Variability of the potency of some selected entomopathogenic bacteria (Bacillus spp. and Serratia spp.) on termites, Macrotermes bellicosus (Isoptera: Termitidae) after exposure to magnetic fields

  • F. O. OmoyaEmail author
  • B. A. Kelly
Research Paper


In this study, the effect of exposing entomopathogenic bacteria isolated from macerated termite cadavers to varying intensities of a magnetic field for different periods of time on their pathogenic potential was examined; pathogenicity tests were carried out for each of the bacterial species. Two of the bacteria, Bacillus subtilis (Ehrenberg) Cohn and Serratia marcescens Bizio, were able to induce morbid effects on termites and both were re-isolated from the resulting cadavers. Reinfection using different concentrations of both bacteria was carried out on termites to determine the minimum lethal concentration required for pathogenicity. Bacillus subtilis was able to degenerate the termites at concentration values of 108 colony-forming units (cfu)/ml and S. marcescens at 107 cfu/ml. Both bacteria were then exposed to magnetic fields of different intensities for different periods of time, after which they were used for reinfection of healthy termites. Postinfection study after the exposure of termites to magnetic field-treated bacterial cells revealed no reduction in the entomopathogenic potency of S. marcescens. As the extensive use of chemicals to control insect pests has been found to have detrimental effects on people and the environment, there is a pressing need to discover and develop new entomopathogens to control these insects biologically. Therefore, bacteria discovered in this study to have entomopathogenic potency against termites may be further studied and formulated into either powdery forms or suspensions to be applied to infested wood or wood products.

Key words

entomopathogens electromagnetic fields Bacillus subtilis Serratia marcescens 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Backman P. A., Wilson M. and Murphy J. R (1997) Bacteria for biological control of plant diseases, pp. 95–109. In Environmentally Safe Approaches to Crop Disease Control (Edited by J. E. Rechcigl and N. A. Rechcigl). CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  2. Barnett J. A., Payne R. W. and Yarrow D. (2000) Yeast: Characteristics and Identification, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 1150 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Cornelius M. L. and Osbrink W. L. A. (2001) Tunneling behavior, foraging tenacity, and wood consumption rates of Formosan and Eastern subterranean termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in laboratory bioassays. Sociobiology 37, 79–94.Google Scholar
  4. Engel M. S. and Krishna K. (2004) Family-group names for termites (Isoptera). American Museum Novitates 3432, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fawole M. O. and Oso B. A. (2001) Laboratory Manual in Microbiology, 3rd edn. Spectrum Books Ltd, Ibadan. 127 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Gerencer V. F., Barnothy M. E and Barnothy J. M. (1962) Inhibition of bacterial growth by magnetic fields. Nature 196, 539–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harazono K., Yamashita N., Shinzato N., Watanabe Y., Fukatsu T. and Kurane R. (2003) Isolation and characterization of aromatics-degrading microorganisms from the gut of the lower termite Coptotermes formosanus. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry 67, 889–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harrigan W. F. (1998) Laboratory Methods in Food Microbiology, 3rd edn. Academic Press Ltd, San Diego, California. 532 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Lacey L. A. and Brooks W. M. (1997) Initial handling and diagnosis of diseased insects, pp. 1–15. In Manual of Techniques in Insect Pathology (Biological Techniques Series) (edited by L. A. Lacey). Academic Press Ltd, San Diego, California. ISBN 0-12-432555-6.Google Scholar
  10. Lacey A. L. and Joel P. S. (2000) Entomopathogenic bacteria from laboratory to field application. In Safety and Ecotoxicology of Entomopathogenic Bacteria, pp. 253–273. Springer, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  11. Mulla M. S. (1991) Biological control of mosquitoes with entomopathogenic bacteria. In Chinese Journal of Entomology (Special Publication No. 6). Proceedings of the IVth National Vector Control Symposium, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC, pp. 93–104.Google Scholar
  12. Osbrink W. L. A., Williams K. S., Connick W. J., Wright M. S. and Lax A. R. (2001) Virulence of bacteria associated with the Formosan subterranean termite (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in New Orleans, LA, USA. Environmental Entomology 30, 443–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pothakamury U. R., Babosa-Canovas G. V. and Swanson B. G. (1993) Magnetic field inactivation of microorganisms and generation of biological changes. Pood Technology 47, 85–93.Google Scholar
  14. Potter M. (1997) Termites, pp. 232–332. In Handbook of Pest Control (edited by D. Moreland), 8th rev. edn. Mallis Handbook and Technical Training Company, GIE Media, Cleveland, Ohio.Google Scholar
  15. Samish M., Ginsberg H. and Glazer I. (2004) Biological control of ticks. Parasitology 129, S389–S403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. SIP [Society for Invertebrate Pathology] (2008) Program and Abstracts—41st Annual Meeting of the Society for Invertebrate Pathology and 9th International Conference on Bacillus thuringiensis Incorporating COST862 Action: Bacterial Toxins for Insect Control, 3–7 August 2008, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK. Available at: Scholar
  17. Tsunoda K., Ohmura W. and Yoshimura T. (1993) Methane emissions by the termite, Coptotermes formosanus (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). (II) Presence of methanogenic bacteria and effect of food on methane emission rates. Japanese Journal of Environmental Entomology and Zoology 27, 45–49.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICIPE 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal University of TechnologyAkureNigeria
  2. 2.Wesley University of Science and TechnologyOndoNigeria

Personalised recommendations