Advertisement

The Ultrastructure of the Trifoliate Process of some Species of Atherigona (Diptera: Muscidae)

  • M. C. Dike
Research Article

Abstract

The fine structure of the trifoliate process of three species of Atherigona were studied. The outer surface of the lateral lobe of the process for the three species, A. bedfordi, A. hyalinipennis and A. secrecauda is covered with a dense mat of hairs. There are spine-like outgrowths on their inner surface referred to as “commasets” as well as some unusual sensilla on the rim of the lateral lobe and the section connecting the lobes to the stem. These structures showed inter-specific variation. The stem of the process is glabrous and granulate in A. bedfordi and A. secrecauda, but sparsely pilose in A. hyalinipennis.

Key Words

Atherigona trifoliate process ultrastructure 

Résumé

La structure raffinées du procédé trifoliate des trois espèces de l’Atherigona ont été recherchées. L’extérieure du lobe lateral du procédé des trois espèces: A. bedfordi, A. hyalinipennis et A. secrecauda, est couvert d’une natte épaise des poils. Il y a des excroissances rassemblantes des épines à l’intérieur qu’on appelle des “commasets”, aussi bien que certaines rares sensilla au bord du lobe lateral et la section qui rattache les lobes à queue. Ces structures ont exposé à la variation interspécifique. La queue du procédé est glabreux et granulée avec A. bedfordi et A. secrecauda, mais d’une mainère poilue éparse avec A. hyalinipennis.

Mots Clés

Atherigona trifoliate process ultrastructure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clearwater J. R., Thiel F. and Kokwaro E. D. (1981) Comparative ultrastructure of the trifoliate organ of Atherigona Rondani (Diptera: Muscidae). Insect Sci. Applic. 2, 11–23.Google Scholar
  2. Deeming J. C. (1971) Some species of Atherigona Rondani (Diptera: Muscidae) from northern Nigeria, with special reference to those injuries to cereal crops. Bull. Entomol. Res. 61, 133–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deeming J. C. (1975) Three new African species of Atherigona Rondani (Diptera: Muscidae). Nigerian J. Entomol. 1, 147–151.Google Scholar
  4. Deeming J. C. (1979) New and little known species of Atherigona Rondani (Diptera: Muscidae) from Nigeria and Cameroun. Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine 114, 31–51.Google Scholar
  5. Deeming J. C. (1981) New and little known species of Atherigona Rondani (Diptera: Muscidae). Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine 117, 99–114.Google Scholar
  6. Dike M. C. (1987) Taxonomic studies on Afrotropical shootflies of the genus Atherigona Rondani (Diptera: Muscidae). Ph.D. Thesis. University of Wales.Google Scholar
  7. Dike M. C. (1988) The fine structure and function of the trifoliate process of Atherigona Rondani (Diptera: Muscidae). Abstracts of Papers of the 18th Annu. Conf. Nigerian Soc. Plant Prot.Google Scholar
  8. Dike M. C (1989a) Some new species of Atherigona Rondani (Diptera: Muscidae) from Africa. Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine 125, 73–79.Google Scholar
  9. Dike M. C. (1989b) A key for the identification of Afrotropical species of the shootfly subgenus Atherigona of Atherigona (Diptera: Muscidae), with a description of some new species from Africa. Bull. Entomol. Res. 79, 545–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Emden F. I. van (1940) Ruwenzori Expedition, 1934–1935 Muscidae B. Coenosiinae British Museum (Natural History), London 2, 91–255.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICIPE 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. C. Dike
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity College of WalesCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations