Skip to main content
Log in

Use of coronary calcium scanning for predicting inducible myocardial ischemia: Influence of patients’ clinical presentation

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

The selection of patients for cardiac stress tests is generally based on assessment of chest pain symptoms, age, gender, and risk factors, but recent data suggest that coronary artery calcium (CAC) measurements can also be used to predict inducible myocardial ischemia. However, the potential influence of clinical factors on the relationship between CAC measurements and inducible ischemia has not yet been investigated.

Methods and Results

We prospectively performed CAC scanning in 648 patients undergoing exercise myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. The frequency of ischemia on myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography was assessed according to CAC magnitude after dividing patients according to chest pain symptom class and Bayesian likelihood of angiographically significant coronary artery disease (ASCAD), Estimates of ASCAD likelihood and CAC scores were poorly correlated. The frequency of inducible myocardial ischemia was very low among patients with a low ASCAD likelihood if CAC scores were less than 400. By contrast, the threshold for increasing ischemia occurred at low CAC scores among patients with a high ASCAD likelihood. When characterized by chest pain classification, asymptomatic and nonanginal chest pain patients had a low frequency of ischemia if CAC scores were less than 400, whereas lower CAC scores did not exclude ischemia among typical angina or atypical angina patients.

Conclusions

CAC scores predict myocardial ischemia, with a threshold score of greater than 400 among patients with a low likelihood of ASCAD and those who are asymptomatic or have nonanginal chest pain. These data appear to extend the pool of patients for whom CAC scanning may be useful in ascertaining the need for cardiac stress testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rozanski A., Berman DS. The efficacy of cardiovascular nuclear medicine studies. Semin Nucl Med 1987;27:104–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging— executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1318–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Diamond GA, Denton TA, Berman DS, Cohen I. Prior restraint: a Bayesian perspective on the optimization of technology utilization for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1995;76:82–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenland P, Bonow RO, Brundage BH, Bundoff MJ, Eisenberg MJ, Grundy SM, et al. ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography). Circulation 2007;115:402–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson PWF, Smith SC Jr, Blumenthal RS, Burke GL, Wong ND. 34th Bethesda Conference task force #4—how do we select patients for atherosclerosis imaging? J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1898–906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Berman DS, Haehamovitch R, Shaw LJ, et al. Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: assessment of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med 2006;47:74–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Berman DS, Wong ND, Gransar H, et al. Relationship between stress-induced myocardial ischemia and atherosclerosis measured by coronary calcium tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:923–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. He ZX, Hedrick TD, Pratt CM, et al. Severity of coronary artery calcification by electron beam computed tomography predicts silent myocardial ischemia. Circulation 2000;101:244–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moser KW, O’Keefe JH Jr, Bateman TM, McGhie IA. Coronary calcium screening in asymptomatic patients as a guide to risk factor modification and stress myocardial perfusion imagine. J Nucl Cardiol 2003;10:590–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Anand JV, Lim E, Raval U, Lipkin D, Lahiri A. Prevalence of silent myocardial ischemia in asymptomatic individuals with subclinical atherosclerosis detected by electron beam tomography. J Nucl Cardiol 2004;11:450–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Diamond GA, Pollock BH, Work JW. Clinician decisions and computers. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;9:1385–96.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Berman DS, Kiat H, Friedman JD, et al. Separate acquisition rest thallium-201/stress technetium-99m sestamibi dual-isotope myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography: a clinical validation study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22 1455–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman DS. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 2003;107:2900–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:827–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Raggi P, Callister TQ, Cooil B, et al. Identification of patients at increased risk of first unheralded acute myocardial infarction by electron-beam computed tomography. Circulation 2000;101: 850–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Parsons LS. Reducing bias in a propensity score matched-pair sample using greedy matching techniques. Paper 214-26. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SAS Users Group International Conference. Cary (NC): SAS Institute; 2000. Available from: URL: http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi26/p214-26 pdf. Accessed July 22, 2006.

  17. D’Agostino RB Jr. Tutorial in biostatistics propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 1998;17:2265–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Abidov A, Rozanski A, Hachamovitch R, et al. Prognostic significance of dyspnea in patients referred for cardiac stress testing. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1889–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Appels A, Mulder P. Excess fatigue as a precursor of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 1988;9:758–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cole SR, Kawachi I, Sesso HD, Paffenbarger RS, Lee IM. Sense of exhaustion and coronary heart disease among college alumni. Am J Cardiol 1999;84:1401–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rugulies R. Depression as a predictor for coronary heart disease. A review and meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med 2002;23:51–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Leineweber C, Kecklund G, Janszky I, Akerstedt T, Orth-Gomer K. Poor sleep increases the prospective risk for recurrent events in middle-aged women with coronary disease: the Stockholm Female Coronary Risk Study. J Psychosom Res 2003;54:121–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rozanski A, Blumenthal JA, Davidson KW, Saab PG, Kubzansky L. The epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of psychosocial risk facters in cardiac practice: the emerging field of behavioral cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:637–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Christopher Jones R, Pothier CE, Blackstone EH, Lauer MS. Prognostic importance of presenting symptoms in patients undergoing exercise testing for evaluation of known or suspected coronary disease. Am J Med 2004;117:380–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rozanski A, Diamond GA, Forrester JS, Berman D, Morris D, Swan HJC. Comparison of alternative referent standards for cardiac normality. Implications for diagnostic testing. Ann Intern Med 1984;101:164–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rozanski A, Diamond GA, Berman D, Forrester JS, Morris D, Swan HJ. The deelining specificity of exercise radionuclide ventriculography. N Engl J Med 1983;309:518–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ransohoff DF, Feinstein AR. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic test. N Engl J Med 1978;299: 926–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wong ND, Rozanski A, Gransar H, et al. Metabolic syndrome and diabetes are associated with an increased likelihood of inducible myocardial ischemia among patients with subelinical atheroscierosis. Diabetes Care 2005;28:1445–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sudoff MB, Diamand GA, Ragl P, et al. Continuous probabillatic prediction of angiographically significant coronary artery disease using electron beam tomography. Circulation 2002;105:1791–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rozanski A, Gransar H, Wong ND, et al. Clinical outcomes following both coronary artery calcium scanning and exercise myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1352–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rozanski A, Diamond GA, Forrester JS, Berman DS, Morris D, Jones RH, et al. Should the intent of testing influence its interpretation? J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:17–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Diamond GA, Denton TA, Bennan DS, Cohen I. Prior restraint: a Bayesian perspective on the optimization of technology utilization for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1995;76:82–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Shaw LJ, et al. Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: assessment of patients with suspected coronary disease. J Nucl Med 2006;47:74–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Berman DS, Shaw L, Hachamovitch R, et al. Comparative use of radionuclide stress testing, coronary anery calcium scanning, and noninvasive coronary angiography for diagnostic and prognostic cardiac assessment. Semin Nucl Med 2007;37:2–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel S. Berman.

Additional information

This study was supported by a grant from the Eisner Foundation, Los Angeles. Calif.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rozanski, A., Gransar, H., Wong, N.D. et al. Use of coronary calcium scanning for predicting inducible myocardial ischemia: Influence of patients’ clinical presentation. J Nucl Cardiol 14, 669–679 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.07.005

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.07.005

Key words

Navigation