Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of graft patency by computed tomographic angiography in symptom-free post-coronary artery bypass surgery patients

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Accelerated atherosclerosis occurs in aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts, contributing to increased morbidity and mortality rates. We estimated the prevalence of asymptomatic graft failure in patients 5 years or more after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using electron-beam computed tomographic angiography (EBA).

Methods and Results

EBA was performed in 45 symptom-free patients (mean age, 66±9 year; 87% male; mean time interval after CABG, 8±5 years). A total of 102 vein grafts and 37 internal mammary artery grafts were evaluated. Patients with graft stenosis or occlusion on EBA underwent myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and invasive angiography. Six grafts were unevaluable by EBA. Twenty patients had evidence of graft stenosis or occlusion on EBA. Of 20 asymptomatic patients with graft disease, 17 (85 %) had abnormal myocardial perfusion, with moderate to severe reversible ischemia occurring in one third of subjects. Fourteen occluded and eleven stenosed vein grafts were correctly diagnosed by EBA. There were 2 false-positive EBA diagnoses of graft stenosis, resulting in a 100 % positive predictive accuracy for detecting graft occlusion and 85% positive predictive accuracy for detecting graft stenosis. All occluded internal mammary artery grafts (n=3) were accurately diagnosed.

Conclusion

Computed tomographic coronary angiography permits reliable identification of by pass graft stenoses and occlusion in symptom-free patients more than 5 years after CABG. Future studies are needed to assess the prognostic benefit of early detection of graft disease and intervention in asymptomatic patients

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Friday G, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K. et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee: and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2007; 115:e69–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Motwani JG, Topol EJ. Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft disease: pathogenesis, predisposition, and prevention. Circulation 1998;97:916–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fitzgibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach AJ, Keon WJ, Hooper D, Burton JR. Coronary artery bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1388 patients during 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:616–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenberg BH, Hart R, Botvinik EH, Werner JA, Brundage BH, Shames DM, et al. Thallium-201 myocardial perfusion scintigraphy to evaluate patients after coronary bypass surgery. Am J Cardiol 1978;42:167–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Palmas W, Bingham S, Diamond GA, Denton TA, Kiat H, Friedman JD. et al. Incremental prognostic value of exercise thallium-201 single photon emission myocardial perfusion scintigraphy late after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:403–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lauer MS, Lytle B, Pashkow F, Snader CE, Marwick TM. Prediction of death and myocardial infarction by screening with exercise-thallium testing after coronary artery bypass grafting. Lancet 1998;351:615–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D, Nossen J, Bachmann K. Noninvasive, three-dimensional visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts by electron beam tomography. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79;856–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chiurlia E, Menozzi M, Ratti C, Romagnoli R, Modena MG. Follow-up of coronary artery bypass graft patency by multislice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2005;95:1094–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pache G, Saueressig U, Frydrychowicz A, Foell D, Ghanem N, Kotter E. et al. Initial experience with 64-slice cardiac CT: non-invasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts. Eur Heart J 2006;27:976–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Budoff M, Lu B, Shinbane JS, Chen L, Child J, Carson S. et al. Methodology for improved detection of coronary stenoses with computed tomographic angiography. Am Heart J 2004;148:1085–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu B, Mao SS, Zhuang N, Bakhsheshi H, Yamamoto H, Takasu J, et al. Coronary artery motion during the cardiac cycle and optimal ECG triggering for coronary artery imaging. Invest Radiol 2001; 36:250–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hunold P, Vogt FM, Schmermund A, Debatin JF, Kerkhoff G, Budde T. et al. Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT. Radiology 2003;226:145–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weintraub WS, Jones EL, Craver JM, Guyton RA. Frequency of repeat coronary bypass or coronary angioplasty after coronary artery bypass surgery using saphenous vein grafts. Am J Cardiol 1994;73:103–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dubach P, Froelicher V, Klein J, Detrano R. Use of the exercise test to predict prognosis after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 1989;63:530–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Weiner DA, Ryan TJ, Parsons L, Fisher LD, Chaitman BR, Sheffield LT. et al. Prevalence and prognostic significance of silent and symtomatic ischemia after coronary by pass surgery: a report from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) randomized population. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;18:343–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, Bateman TM, Messer JV, Berman DS. et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging—executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). Circulation 2003;108:1404–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brindis RG, Douglas PS, Hendel RC, Peterson ED, Wolk MJ, Allen JM. et al. ACCF/ASNC appropriateness for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:1587–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nallamouthu N, Johnson JH, Bagheri B, Heo J, Iskandrian AE. et al. Utility of stress single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging in predicting outcome after coronary artery by pass grafting. Am J Cardiol 1997;80:1517–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sarda L, Fuchs L, Lebtahi R, Faraggi M, Delahaye N, Hyass U, et al. Prognostic value of 201 Tl myocardial scintigraphy after coronary artery by pass grafting. Nucl Med Commun 2001;22: 189–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zellweger MJ, Lewin HC, Lai S, Dubois EA, Friedman JD, Germano G. et al. When to stress patients after coronary artery bypass surgery? Risk stratification in patients early and late post-CABG using stress myocardial perfusion SPECT: implications of appropriate clinical strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:144–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Buteman TM, Gray RJ, Whiting JS, Matloff JM, Berman DS, Forrester JS. et al. Cine computed tomographic evaluation of aortocoronary bypass graft patency. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;8: 693–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lu B, Dai RP, Zhuang N, Budoff MJ. Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft patency and flow characteristics by electron-beam tomography. J Invasive Cardiol 2002;14:19–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stanford W, Brundage BH, MacMillan R, Chomka EV, Bateman TM, Eldredge WJ. et al. Sensitivity and specificity of assessing of coronary artery bypass graft patency with ultrafast computed tomography results of a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;12:1–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ropers D, Ulzheimer S, Wenkel E, Baum U, Giesler T, Achenbach S. Investigation of aortocoronary bypass grafts by multislice spiral computed tomography with electrocardiographic-gated image reconstruction. Am J Cardiol 2001;88:792–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D'Eliseo A, Tomassini M, Razzini C, Sperandio M. et al. Evaluation of venous and arterial graft patency using 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2004;110: 3234–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ropers D, Pohle FK, Kuettner A, Pfederer T, Anders K, Daniel WG. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 330-ms gantry rotation. Circulation 2006; 114:2334–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hacker M, Jakobs T, Mattheisen F, Vollamar C, Nilolaou K, Becker C. et al. Comparison of spiral multidetector CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging in the noninvasive detection of functionally relevant coronary artery lesions: first clinical experiences. J Nucl Med 2005;46:1294–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hacker M, Jakobs T, Hack N, Nilolaou K, Becker C, von Zeigler F. et al. Sixty-four slice spiral CT angiography does not predict the functional relevance of coronary artery stenoses in patients with stable angina. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007;34:4–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Koepfli P, Valenta I, Soyka J, Leschka S. et al. Accuracy of 64-slice CT angiography for the detection of functionally relevant coronary stenoses as assessed with myocardial perfusion SPECT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007, 34: 1097–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schuijf JD, Wijns W, Jukema JW, Atsma DE, de Roos A, Lamb HJ. et al. Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:2508–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman D. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 2003;107:2900–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Duerinckx A. Clinical utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance techniques for noninvasive coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42: 1867–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dhakshinamurthy Vijay Anand.

Additional information

The study was supported by research grants from the Harrow Cardiovascular Research Trust

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anand, D.V., Lim, E., Lipkin, D. et al. Evaluation of graft patency by computed tomographic angiography in symptom-free post-coronary artery bypass surgery patients. J Nucl Cardiol 15, 201–208 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.10.007

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.10.007

Key Words

Navigation