Abstract
As in other European Union countries, Spanish local governments, by law and according to their population size, provide a number of basic services, which include the local police service, fire-fighting, refuse collection, street cleaning, land use control, urban transportation, social services, leisure and cultural activities, public works and town planning, slaughterhouses, central markets, housing, etc. Only the larger Spanish municipalities participate in the delivery of services such as education or health, which are under regional government responsibility. The vast majority of Spanish municipalities are very small. Recently, some Autonomous Communities have been establishing supra-municipal or district authorities (Comarcas), grouping several municipalities in order to manage the delivery of common local services.
Public-private partnership initiatives were introduced into Spain by the Municipal Services Act of 1955, which allows the provision of local services by private operators. This act was updated by the Public Contracting Act of 1995, which was recently amended to bring it into line with EU legislation. Spanish local governments have traditionally provided services using almost all PPP methods, such as local government corporations, concessions or franchises, lease of assets with or without additional investment, public-private ventures, associations with other local governments, public entities and non-profit organisations.
The results of our work on local service provision, set out in this paper, show a higher degree of PPP initiatives in medium-sized Spanish cities than in the rest. We find no statistical differences in the levels of efficiency observed in public and private urban transport operators. Finally, we observe both a need to update car park concessions in Spanish local administrations, incorporating mechanisms to increase efficiency, and an absence of homogeneity in these concessions because there is no unit that advises public authorities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Accounting Standards Board (1998) Amendment to FRS 5 ‘Reporting the Substance of Transactions’: The Private Finance Initiative and Similar Contracts (London, HM Stationery Office).
Banker, R.D. (1984) ‘Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis’, European Journal of Operational Research 17: 35–44.
Banker, R., Charnes, A., Cooper, W., Swarts, J. and Thomas, D. (1989) ‘An introduction to data envelopment analysis with some of its models and their uses’, Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting, Vol. 5 pp. 125–163.
Boyne, G.A. (1998) ‘Bureaucratic Theory Meets Reality: Public Choice and Service Contracting in US Local Government’, Public Administration Review, 58,6, pp. 474–84.
Charnes, A.W., Cooper W.W. And Rhodes, E. (1978) ‘Measuring Efficiency of Decision Making Units’, European Journal of Operational Research 429–444.
Cohen, S. (2001) ‘A strategic framework for devolving responsibility and functions from government to private sector’, Public Administration Review, 61,4 pp. 432–440.
De Borger, B., Kerstens, K. And Costa, A. (2002) ‘Public transit performance: what does one learn from frontier studies?’, Transport Reviews, 22, 1, 1–38.
Eurostat (2002) ESA 95 Manual on government deficit and debt (Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of European Communities).
Goldsmith, M.J. and Page, E.C. (1997) ‘Farewell to the British State?’, in J.E. Lane, eds., Public Sector Reforms. Rationale, Trends and Problems. 147–168.
Hair, J.F., et al. (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed. (Prentice Hall).
Kane, M. (1996) ‘The nature of competition in British local government’, Public Policy and Administration, 11,3, 51–66.
Levaggi, R. (1994) ‘Parametric and Nonparametric Approach to Efficiency: The Case of Urban Transport in Italy’, Studi-Economici; 49(53), 1994, pp. 67–88.
Mccaan, W. (1998) ‘The Business of People: a CEO’s Perspective’, Canberra Bulletin of Public Administration, 89, 120–127.
Partnerships Victoria (2001) Practitioner’s Guide (Territory of Victoria, Australia, The Secretary Department of Treasury and Finance).
Pina, V. and Torres, L.(2001) ‘Analysisof the efficiency of local governments services delivery. An application to urban public transport’, Transportation Research Part A, 35,10, 929–944.
Private Finance Panel (1995) Private Opportunity, Public Benefit: Progressing the Private Finance Initiative (London, HM Stationery Office).
Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (1999) Exposure Draft ED 100 ‘Arrangements for the Provision of Public Infrastructure by Other Entities — Disclosure Requirements’ (Caulfield, Australian Accounting Standards Board).
Seiford, L. (1995) ‘Data Envelopment Analysis: The Evolution of the State of the Art (1978-1995)’, The Journal of the Productivity Analysis, Vol. 7 pp. 99–137.
Subirats, J. (1989) Análisis de políticas públicas y eficacia de la Administración MAP.
Torres, L. & Pina, V. (2001) ‘Public-Private Partnership and Private Finance Initiative in European Union Local Governments and Spain’, European Accounting Review Vol. 10 n°3 pp. 601–619.
Torres, L. & Pina, V. (2002) Changesin Public Service Delivery in the EU countries Public Money and Management Vol. 22 n° 4 pp. 41–48.
Walsh, K. and H. Davis (1993) Competition and Service (London, HMSO).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was carried out with the financial support of the Spanish R&D Plan, under research project SEC2001-2433.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Torres, L., Pina, V. & Acerete, B. Public-Private Partnership in Spanish Local Governments. Eur Bus Org Law Rev 4, 429–452 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1566752903004294
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1566752903004294