Advertisement

International Journal of Tropical Insect Science

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 287–295 | Cite as

Role of recreated habitats in butterfly conservation: a case study at Thenmala, Kerala, India

  • V. S. RevathyEmail author
  • George Mathew
  • T. P. Narayanankutty
Article

Abstract

Focal species are valuable tools for evaluating management practices for biodiversity conservation. Butterfly gardening through the creation of appropriate habitats can be a primary conservation tool to increase species abundance and richness and gene flow among the populations in fragmented landscapes. In this context, the role of butterfly gardens in the conservation of butterfly populations and the seasonal population trends of swallowtail butterflies (family Papilionidae) sighted in the Butterfly Safari Park at Thenmala were studied. A total of 4760 sightings of 15 species of swallowtails belonging to five genera were recorded, of which six were endemic species, three species had protected status and two were rare species. It is worth noting that of the 19 species of the papilionids recorded in Kerala, as many as 15 species were recorded in Thenmala. Of the various species recorded, Troides minos, Pachliopta pandiyana, Pachliopta aristolochiae, Graphium agamemnon, Graphium sarpedon, Papilio polytes, Papilio clytia, Papilio demoleus and Papilio polymnestor comprised the resident populations, while species such as Atrophaneura hector, Papilio helenus, Papilio dravidarum, Papilio paris, Papilio liomedon and Graphium nomius were found only during certain seasons. The overall butterfly abundance was high from August to November. The butterfly populations exhibited a gradual decline in numbers from December onwards with the onset of dry seasons. The abundance of butterfly populations was low during March—April. The abundance of T. minos, P. pandiyana, P. polymnestor, P. paris, P. dravidarum, P. helenus, P. polytes and P. liomedon showed a significant negative correlation with monthly average temperature and a significant positive correlation with humidity.

Key words

swallowtails biodiversity butterfly gardening habitats Lepidoptera Papilionidae revegetation recreation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Achard F., Eva H. D., Stibig H. -J., Mayaux P., Gallego J., Richards T. and Malingreau J. P. (2002) Determination of deforestation rates of the world’s humid tropical forests. Science 297, 999–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blair R. B. (1999) Birds and butterflies along an urban gradient: surrogate taxa for assessing biodiversity? Ecological Applications 9, 164–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Daily G. C. (2003) Time to rethink conservation strategy. Science 300, 1508–1509. doi:10.1126/science.1085355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dale V. H., Brown S., Haeuber R. A., Hobbs N. T., Huntly N., Naiman R. J., Riebsame W. E., Turner M. G. and Valone T. J. (2000) Ecological principles and guidelines for managing the use of land. Ecological Applications 10, 639–670.Google Scholar
  5. Davies M. B., Shaw R. G. and Etterson J. R. (2005) Evolutionary responses to changing climate. Ecology 86, 1704–1714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ehrlich P. R. and Raven P. H. (1964) Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18, 586–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fleishman E., Murphy D. D. and Brussard P. F. (2000) A new method for selection of umbrella species for conservation planning. Ecological Applications 10, 569–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gaonker H. (1996) Butterflies of Western Ghats, India including Sri Lanka. A biodiversity assessment of threatened mountain system. Report to the Center for Ecological Science, Bangalore, 86 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Gilbert L. E. (1984) The biology of butterfly communities, pp. 41–54. In The Biology of Butterflies (edited by R. I. Vane-Wright and P. R. Ackery). Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  10. GOI (Government of India) (1972) The Wildlife (Protection) Act (Amendment, 1982). Controller of Publication, Government of India, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  11. Kendle T. and Forbes S. (1997) Urban Nature Conservation: Landscape Management in the Urban Countryside. Chapman & Hall, London. 352 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Koh L. P. and Navjot S. S. (2004) Importance of reserves, fragments, and parks for butterfly conservation in a tropical urban landscape. Ecological Applications 14, 1695–1708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kremen C. (1992) Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural areas monitoring. Ecological Applications 2, 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Larsen T. B. (1987 a) The Butterflies of the Nilgiri mountains of South India (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera). Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 84, 26–54.Google Scholar
  15. Larsen T. B. (1987 b) The Butterflies of the Nilgiri mountains of South India (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera). Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 84, 291–316.Google Scholar
  16. Larsen T. B. (1987 c) The Butterflies of the Nilgiri mountains of South India (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera). Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 84, 560–584.Google Scholar
  17. Larsen T. B. (1988) The Butterflies of the Nilgiri mountains of South India (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera). Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 85, 26–43.Google Scholar
  18. Manzoor F., Bin Sadat H. and Hina (2013) Butterflies as indicator of climate change. Zoo’s Print 28, 19–22.Google Scholar
  19. Marzluff J. M. (2001) Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds, pp. 19–47. In Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World (edited by J. M., Marzluff R. Bowmanand R. Donnelly). Kluwer, Norwell, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mathew G. and Anto M. (2007) In situ conservation of butterflies through establishment of butterfly gardens: a case study at Peechi, Kerala, India. Current Science 93, 337–347.Google Scholar
  21. McKinney M. L. (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. BioScience 52, 883–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller J. R. and Hobbs R. J. (2002) Conservation where people live and work. Conservation Biology 16, 330–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ngongolo K. and Mtoka S. (2013) Using butterflies to measure biodiversity health in Wazo hill restored quarry. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 1, 81–86.Google Scholar
  24. Pollard E. (1977) A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biological Conservation 12, 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pollard E. and Yates T. J. (1993) Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation. Chapman & Hall, London. 274 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Ricketts T. H., Daily G. C. and Ehrlich P. R. (2002) Does butterfly diversity predict moth diversity? Testing a popular indicator taxon at local scales. Biological Conservation 103, 361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosenzweig M. L. (2003) Win—Win Ecology: How the Earth’s Species Can Survive in the Midst of Human Enterprise. Oxford University Press, New York. 224 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Sheil D. and Burslem D. F. R. P. (2003) Disturbing hypotheses in tropical forests. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18, 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Spitzer K., Jaroš J., Havelka J. and Lepš J. (1997) Effect of small-scale disturbance on butterfly communities of an Indochinese montane rainforest. Biological Conservation 80, 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Spitzer K., Novotny V., Tonner M. and Lepš J. (1993) Habitat preferences, distribution and seasonality of the butterflies (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea) in a montane tropical rain forest, Vietnam. Journal of Biogeography 20, 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stein B. A., Kutner L. S. and Adams J. S. (eds) (2000) Precious Heritage: The Status of Biodiversity in the United States. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 432 pp.Google Scholar
  32. Thomas J. A. (1995) The ecology and conservation of Maculinea arion and other European species of large blue butterfly, pp. 180–197. In Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies (edited by A. S. Pullin). Chapman & Hall, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wynter-Blyth M. A. (1957) Butterflies of the Indian Region. Bombay Natural History Society, xx + 523, 72 pls.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICIPE 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. S. Revathy
    • 1
    Email author
  • George Mathew
    • 1
  • T. P. Narayanankutty
    • 2
  1. 1.Forest Health divisionKerala Forest Research InstitutePeechiIndia
  2. 2.Kerala Forests and Wildlife DepartmentKeralaIndia

Personalised recommendations