Relative Efficiency of Some Mechanical Traps Used in the Study of the Tsetse Species, Glossina Pallidipes Austen

  • Mary L. A. Owaga


The biconical trap of Challier and Laveissièr was compared with Langridge’s box screen (LBS) and Moloo’s awning screen skirt (ASS) for relative efficiency in catching the tsetse species, Glossina pallidipes Austen, in two areas in Kenya. The dark blue biconical trap performed better than the ASS in one area, but both of them caught more males than females. In the other area, the sky blue version of the biconical gave higher yields than LBS and the white biconical. In both areas, the white biconical trap caught the highest proportion of old flies, while ASS caught the highest proportion of young flies. The biconical trap is preferable because it is collapsible, easy to handle and transport, and needs minimal manpower to operate, unlike the LBS and ASS.

Key Words

Trapping devices relative efficiency mechanical traps trap yields sex ratios age structure locality site effects and hunger stage 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bursell E. (1961) The behaviour of tsetse flies, G. swynner-toni Austen in relation to problems of sampling. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 36, 9–20.Google Scholar
  2. Bursell E. (1977) Tryponosomiasis in Southern Africa. In: Medicine in a Tropical Environment (Ed. by Gear J. S. H.), pp. 562–564. A. A. Belkema, Cape Town.Google Scholar
  3. Challier A. and Laveissi Ere C. (1973) Un nouveau piege pour la capture des glossines (Glossina: Diptera; Musci-dae) description et assais sur le terrain. Cah O.R.S.T.O.M. Ser. Ent. med. Parasitol. 11, 251–262.Google Scholar
  4. Challier A., Eyraud M., Lafaye A. and Laveissi Ere C. (1977) Amelioration du rendement due piege biconique pour glossines (Diptera, Glossinidae) par l’emploi d’un cône inferieur bleu. Cah. O.R.S.T.O.M., Ser Ent. med et Parasitol. 15, 283–286.Google Scholar
  5. Fiske W. F. (1920) Investigations into the binomics of Glossina palpalis. Bull. ent. Res. 10, 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glasgow J. P. and Duffy B. J. (1961) Traps in field studies of Glossina pallidipes Austen. Bull. ent. Res. 52, 795–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jack R. W. and Williams W. L. (1938) Effect of temperature on the reaction of Glossina morsitans West. to light. Bull ent. Res. 28, 443–482.Google Scholar
  8. Jackson C. H. C. (1933) The causes and implications of hunger in tsetse flies. Bull. ent. Res. 24, 443–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jackson C. H. C. (1949) The biology of tsetse flies. Biol. Rev. 24, 174–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Moloo S. K. (1973) A new trap for Glossina pallidipes Aus. and G. fuscipes Newst. (Diptera, Glossinidae). Bull. ent. Res. 63, 131–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Saunders D. S. (1964) The effect of site and sampling method on the size and composition of catches of tsetse flies, Glossina and Tabanidae. Bull. ent. Res. 55, 483–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Vale G. A. (1974) The responses of tsetse flies to mobile and stationary baits. Bull. ent. Res. 64, 545–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICIPE 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary L. A. Owaga
    • 1
  1. 1.International Centre of Insect Physiology and EcologyNairobiKenya

Personalised recommendations