Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Diagnostic impact of SPECT image display on assessment of obstructive coronary artery disease

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Diagnostic assessment of myocardial perfusion impacts the management of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Although various image displays are available for single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) interpretation, the effects of display differences on SPECT interpretation remain undetermined.

Methods and Results

We studied 183 patients undergoing SPECT, including 131 consecutive patients referred for angiography and 52 at low CAD risk. Studies were visually interpreted by use of color and gray images, with readers blinded to the results of the other display. In accordance with established criteria, a summed stress score (SSS) of 4 or greater was considered abnormal. The prevalence of abnormal SPECT findings was higher with gray images than with color images (54% vs 48%, P<.001) based on a uniform criterion (SSS≥4). However, color images yielded equivalent sensitivity (79% vs 82%, P=.7) and improved specificity for global (50% vs 33%, P=.02) and vessel-specific CAD involving the right coronary artery (P<.01) and left anterior descending artery (P<.05). When the criterion for gray images was adjusted upward (SSS≥5) to reflect increased mean defect severity (SSS of 5.1 vs 4.4, P=.01), gray and color images provided equivalent sensitivity and specificity for global and vessel-specific CAD.

Conclusions

SPECT interpretation can vary according to image display as a result of differences in perfusion defect severity. Adjustment of abnormality criteria for gray images to reflect minor increases in defect severity provides equivalent diagnostic performance of gray and color displays for CAD assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Kiat H, Cohen I, Cabico JA, Friedman J, et al. Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease: incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratification. Circulation 1996;93:905–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Kiat H, Cohen I, Lewin H, Amanullah A, et al. Incremental prognostic value of adenosine stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography and impact on subsequent management in patients with or suspected of having myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol 1997;80:426–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vanzetto G, Ormezzano O, Fagret D, Comet M, Denis B, Machecourt J. Long-term additive prognostic value of thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical and exercise stress test in low to intermediate risk patients: study in 1137 patients with 6-year follow-up. Circulation 1999;100:1521–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shaw LJ, Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Marwick TH, Lauer MS, Heller GV, et al. The economic consequences of available diagnostic and prognostic strategies for the evaluation of stable angina patients: an observational assessment of the value of precatheterization ischemia. Economics of Noninvasive Diagnosis (END) Multicenter Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:661–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Borges-Neto S, Mahmarian JJ, Jain A, Roberts R, Verani MS. Quantivative thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography after oral dipyridamole for assessing the presence, anatomic location and severity of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;11:962–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Segall GM, Atwood JE, Botvinick EH, Dae MW, Lucas JR. Variability of normal coronary anatomy: implications for the interpretation of thallium-SPECT myocardial perfusion images in single-vessel disease. J Nucl Med 1995;36:944–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kang X, Berman DS, Lewin HC, Miranda R, Agafitei R, Cohen I, et al. Comparative localization of myocardial ischemia by exercise electrocardiography and myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2000;7:140–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Candell-Riera J, Santana-Boado C, Bermejo B, Armadans L, Castell J, Casans I, et al. Interhospital observer agreement in interpretation of exercise myocardial Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT studies. J Nucl Cardiol 2001;8:49–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Berman DS, Kiat H, Friedman JD, Wang FP, van Train K, Matzer L, et al. Separate acquisition rest thallium-201/stress technetium-99m sestamibi dual-isotope myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography: a clinical validation study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:1455–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bogaty P, Guimond J, Robitaille NM, Rousseau L, Simard S, Rouleau JR, et al. A reappraisal of exercise electrocardiographic indexes of the severity of ischemic heart disease: angiographic and scintigraphic correlates. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:1497–504.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pereztol-Valdes O, Candell-Riera J, Santana-Boado C, Angel J, Aguade-Bruix S, Castell-Conesa J, et al. Correspondence between left ventricular 17 myocardial segments and coronary arteries. Eur Heart J 2005;26:2637–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med 1979;300:1350–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Slomka PJ, Fish MB, Lorenzo S, Nishina H, Gerlach J, Berman DS, et al. Simplified normal limits and automated quantitative assessment for attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion SPECT J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13:642–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Garcia EV, Cooke CD, Van Train KF, Folks R, Peifer J, DePuey EG, et al. Technical aspects of myocardial SPECT imaging with technetium-99m sestamibi. Am J Cardiol 1990;66:23E-31E.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hansen CL, Goldstein RA, Berman DS, Churchwell KB, Cooke CD, Corbett JR, et al. Myocardial perfusion and function single photon emission computed tomography. J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13:e97–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105:539–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, Daley J, Deedwania PC, Douglas JS, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina—summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). Circulation 2003;107:149–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Berman DS, Abidov A, Kang X, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Sciammarella MG, et al. Prognostic validation of a 17-segment score derived from a 20-segment score for myocardial perfusion SPECT interpretation. J Nucl Cardiol 2004;11:414–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wackers FJ, Sodenheimer M, Fleins JL, Brown M. Factors affecting uniformity in interpretation of planar thallium-201 imaging in a multicenter trial. The Multicenter Study on Silent Myocardial Ischemia (MSSMI) Thallium-201 Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:1064–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Bateman TM, Carabello BA, Cerqueira MD, DeMaria AN, et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Radionuclide Imaging). American College of Cardiology Web site, 2003, Available from: URL: http://www.acc.org/clinical/guidelines/radio/rni_fulltext.pdf

  21. Johansen A, Hoiland-Carlsen PF, Christemen HW, Vach W, Jorgensen HB, Veje A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging in a study population without post-test referral bias. J Nucl Cardiol 2005;12:530–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rodes-Cabau J, Candell-Riera J, Angel J, de Leon G, Pereztol O, Castell-Conesa J, et al. Relation of myocardial perfusion defects and nonsignificant coronary lesions by angiography with insights from intravascular ultrasound and coronary pressure measurements. Am J Cardiol 2005;96:1621–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Verna E, Ceriani L, Giovanella L, Binaghi G, Garancini S. “Falsepositive” myocardial perfusion scintigraphy findings in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries: insights from intravascular sonography studies. J Nucl Med 2000;41:1935–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Machecourt J, Longere P, Fagret D, Vanzetto G, Wolf JE, Polidori C, et al. Prognostic value of thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomographie myocardial perfusion imaging according to extent of myocardial defect. Study in 1,926 patients with follow-up at 33 months. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:1096–106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Slomka PJ, Nishina H, Berman DS, Akincioglu C, Abidov A, Friedman JD, et al. Automated quantification of myocardial perfusion SPECT using simplified normal limits. J Nucl Cardiol 2005;12:66–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Iskander S, Iskandrian AE. Risk assessment using single-photon emission computed tomographic technetium-99m sestamibi imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:57–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 525 E 68th St, Starr-445, 10021, New York, NY, USA

    Jonathan W. Weinsaft, Christopher L. Gade, Franklin J. Wong, Han W. Kim, James K. Min, Shant J. Manoushagian, Peter M. Okin & Massimiliano Szulc

Authors
  1. Jonathan W. Weinsaft
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christopher L. Gade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Franklin J. Wong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Han W. Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. James K. Min
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shant J. Manoushagian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Peter M. Okin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Massimiliano Szulc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan W. Weinsaft.

Additional information

Dr Weinsaft was the recipient of a Doris Duke Clinical Scientist Development Award from the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (New York, NY)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weinsaft, J.W., Gade, C.L., Wong, F.J. et al. Diagnostic impact of SPECT image display on assessment of obstructive coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 14, 659–668 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.06.115

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.06.115

Key words

Search

Navigation