Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do risk factors influence the diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) is a relatively new noninvasive imaging modality in the evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Whether diagnostic accuracy is influenced by gender or risk factors for CAD is currently unknown and was evaluated in this study.

Methods and Results

In 197 patients (171 men and 26 women; mean age, 60 ± 11 years) 16-slice MSCT was performed and compared with invasive coronary angiography at 2 different centers (Leiden and Rotterdam, The Netherlands). Diagnostic accuracy for the detection of 50% luminal narrowing or greater was calculated for all patients combined, as well as for patients with known versus suspected CAD. In addition, diagnostic accuracy was determined in men versus women and in different subsets of patients based on the presence of risk factors for CAD including hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and obesity. Only segments with a diameter of 2.0 mm or greater were evaluated, whereas smaller segments and stents were excluded from the analysis. Overall, a sensitivity and specificity of 99% and 86%, respectively, on a patient level were demonstrated, with corresponding positive and negative predictive values of 95% and 96%, respectively. Similar values were observed in the different subsets of patients, with no statistical differences.

Conclusion

These findings confirm the high diagnostic accuracy of MSCT, regardless of gender or risk factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Achenbach S, Ulzheimer S, Baum U, Kachelriess M, Ropers D, Giesler T, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT. Circulation 2000;102:2823–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Rensing BJ, van Ooijen P, Munne A, van Geuns RJ, et al. Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet 2001;357:599–603.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Shaw LJ, de Roos A, Lamb HJ, van der Wall EE, et al. Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography. Am Heart J 2006;151:404–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2004; 27 (Suppl 1): S5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grundy SM, Balady GJ, Criqui MH, Fletcher G, Greenland P, Hiratzka LF, et al. Primary prevention of coronary heart disease: guidance from Framingham: a statement for healthcare professionals from the AHA Task Force on Risk Reduction. American Heart Association. Circulation 1998;97:1876–87.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grundy SM, Brewer HB Jr, Cleeman JI, Smith SC Jr, Lenfant C. Definition of metabolic syndrome: report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Heart Association conference on scientific issues related to definition. Circulation 2004;109:433–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Levey AS, Beto JA, Coronado BE, Eknoyan G, Foley RN, Kasiske BL, et al. Controlling the epidemic of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease: what do we know? What do we need to learn? Where do we go from here? National Kidney Foundation Task Force on Cardiovascular Disease. Am J Kidney Dis 1998; 32:853–906.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K, Saia F, Lemos PA, McFadden EP, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:2265–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Salm LP, Jukema JW, Lamb HJ, van der Wall EE, et al. Noninvasive coronary imaging and assessment of left ventricular function using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2005;95:571–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Cury RC, Ferencik M, Jang IK, Diaz LJ, et al. Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease: patient- versus segment-based analysis. Circulation 2004;110:2638–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mieres JH, Shaw LJ, Arai A, Budoff MJ, Flamm SD, Hundley WG, et al. Role of noninvasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected coronary artery disease: consensus statement from the Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association. Circulation 2005; 111:682–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shaw LJ, Gibbons RJ, McCallister B. Gender differences in extent and severity of coronary disease in the ACC-National Cardiovascular Data Registry [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:321A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW, Lamb HJ, Vliegen HW, Salm LP, et al. Noninvasive angiography and assessment of left ventricular function using multislice computed tomography in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27:2905–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW, Lamb HJ, Vliegen HW, van der Wall EE, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of the coronary arteries with multislice computed tomography in hypertensive patients. Hypertension 2005;45:227–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Melidonis A, Dimopoulos V, Lempidakis E, Hatzissavas J, Kouvaras G, Stefanidis A, et al. Angiographic study of coronary artery disease in diabetic patients in comparison with nondiabetic patients. Angiology 1999;50:997–1006.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hacker M, Jakobs T, Matthiesen F, Vollmar C, Nikolaou K, Becker C, et al. Comparison of spiral multidetector CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging in the noninvasive detection of functionally relevant coronary artery lesions: first clinical experiences. J Nucl Med 2005;46:1294–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bax JJ, Schuijf JD. Which role for multislice computed tomography in clinical cardiology? Am Heart J 2005;149:960–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeroen J. Bax.

Additional information

This work was financially supported by The Netherlands Heart Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands (grants 2002B105 and 2001D032).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schuijf, J.D., Bax, J.J., Jukema, J.W. et al. Do risk factors influence the diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography?. J Nucl Cardiol 13, 635–641 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.05.019

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.05.019

Key Words

Navigation