Advertisement

Feeding site preference of Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on maize grain

  • L. C. NwosuEmail author
  • C. O. Adedire
  • E. O. Ogunwolu
Article

Abstract

The possibility that Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky prefers a particular grain side and a grain side area for feeding, and the implications and value in maize programmes’ breeding for resistance were investigated in the laboratory at ambient temperature (32.7 °C) and relative humidity (70.4%) using standard techniques. A total of 20 elite maize varieties were used: TZBRCOMP.2C1F1, TZBRELD3C5, PVASYN-3F2, PVASYN-6F2, DTSYN-11-W, BR9943DMRSR, IWDC3SNY-W, WHITEDTSTRSYN, 2008DTMA-YSTR and 2000SYNEE-WSTR, obtained from the Maize Breeding Unit of International Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria, and ILE-1-OB, IFEMAIZEHYBRID-1, IFEMAIZEHYBRID-2, IFEMAIZEHYBRID-5, IFEMAIZEHYBRID-6, ARTCOMPOSITE-A-Y, ARTCOMPOSITE-B-Y, ART/98/SW1-OB, ART/98/SW4-OB and ART/98/SW5-OB, obtained from the Institute of Agricultural Research and Training (IAR&T), Moor Plantation, Ibadan, Nigeria. The flat side of a maize grain at the point of penetration was significantly preferred (P ≤ 0.05), possibly because it provided much needed space for anchorage and feeding. The South locus of the flattened side of a maize grain was also significantly preferred (P ≤ 0.05), possibly because of its soft nature and proximity to the nutrient-rich embryo. The findings of the study have implications for seed viability and can be considered in breeding for resistance to infestation by S. zeamais in stored maize.

Key words

elite maize varieties feeding flat side resistance viability Sitophilus zeamais 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abebe R, Tefera T., Mugo S., Beyene Y. and Vidal S. (2009) Resistance of maize varieties to the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais (Motsch.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). African Journal of Biotechnology 8, 5937–5943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adedire C. O. (2001) Biology, ecology and control of insect pests of stored cereal grains, pp. 59–94. In Pests of Stored Cereal and Pulses in Nigeria: Biology, Ecology and Control (edited by T. I. Ofuya and N. E. S. Lale). Dave Collins Publications, Akure, Nigeria.Google Scholar
  3. Adedire C. O. (2011) Insect science, global food security and environmental health. Nigerian Journal of Entomology 28, 1–6.Google Scholar
  4. Adedire C. O., Akinkurolere R. O. and Ajayi O. O. (2011) Susceptibility of some maize cultivars in Nigeria to infestation and damage by maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais (Motsch.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Nigerian Journal of Entomology 28, 55–63.Google Scholar
  5. Arthur R H. and Throne J. E. (2003) Efficacy of diatomaceous earth to control internal infestations of rice weevil and maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 96, 510–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell R. J. and Watters R L. (1982) Environmental factors influencing the development and rate of increase of Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) on stored maize. Journal of Stored Products Research 18, 131–132. doi:10.1016/0022-474X(82)90013-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Demissie G., Tefera T. and Tadesse A. (2008) Importance of husk covering on field infestation of maize by Süophilus zeamais Motsch. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) at Bako, Western Ethiopia. African Journal of Biotechnology 7, 3774–3779.Google Scholar
  8. Dobie R (1974) The laboratory assessment of the inherent susceptibility of maize varieties to post-harvest infestation by Sitophilus zeamais (Motsch.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 10, 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fajemisin J. M. (1991) Approaches to increased production of early maturing maize in semi-arid West Africa, pp. 225–231. In Influence du climat sur la production des cultures tropicales (Influence of the Climate on the Production of Tropical Crops) (edited by J. N. Wolf). International Foundation for Science (IFS)/Technical Center for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  10. Falconer D. S. (1989) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 3rd edn. Longmans, London, UK. 438 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Gadzirayi C. T., Mutandwa E. and Chikuvire T. J. (2006) Effectiveness of maize cob powder in controlling weevils in stored maize grain. African Studies Quarterly 8, 1–11. http://asq.africa.ufl.edu/files/Gadsirayi-Vol8Issue4.pdf.Google Scholar
  12. Garcia-Lara S., Bergvinson D. J., Burt A. J., Ramputh A. I., Diaz-Pontones D. M. and Arnason J. T (2004) The role of pericarp cell wall components in maize weevil resistance. Crop Science 44, 1546–1552. doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.1546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gudrups I., Floyd S., Kling J. G., Bosque-Perez N. A. and Orchard J. E. (2001) A comparison of two methods of assessment of maize varietal resistance to the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky, and the influence of kernel hardness and size on susceptibility. Journal of Stored Products Research 37, 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Halstead D. G. H. (1963) External sex differences in stored-products Coleoptera. Bulletin of Entomological Research 54, 119–134. doi:10.1017/S0007485 300048665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morah S. C. and Mbata G. N. (1982) Assessment of the relative susceptibility of some maize varieties to post-harvest infestation by the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. Nigerian Stored Product Research Institute, Technical Report 5, 63–68.Google Scholar
  16. Munyiri S. W., Mugo S. N, Otim M., Mwololo J. K. and Okori P. (2013) Mechanisms and sources of resistance in tropical maize inbred lines to Chilo partellus stem borers. Journal of Agricultural Science 5, 51–60. doi:10.5539/jas.v5n7p51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mwololo J. K., Mugo S., Okori P., Tefera T., Otim M. and Munyiri S. W. (2012) Sources of resistance to the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais in tropical maize. Journal of Agricultural Science 4, 206–215. doi:10.5539/jas.v4nllp206.Google Scholar
  18. Nadeem S., Hamed M. and Shafique M. (2011) Feeding preference and development period of some storage insect species in rice products. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 43, 79–83.Google Scholar
  19. Nwosu L. C. (2014) Evaluation of powder of weevil resistant maize as eco-friendly option in the management of Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) infestation in stored maize. Journal of Entomological Research 38, 245–250.Google Scholar
  20. Okoruwa A. E. (1992) Utilization and Processing of Maize. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (UTA) Research Guide No. 35. UTA, Ibadan. Nigeria. 27 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Sasson A. (2012) Food security for Africa: an urgent global challenge. Agriculture & Pood Security 1, 2. doi:10.1186/2048-7010-1-2.Google Scholar
  22. Shafique M. and Chaudry M. A. (2007) Susceptibility of maize grains to storage insects. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 39, 77–81.Google Scholar
  23. Sulehrie M. A. Q., Golob P., Tran B. M. D. and Farrell G (2003) The effect of attributes of Vigna spp. on the bionomics of Callosobruchus maculatus. Entomología Experimentalis et Applicata 106, 159–168. doi:10.1046/j.1570-7458.2003.00019.X.Google Scholar
  24. Tefera T., Mugo S. and Likhayo P. (2011) Effects of insect population density and storage time on grain damage and weight loss in maize due to the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais and the larger grain borer Prostephanus truncatus. African Journal of Agricultural Research 6, 2249–2254.Google Scholar
  25. Tongjura J. D. C, Amuga G. A. and Mafuyai H. B. (2010) Laboratory assessment of the susceptibility of some varieties of Zea mays infested with Sitophilus zeamais, Motsch. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria. Science World Journal 5, 55–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Transtutors (2013) work-help/biology/organs-of typical-flowering-plant/structure, http://www.transtutors.com/home (Internet information accessed on 16 May 2013).

Copyright information

© icipe 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Agriculture, MakurdiMakurdiNigeria
  2. 2.Food Storage Technology Program, Department of BiologyFederal University of TechnologyAkureNigeria
  3. 3.Department of Crop and Environmental ProtectionUniversity of AgricultureMakurdiNigeria

Personalised recommendations