Abstract
Despite recent developments in ECJ case law, the ability of EU firms to choose among different Member State corporate law regimes is quite limited. At the same time, however, Member States have started to show an interest in providing competitive business forms, and firms seem keen to use them. Against this background, the ongoing review of EU company law and takeover law can be seen as an attempt to complete the set of minimum requirements that establish a limit for the ‘race to the bottom’. This paper suggests that, unfortunately, many of the proposed harmonization measures in the Commission’s Action Plan are unlikely to benefit firms and investors and will promote costly bureaucratic uniformity.
Indeed, as currently structured, the proposals regarding disclosure, board structure and director liability have limited merits. Moreover, reforms aimed at the establishment of a permanent structure providing advice on future EU regulatory initiatives and requiring Member States to adopt director disqualification mechanisms are likely to result in excessive regulatory intervention. Similarly, many provisions of the proposed Takeover Bids Directive can be expected to hamper rather than enhance the development of a competitive, cross-border market for corporate control. By contrast, the authors recommend regulatory changes that facilitate private litigation, as this may limit regulatory biases and contribute to disciplining managers and gatekeepers. Finally, the authors endorse a default arrangement for takeovers that would allow firms to choose to be governed either by the proposed Takeover Bids Directive or by existing Member State law. The move towards more choice should challenge regulators to provide more cost-effective rules.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arlen, Jennifer and Eric Talley. 2003. ‘Unregulable Defenses and the Perils of Shareholder Choice’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review (forthcoming).
Barca, Fabrizio and Marco Becht (eds.). 2001. The Control of Corporate Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baums, Theodor. 2003. ‘Company Law Reform in Germany’. Journal of Corporate Law Studies 3: 181.
Bebchuk, Lucian A. 1985. ‘Toward Undistorted Choice and Equal Treatment in Takeovers’. Harvard Law Review 98: 1695.
Bebchuk, Lucian A. 1994. ‘Efficient and Inefficient Sales of Corporate Control’. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109: 957.
Bebchuk, Lucian A. 2003. ‘The Case for Empowering Shareholders’. Economics and Business Working Paper. Harvard University: John M. Olin Center for Law (available at <http://www.ssrn.com>).
Bebchuk, Lucian A., John C. Coates IV and Guhan Subramian. 2002. ‘The Powerful Antitakeover Force of Staggered Boards: Theory, Evidence, and Policy’. Stanford Law Review 54: 887.
Bebchuk, Lucian A. and Alma Cohen. 2003. ‘Firms’ Decision Where to Incorporate’. Journal of Law and Economics 46 (forthcoming).
Bebchuk, Lucian A., Alma Cohen and Allen Ferrell. 2002. ‘Does the Evidence Favor State Competition in Corporate Law?’. California Law Review 90: 1775.
Bebchuk, Lucian A. and Allen Ferrell. 2001. ‘Federal Intervention to Enhance Shareholder Choice’. Virginia Law Review 87: 111.
Bebchuk, Lucian A. and Assaf Hamdani. 2002. ‘Vigorous Race or Leisurely Walk: Reconsidering the Competition over Corporate Charters’. Yale Law Journal 112: 553.
Bebchuk, Lucian A. and Mark J. Roe. 1999. ‘A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Ownership and Governance’. Stanford Law Review 52: 775.
Behrens, Peter. 2001. ‘Centros and the Proper Law of Companies’. In Guido Ferrarini, Klaus J. Hopt and Eddy Wymeersch (eds.). Capital Markets in the Age of the EURO. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Berglöf, Erik. 1997. ‘Reforming Corporate Governance’. European Economy 24: 93.
Berglöf, Erik and Mike Burkart. 2002. ‘Breakthrough in European Takeover Regulation?’. Stockholm School of Economics Working Paper (available at <http://www.ssrn.com>).
Berkowitz, Daniel, Katharina Pistor and Jean-Francois Richard. 2003. ‘The Transplant Effect’. American Journal of Comparative Law 51: 163.
Black, Bernard S. 1990. ‘Is Corporate Law Trivial? — A Political and Economic Analysis’. Northwestern University Law Review 84: 542.
Black, Bernard S., Reinier Kraakman and Anna Tarassova. 2000. ‘Russian Privatization and Corporate Governance: What Went Wrong?’. Stanford Law Review 52: 1731.
Bratton, William W. and Joseph A. McCahery. 1999. ‘Comparative Corporate Governance and the Theory of the Firm’. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 38: 213.
Brickley, James A., Jeffrey L. Coles and Rory L. Terry. 1994. ‘Outside Directors and the Adoption of Poison Pills’. Journal of Finance 35: 371.
Burkart, Mike, Denis Gromb and Fausto Panunzi. 1998. ‘Why Higher Takeover Premia Protect Minority Shareholders’. Journal of Political Economy 106: 172.
Cheffins, Brian. 1997. Company Law: Theory, Structure and Operation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Choi, Stephen J. and Adam C. Pritchard. 2003. ‘Behavioral Economics and the SEC’. Stanford Law Review 56 (forthcoming).
Coates, John C. IV. 2001. ‘Explaining Variations in Takeover Defenses: Blame the Lawyers’. California Law Review 89: 1301.
Coffee, John C. Jr. 1999. ‘The Future as History: The Prospects for Global Convergence in Corporate Governance and Its Implications’. Northwestern University Law Review 93: 641.
— 2001. ‘The Acquiescent Gatekeeper: Reputational Intermediaries, Auditor Independence and the Governance of Accounting’. Working Paper. Columbia University School of Law and John M. Olin Center of Law and Economics (available at <http://www.ssrn.com>).
Conac, Pierre-Henri. 2002. La Régulation des Marchés Boursiers par la COB et la SEC. Paris: LGDJ-Montchrestien.
Daines, Robert. 2001. ‘Does Delaware Law Improve Firm Value?’. Journal of Financial Economics 62: 525.
Deakin, Simon. 2001. ‘Regulatory Competition versus Harmonization in European Company Law’. In Daniel Esty and Damien Geradin (eds.). Regulatory Competition and Economic Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Drobetz, Wolfgang, Andreas Schillhofer and Heinz Zimmermann. 2003. ‘Corporate Governance and Expected Stock Returns: Evidence from Germany’. Working Paper. University of Basel: Department of Finance (available at <http://www.ssrn.com>).
Ebke, Werner F. 2000. ‘Centros — Some Realities and Some Mysteries’. American Journal of Comparative Law 48: 623.
Enriques, Luca. 2003. ‘Silence is Golden: The European Company Statute as a Catalyst for Company Law Arbitrage’. ECGI Working Paper (available at <http://www.ssrn.com>).
Enriques, Luca and Jonathan R. Macey. 2001. ‘Creditors Versus Capital Formation: The Case Against the European Legal Capital Rules’. Cornell Law Review 86: 1165.
European Commission. 2003. ‘Action Plan on Modernizing Company Law and Enhancing Corporate Governance in the European Union’. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament (available at <http://www.europa.eu.int>).
European Commission. 2003. ‘Reinforcing the Statutory Audit in the European Union’. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament (available at <http://europa.eu.int>).
Gilson, Ronald J. 1991. ‘The Political Economy of Takeovers: Thoughts onHarmonizing the European Corporate Governance Environment’. Fordham Law Review 61: 161.
Gilson, Ronald J. 2001. ‘Globalizing Corporate Governance: Convergence of Form or function’. American Journal of Comparative Law 49: 329.
Gompers, Paul, Joy Ishii and Andrew Metrick. 2003. ‘Corporate Governance and Equity Prices’. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 107.
Gordon, Jeffrey N. 1998. ‘Deutsche Telekom, German Corporate Governance, and the Transition Costs of Capitalism’. Columbia Business Law Review 185.
Gordon, Jeffrey N. 2003. ‘An International Relations Perspective on the Convergence of Corporate Governance: German Shareholder Capitalism and the European Union, 1990–2000’. In Jeffrey N. Gordon and Mark J. Roe (eds.). Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (forthcoming).
Grossman, Sanford J. and Oliver Hart. 1980. ‘Takeover Bids, the Free-Rider Problem, and the Theory of the Corporation’. Bell Journal of Economics 11: 42.
Grossman, Sanford J. and Oliver Hart. 1988. ‘One Share-One Vote and the Market for Corporate Control’. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 175.
Grundmann, Stefan. 2002. ‘Regulatory Competition in European Company Law — Some Different Genius?’. In Guido Ferrarini, Klaus J. Hopt and Eddy Wymeersch (eds.). Capital Markets in the Age of the EURO. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Halbhuber, Harald. 2001. ‘National Doctrinal Structures and European Company Law’. Common Market Law Review 38: 1385.
Hannes, Sharon. 2002. ‘The Hidden Virtues of Antitakeover Defenses’. Working Paper. Harvard University School of Law (available at <http://www.ssrn.com>).
Hansmann, Henry and Reinier Kraakman. 2001. ‘The End of History for Corporate Law’. Georgetown Law Journal 89: 439.
Hansmann, Henry and Reinier Kraakman. 2004a. ‘The Basic Governance Structure’. In Kraakman et al. (2004).
Hansmann, Henry and Reinier Kraakman. 2004b. ‘Agency Problems and Legal Strategies’. In Kraakman et al. (2004).
Harris, Milton and Arthur Raviv. 1988. ‘Corporate Governance: Voting Rights and Majority Rules’. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 203.
Heine, Klaus and Wolfgang Heiner. 2002. ‘European Corporate Laws, Regulatory Competition and Path Dependence’. European Journal of Law and Economics 13: 257.
Hertig, Gerard. 2001. ‘Regulatory Competition in EU Financial Services’. In Daniel Esty and Damien Geradin (eds.). Regulatory Competition and Economic Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hertig, Gerard and Hideki Kanda. 2004. ‘Creditor Protection’. In Kraakman et al. (2004).
Hertig, Gerard and Ruben Lee. 2003. ‘Four Predictions about the Future of EU Securities Regulation’. Journal of Corporate Law Studies 3: 359.
Higgs, Dennis. 2003. ‘Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Non-Executive Directors’. London: Department of Trade and Industry.
High Level Group of Company Law Experts. 2002a. Report of the High Level Group of Company Law Experts on Issues Related to Takeover Bids. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
High Level Group of Company Law Experts. 2002b. Report of the High Level Group of Company Law Experts on a Modern Regulatory Framework for Company Law in Europe. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
Hirte, Heribert. 2002. ‘Verteidigung gegen Übernahmeangebote und Rechtsschutz des Aktionärs gegen die Verteidigung’. Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht 31: 623.
Hopt, Klaus J. 2002. ‘Common Principles of Corporate Governance in Europe’. In Joseph A. McCahery, Piet Moerland, Theo Raaijmakers and Luc Renneboog (eds.). Corporate Governance Regimes: Convergence and Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hopt, Klaus J. 2003. ‘Modern Company Law and Capital Market Problems, Improving European Corporate Governance After Enron’. Journal of Corporate Law Studies 3: 221.
Inman, Robert B. and Daniel L. Rubinfeld. 1997. ‘Rethinking Federalism’. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11: 43.
Kahan Marcel and Ehud Kamar. 2002. ‘The Myth of State Competition in Corporate Law’. Stanford Law Review 55: 679.
Kahan, Marcel and Edward Rock. 2003. ‘Corporate Constitutionalism: Antitakeover Charter Provisions as Pre-Commitment’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review (forthcoming).
Kraakman, Reinier, Henry Hansmann, Gerard Hertig, Klaus Hopt, Hideki Kanda and Edward B. Rock (eds.). 2004. The Anatomy of Corporate Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press (forthcoming).
Krause, Hartmut. 2002. ‘Die Abwehr feindlicher Übernahmeangebote auf der Grundlage von Ermächtigungbeschlüssen der Hauptversammlung’. Betriebs-Berater 57: 1053.
La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer and Robert Vishny. 1997. ‘Legal Determinants of External Finance’. Journal of Finance 52: 1131.
La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer and Robert W. Vishny. 1999. ‘Corporate Ownership around the World’. Journal of Finance 54: 471.
Licht, Amir N. 2001. ‘The Mother of All Path Dependencies: Toward a Cross-Cultural Theory of Corporate Governance Systems’. Delaware Journal of Corporation Law 26: 147.
McCahery, Joseph A. and Erik P.M. Vermeulen. 2001. ‘The Evolution of Closely Held Business Forms in Europe’. Journal of Corporation Law 26: 855.
Morck, Randall, Andrei Schleifer and Robert Vishny. 1988. ‘Managerial Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis’. Journal of Financial Economics 29: 293.
Mülbert, Peter O. and Max Birke. 2002. ‘Legal Capital — Is There a Case Against the European Legal Capital Rules?’. European Business Organization Law Review 3: 695.
Pollock, Mark A. 2003. The Engines of European Integration. Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roe, Mark J. 2001. ‘Rents and their Corporate Law Consequences’. Stanford Law Review 53: 1463.
— 2002. Political Determinants of Corporate Governance. Oxford University Press.
Romano, Roberta. 1985. ‘The State Competition Debate in Corporate Law’. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 1: 225.
Romano, Roberta. 1991. The Genius of American Corporate Law. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
Romano, Roberta. 2001. ‘The Need for Competition in International Securities Regulation’. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 2: 1.
Rose, Caspar. 2002. ‘Corporate Financial Performance and the Use of Takeover Defenses’. European Journal of Law and Economics 13: 91.
Schneider, Uwe H. 2002. ‘Die Zielgesellschaft nach Abgabe eines Übernahme- oder Pflichtangebots’. Aktiengesellschaft 47: 125.
Seivt, Christop H. and Kristian J. Heiser. 2002. ‘Der neue Vorschlag einer EU-Übernahmerichtlinie und das deutsche Übernahmerecht’. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 49: 2193.
Shleifer, Andrei and Robert W. Vishny. 1986. ‘Large Shareholders and Corporate Control’. Journal of Political Economy 94: 461.
Tjiong, Henri. 2002. ‘Breaking the Spell of Regulatory Competition: Reframing the Problem of Regulatory Exit’. Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht 1: 66.
Vermeulen, Erik P. M. 2003. The Evolution of Legal Business Forms in Europe and the United States. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Wachter, Michael L. 2002. ‘Takeover Defenses when Financial Markets are (only) Relatively Efficient’. Working Paper. University of Pennsylvania Institute of Law and Economics (available at <http://www.ssrn.com>).
Weingast, Barry. 1995. ‘The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market Preserving Federalism and Economic Development’. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 1: 1.
Woolcock, Stephen. 1996. ‘Competition among Rules in the Single European Market’. In William W. Bratton, Joseph A. McCahery, Sol Picciotto and Colin Scott (eds.). International Regulatory Competition and Coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wouters, Jan. 2000. ‘European Company Law: Quo Vadis?’. Common Market Law Review 37: 257.
Wymeersch, Eddy. 1998. ‘A Status Report on Corporate Governance Rules and Practices in Some Continental European States’. In Klaus J. Hopt, Hideki Kanda, Mark J. Roe, Eddy Wymeersch and Stephen Prigge (eds.). Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of the Art and Emerging Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wymeersch, Eddy. 2004. ‘About Techniques of Company Law in the European Union’. In Guido Ferrarini, Klaus J. Hopt, Jaap Winter and Eddy Wymeersch (eds.). Modern Company and Takeover Law in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press (forthcoming).
Yarrow, George. 1985. ‘Shareholder Protection, Compulsory Acquisition, and the Takeover Process’. Journal of Industrial Economics 34: 3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hertig, G., McCahery, J.A. Company and Takeover Law Reforms in Europe: Misguided Harmonization Efforts or Regulatory Competition?. Eur Bus Org Law Rev 4, 179–211 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1566752903001794
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1566752903001794