Skip to main content
Log in

Of Collapsed, Dysfunctional and Disoriented States: Challenges to International Law

  • Published:
Netherlands International Law Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. E.g., T.D. Grant, ‘Defining Statehood: The Montevideo Convention and its Discontents’, 37 Col. J Trans. L (1999) p. 403; J. Crawford, The Creation of States in International Law (Oxford, Clarendon Press 1979); N.L. Wallace-Bruce, Claims to Statehood in International Law (New York, Carlton Press 1994) chs. 3 and 4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Anghie, ‘Finding the Peripheries: Sovereignty and Colonialism in Nineteen-Century International Law’, 40 Harvard ILJ (1999) p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Davidson, The Black Man’s Burden, Africa and the Curse of the Nation-State (London, James Currey 1992) ch. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid.; Makau wa Mutua, ‘Why Redraw the Map of Africa: A Moral and Legal Inquiry’, 16 Mich. JIL (1995) p. 1113; Wallace-Bruce, op. cit. n. 2, at ch. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Duursma, Fragmentation and the International Relations of Micro-States, Self-determination and Statehood (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 1996) p. 386.

    Google Scholar 

  6. N.L. Wallace-Bruce, ‘Taiwan and Somalia: International Legal Curiosities’, 22 Queen’s LJ (1997) p. 453.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Baker, Challenges to Traditional Concepts of Sovereignty (Occasional Paper No. 37; Readings in Comparative and International Affairs; School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, July 1999); O. Schachter, ‘The Decline of the Nation-State and its Implications for International Law’, 36 Col. J Trans. L (1997) p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See ‘Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons’, ICJ Rep. (1996) p. 226 and’ Legality of the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict’, ICJ Rep. (1996) p. 66.

  9. N.L. Wallace-Bruce, The Settlement of International Disputes, The Contribution of Australia and New Zealand (The Hague, Kluwer 1998) pp. 112–116; J.G. Merrills, International Dispute Settlement, 3rd edn. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 1998) pp. 121-123.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Art. XII of the Agreement establishing the WTO.

  11. Art. 2(7) of the UN Charter.

  12. M.J. Peterson, Recognition of Governments, Legal Doctrine and State Practice 1815–1995 (Basingstoke, Macmillan Press 1997); B.R Roth, Governmental Illegitimacy in International Law (Oxford, Clarendon Press 1999), esp. chs. 5 and 7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See generally, Roth, op. cit. n. 13, at pp. 30-35; R. Gordon, ‘United Nations Intervention in Internal Conflicts: Iraq, Somalia, and Beyond’, 15 Mich. JIL (1994) p. 519.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G.B. Helman and S.R. Ratner, ‘Saving Failed States’, 89 Foreign Policy (1992–1993) p. 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A.P. Mutharika, ‘A Symposium on Reevisioning the Security Council: Essay: The Role of the United Nations Security Council in African Peace Management: Some Proposals’, 17 Mich. JIL (1996) p. 537 at p. 561.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Idem, at p. 542.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A.P. Mutharika, ’Some Thoughts on Rebuilding African State Capability’, 76 Washington University Law Quarterly (1998) p. 281 at p. 285.

    Google Scholar 

  18. I.W. Zartman, ‘Introduction: Posing the Problem of State Collapse’, in I.W. Zartman, ed., Collapsed States: The Disintegration and Restoration of Legitimate Authority (Boulder, Col., Lynne Rienner 1995) ch. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  19. W.J. Foltz, ‘Reconstructing the State of Chad’, in Idem, at ch 2.

  20. B. Schutz, ‘The Heritage of Revolution and the Struggle for Governmental Legitimacy in Mozambique’, in Idem, at ch. 7.

  21. E. Keller,’ Remaking the Ethiopian State’, in Idem, at ch. 8.

  22. E.g., M.B. Bongartz, ‘The United Nations Intervention in Somalia’, in H.M. Adam and R Ford, eds., Mending Rips in the Sky, Options for Somali Communities in the 21st Century (Laurenceville, NJ., The Red Sea Press 1997) ch. 36; J. Chopra, A. Eknes and T. Nordbo, Fighting for Hope in Somalia (Oslo, NUPI 1995) chs. V and VI.

    Google Scholar 

  23. NGA Resolution 1746 (XVI). See also R. Higgins, The Development of International Law through the Political Organs of the United Nations (London, Oxford University Press 1963) p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mutharika, loc. cit. n. 16, at pp. 547–548; Makau wa Mutua, loc. cit. n. 5, at p. 1118.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See, e.g., N.L. Wallace-Bruce, ‘A Comparative Look at the International Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda and Weir Contribution to the Development of International Criminal Law’, 2 Journal of Chinese and Comparative Law (1996) p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Lowenkopf, ‘Liberia: Putting the State Back Together’, in Zartman, op. cit. n. 19, at ch. 6.

  27. J. Levitt, ‘Humanitarian Intervention by Regional Actors in Internal Conflicts: The Cases of ECOWAS in Liberia and Sierra Leone’, 12 Temp. Int. & Comp. LJ (1998) p. 333 at pp. 343-344.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Idem, at p. 333, fn. 54.

  29. Idem, at p. 350; Roth, op. cit. n. 13, at pp. 395-396.

  30. Lowenkopf, op. cit. n. 27, at ch. 6.

  31. Levitt, loc. cit. n. 28, at p. 365.

    Google Scholar 

  32. ‘International: The Darkest Comer of Africa’, The Economist, 9 January 1999, p. 41.

  33. K. Nowrott and E.W. Schabacker, ‘The Use of Force to Restore Democracy: International Legal Implications of the ECOMOG Intervention in Sierra Leone’, 14 Am. UILR (1998) p. 321 at p. 326.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ibid.

  35. Under the deal, the rebel leaders have returned to Sierra Leone and joined the government. See The West Australian, Wednesday, 20 October 1999, p. 24.

  36. ‘International: Waking from Sierra Leone’s Long Nightmare’, The Economist, 3 July 1999, p. 35; E. Barnes, ‘The Heart of Darkness’,Time, 25 January 1999, p. 3; The Australian, 29 September 1999, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Roth, op. cit. n. 13, at p. 406.

  38. Generally, H. Beemelmans, ‘State Succession in International Law: Remarks on Recent Theory and State Praxis’, 15 Boston UIIJ (1997) p. 71

    Google Scholar 

  39. See, e.g., I. Janev, ‘Legal Aspects of the Use of a Provisional Name for Macedonia in the United Nations System’, 93 AJIL (1999) p. 155; M.P. Scharf, ‘Musical Chairs: The Dissolution of States and Membership in the United Nations’, 28 Cornell III (1995) p. 29; V.-D. Degan, et al.,’ Correspondents’ Agora: UN Membership of the Former Yugoslavia’, 87 AJIL (1993) pp. 240-248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. See Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) (Request and Further Requests for the Indication of Provisional Measures), 95 ILR (1994) p. 1; ICJ Rep. (1993) pp. 3 and 325.

  41. Wallace-Bruce, loc. cit. n. 7, at p. 453.

    Google Scholar 

  42. I.M. Samater, ‘Light at the End of the Tunnel: Some Reflections on the Struggle of the Somali National Movement’, in Adam and Ford, op. cit. n. 23, at ch. 3; H.M. Adam,’ Somalia: A Terrible Beauty being Bom?’, in Zartman, op. cit. n. 19, at p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

  43. M. Bryden, ‘New Hope for Somalia? The Building Block Approach’, 26 Review of African Political Economy (1999) p. 134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ibid.

  45. A.I. Carroll and B. Rajagopal, ‘The Case for the Independent State of Somaliland’, 8 Am. UJIL & Poly (1993) p. 653; Samater, op. cit. n. 43, at p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  46. ‘International: A Nomad’s Life is Hard’, The Economist, 7 August 1999, p. 35.

  47. See Bryden, loc. cit. n. 44, at p. 134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. ‘International: A Failed State that is Succeeding in Parts’, The Economist, 28 August 1999, p. 33.

  49. Bryden, loc. cit. n. 44, at p. 136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. See recommendations in Adam and Ford, op. cit. n. 23, at ch. 41; R. Ford, ‘Rebuilding Somalia: A Methodology that starts from the Bottom’, in Idem, at ch. 26.

  51. Ibid.

  52. See ibid., at p. 136 for details.

  53. E.g., Makau wa Mutua, loc. cit. n. 5, at p. 1113.

  54. Generally, RA. Mortimer, ‘ECOMOG, Liberia, and Regional Security in West Africa’, in EJ. Keller and D. Rothchild, eds., Africa in the New International Order, Rethinking State Sovereignty and Regional Security (Boulder, Col., Lynne Rienner 1996) ch. 10; M.A. Vogt,’ The Involvement of ECOWAS in Liberia’s Peacekeeping’, in Idem, at ch. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  55. ECOWAS Communiqu6 of 7 August 1990 reprinted in Roth, op. cit. n. 13, at p. 396.

  56. Levitt, loc. cit. n. 28, at p. 333.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ibid., at p. 335; Nowrot and Schabacker, loc. cit. n. 34, at pp. 330-331.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Levitt, loc. cit. n. 28, at p. 373.

    Google Scholar 

  60. E.W. Schabacker, ‘The Use of Force to Restore Democracy: International Legal Implications of the ECOMOG Intervention in Sierra Leone’, 14 Am. UILR (1998) Nowrot and Schabacker, loc. cit. n. 34, at p. 400.

  61. Increasingly, however, ECOMOG lost its impartial role as it became partisan in the conflict. In the end, order and stability were restored in Liberia when ECOWAS made peace with Charles Taylor, who became president in the democratic elections which followed. See Roth, op. cit. n. 13, at p. 398.

  62. Ibid., at pp. 397 and 399; S.D. Murphy, ‘Democratic Legitimacy and the Recognition of States and Governments’, 48 I & CLQ (1999) p. 545 at p. 580; Roth, op. cit. n. 13, at p. 412.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nii Lante Wallace-Bruce.

Additional information

An earlier version of this article was presented to the African Studies Association of Australasia and the Pacific 22nd Annual/International Conference held at the University of Western Australia, 26–28 November, 1999.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wallace-Bruce, N.L. Of Collapsed, Dysfunctional and Disoriented States: Challenges to International Law. Neth Int Law Rev 47, 53–73 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0165070X00000759

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0165070X00000759

Keywords

Navigation