main business in CEE countries, which have been heavily affected by the crisis.

The Austrian government and parliament have reacted by taking different measures to support the near-collapsing banks. Apart from granting guarantees and promoting interbank business through different measures, the main instrument has been to improve the capital ratio by issuing so-called participation capital subscribed for by the government. Although generally the holders of participation capital do not have membership rights, the state is entitled to exercise control rights via a special company.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Putzer, ‘Finanzmarktstabilisierung: Das österreichische Maßnahmenpaket’, Zeitschrift für Finanzmarktrecht (2009) p. 50.

  2. M. Posch, R. Schmitz and H. Weber, OeNB-Finanzmarktstabilitätsbericht 17 (June 2009), at p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Niedermayr-Kruse and B. Bernkopf, ‘Der Kredit ist tot — es lebe der Kredit!’, CFO aktuell (2009), at p. 146; cf. Parlamentskorrespondenz 02/23.06.2009/no. 561.

  4. R. Rebhahn, Studiengesellschaft für Wirtschaft und Recht, ed., Finanzmarktregulierung (Vienna, Linde, forthcoming in 2011).

  5. H. Wollmann, ‘Staatliche Hilfsmaßnahmen in der Finanzkrise — Beihilfenrechtliche Rahmenbedingungen’, ecolex (2009) p. 110.

  6. R. Schmitz and P. Weidenholzer, Österreichische Nationalbank, ed., OeNB-Finanzmarktstabilitätsbericht 18 (December 2009) p. 18, at p. 63 ff.

  7. Posch, Schmitz and Weber, supra n. 4, at p. 74.

  8. Posch, Schmitz and Weber, supra n. 4, at p. 72; cf. Niedermayr-Kruse and Bernkopf, supra n. 5, at p. 145.

  9. 683 BlgNR 23. GP 2 (Report of the Financial Committee); Putzer, supra n. 2.

  10. Cf. Rebhahn, supra n. 6.

  11. A. Putzer, FinStaG — IBSG, Finanzmarktstabilitätspaket (Vienna Manz 2009) § 2 FinStaG, note 4; S. Hödl, ‘Staatliche Eigenkapitalinstrumente in der Finanzkrise. Umsetzung in der Praxis’, ecolex (2009) p. 113; critical: A. Wolfgring, ‘Was ist Eigenkapital der Banken in der Krise eigentlich wert?’, Österreichisches Bankarchiv (ÖBA) (2008) p. 874; cf. also: J. Reich-Rohrwig, ‘Memo: Eigenmittel für Banken — Definitionen des BWG’, ecolex (2008) p. 1079.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Posch, Schmitz and Weber, supra n. 4, at p. 79.

  13. EU clearance decision of 9 December 2008, OJ C 3/2 of 8.1.2009, no. 6; Hödl, supra n. 16, at p. 115.

  14. Cf. article by A. Kahl, in Studiengesellschaft für Wirtschaft und Recht, Finanzmarktregulierung (forthcoming in 2010).

  15. FIMBAG Management Report 2008 (abridged business year).

  16. H. Krejci, ‘Finstres im FinStaG? Darf der Bund selbst Partizipationskapital erwerben und der FIMBAG zur treuhändigen Verwaltung übertragen?’, Festschrift Manfred Straube (2009) p. 55, at p. 57 ff.

  17. Cf. Parlamentskorrespondenz 02/23.06.2009/no. 561.

  18. Cf. Krejci, supra n. 22, at p. 57 ff.

  19. Cf. Parlamentskorrespondenz 02/23.06.2009/no. 561.

  20. State Aid Decision No. 557/2008 Austria; cf. Wollmann, supra n. 7.

  21. Putzer, supra n. 2, at p. 52.

  22. Cf., e.g., Putzer, supra n. 16, § 2 FinStaG, note 9.

  23. Putzer, supra n. 2, at p. 52.

  24. Hödl, supra n. 16, at p. 113 ff.

  25. J. Zollner, in P. Doralt, C. Nowotny and S. Kalss, Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz (Vienna, Linde 2003) § 174, no. 20; N. Nagele and D. Lux, in P. Jabornegg and R. Strasser, Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz, 5th edition (Vienna, Manz 2010) § 174, no. 55; M. Winner, in Münchener Kommentar zum AktG2 (Munich, Beck 2006) § 221, no. 398; R. van Husen, Genussrechte, Genussscheine — Partizipationskapital (Vienna, Verlag Österreich 1998), at p. 302 ff; OGH ÖBA 2002, at p. 135, ultimately leaving the matter open

    Google Scholar 

  26. Winner, supra n. 39, § 221, no. 399.

  27. Ibid., at no. 397; van Husen, supra n. 39, at p. 305 ff; C. Nowotny, ‘Möglichkeiten der Ausgestaltung von Partizipationskapital’, Festschrift René Laurer (2009) p. 277, at p. 298.

  28. Nowotny, supra n. 41, at p. 278.

  29. M. Dellinger, M. Burger and S. Puhm, in M. Dellinger, ed., Kommentar zum Bankwesengesetz, BWG (2008 — 2nd supplement) (Vienna, Lexis-Nexis) § 23, no. 36.

  30. Cf., e.g., Der Standard of 16 September 2009, p. 2; also: Der Standard of 27 February 2009.

  31. Nowotny, supra n. 41, at p. 297; also: F. Sommer and C. Hirsch, in M. Dellinger, ed., Kommentar zum Bankwesengesetz, BWG (2009) § 38, no. 105.

  32. Hödl, supra n. 16, at p. 116.

  33. P. Göth, in P. Göth and G. Diwok, Bankwesengesetz (Vienna, Verlag Österreich 2003) § 23, no. 36; Hödl, supra n. 16, at p. 116.

  34. Hödl, supra n. 16.

  35. Winner, supra n. 39, § 221, no. 409; Zollner, supra n. 39, § 174, no. 41; Nagele and Lux, in Jabornegg and Strasser, supra n. 39, § 174, no. 19.

  36. OGH Der Gesellschafter (GesRZ) (2003) p. 285; OGH 10 Ob 34/05f, Wirtschaftsrechtliche Blätter (2006) p. 278; also: VwGH, Österreichische Zeitschrift für Steuerrecht (1994) p. 544; Nagele and Lux, in Jabornegg and Strasser, supra n. 39, § 174, no. 3.

  37. Winner, supra n. 39, § 221, no. 389; M. Karollus, in J. Geßler and W. Hefermehl, Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz (Munich, Vahlen 1998) § 221, no. 278 ff; C. Lindinger, ‘Über Zulässigkeit und Beendbarkeit bestimmter Genussrechte’, Juristische Blätter (2003) p. 724, at p. 728 ff.

  38. Nowotny, supra n. 41.

  39. Winner, supra n. 39, § 221, no. 433 ff; Nowotny, supra n. 41, at p. 289.

  40. Nowotny, supra n. 41, at p. 298 et seq.

  41. Ibid., at p. 298; also: M. Dellinger, in M. Dellinger and F. Mohr, Kommentar zum Eigenkapitalgesetz (Vienna, Manz 2002) § 10, no. 8; A. Schopper and D. Vogt, Eigenkapitalersatzgesetz (Vienna, Verlag Österreich 2001) § 10, no. 13 ff.

  42. Wollmann, supra n. 7, at p. 111.

  43. Cf. annual report of Hypo Alpe Adria 2009, at p. 40; consolidated annual report of ÖVAG 2009, at p. 117 ff. If the negotiations between the Republic of Austria and Unicredit Bank Austria AG had led to an agreement about the provision of participation capital, the Republic of Austria would probably have achieved a positive result for the year 2009.

  44. Cf. only P. Mülbert, ‘Corporate Governance von Banken’, 173 Zeitschrift für Handels- und Unternehmensrecht (2009) p. 3; S. Kalss, ‘Aktienrechtliche Regelungen der Mitarbeiterbeteiligung, in Aktiengesellschaften’, Wiener Bilanzrechtstage (2009) p. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Supreme Court OGH 7 Ob 58/08t, GesRZ 6/2008, p. 151 (S. Kalss).

  46. S. Kalss, in Münchener Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz3 (Munich, Beck 2008) § 87, Rz 130; M. Eiselsberg and T. Haberer, ‘Zur Angemessenheit der Vorstandsvergütung im Spannungsverhältnis von Markt, Kodex und Gesetz’, Zeitschrift für Rechnungslegung und Wirtschaftsprüfung (2004) p. 65, at p. 67 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Interpreted differently in Supreme Court OGH 7 Ob 58/08t, available at: <http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Judikatur>.

  48. Cf. G. Schima, ‘Vergütung für den Vorstand: Regeln verschärft’, Die Presse, 11 January 2010 (Rechtspanorama).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Economics and Business (WU Wien), Vienna, Austria

    Susanne Kalss (Professor of Civil and Commercial Law)

Authors
  1. Susanne Kalss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalss, S. Measures by the Austrian Regulatory Authorities in Response to the Financial Market Crisis. Eur Bus Org Law Rev 11, 527–548 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1566752910400026

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1566752910400026

Keywords

Search

Navigation