Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Regarding the virtues and limitations of combining myocardial perfusion spect data acquired by diverse methods

  • Editorial
  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Kiat H, Berman DS, Maddahi J, et al. Late reversibility of tomographic myocardial thallium-201 defects: an accurate marker of myocardial viability. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;12:1456–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Iskander S, Iskandrian A. Risk assessment using single-photon emission computed tomographic technetium-99m sestamibi imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:57–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berman DS, Kiat H, Friedman JD, et al. Separate acquisition rest thallium-201/stress technetium-99m sestamibi dual-isotope myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography: a clinical validation study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:1455–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. He ZX, Iskandrian AS, Gupta NC, et al. Assessing coronary artery disease with dipyridamole technetium-99m-tetrofosmin SPECT: a multicenter trial. J Nucl Med 1997;38:44–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aksut SV, Pancholy S, Cassel D, et al. Results of adenosine single photon emission computed tomography thallium-201 imaging in hemodynamic nonresponders. Am Heart J 1995;30:67–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Masood Y, Liu YH, DePuey G, et al. Clinical validation of SPECT attenuation correction using x-ray computed tomography-derived attenuation maps: multicenter clinical trial with angiographic correlation. J Nucl Cardiol 2005;12:676–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maddahi J, Van Train KF, Prigent F, et al. Quantitative single photon emission computerized thallium-201 tomography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease: optimization and prospective validation of a new technique. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;14:1689–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. DePuey EG, Rozanski A. Using gated technetium-99m sestamibi SPECT to characterize fixed myocardial defects as infarct or artifact. J Nucl Med 1995;36:952–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hayes SW, De Lorenzo A, Hachamovitch R, et al. Prognostic implications of combined prone and supine acquisitions in patients with equivocal or abnormal supine myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med 2003;44:1633–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Slomka PJ, Nishina H, Abidov A, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Berman DS, et al. Combined quantitative supine-prone myocardial perfusion SPECT improves detection of coronary artery disease and normalcy rates in women. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:44–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Druz RS, Nichols KJ, Ngai K, et al. Effect of prone position and attenuation correction on test characteristics of myocardial perfusion imaging in female patients with breast shadow artifacts [abstract]. J Nucl Cardiol 2004;11:S14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Slomka PJ, Nishina H, Berman DS, et al. Automated quantification of myocardial perfusion SPECT using simplified normal limits. J Nucl Cardiol 2005;12:66–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nishina H, Slomka PJ, Abidov A, et al. Combined supine and prone quantitative myocardial perfusion SPECT: method development and clinical validation in patients with no known coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med 2006;47:51–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nichols, K.J. Regarding the virtues and limitations of combining myocardial perfusion spect data acquired by diverse methods. J Nucl Cardiol 14, 4–5 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.11.008

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.11.008

Navigation