References
Bateman TM, Heller GV, McGhie AL, Friedman JD, Case JA, Bryngelson JR, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13:24–33.
Go RT, Marwick TH, MacIntyre WJ, Saha GB, Neumann DR, Underwood DA, et al. A prospective comparison of rubidium-82 PET and thallium-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging utilizing a single dipyridamole stress in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med 1990;31:1899–905.
Stewart RE, Schwaiger M, Molina E, Popma J, Gacioch GM, Kalus M, et al. Comparison of rubidium-82 positron emission tomography and thallium-201 SPECT imaging for detection of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1991;67:1303–10.
Di Carli MF, Hachamovitch R. Should PET replace SPECT for evaluating CAD? The end of the beginning. J Nucl Cardiol 2006; 13:2–7.
Mullani NA, Goldstein RA, Gould KL, Marani SK, Fisher DJ, O’Brien HA Jr, et al. Myocardial perfusion with rubidium-82. I. Measurement of extraction fraction and flow with external detectors. J Nucl Med 1983;24:898–906.
Goldstein RA, Mullani NA, Marani SK, Fisher DJ, Gould KL, O’Brien HA Jr. Myocardial perfusion with rubidium-82. II. Effects of metabolic and pharmacologic interventions. J Nucl Med 1983; 24:907–15.
Additional information
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02974603.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weinmann, P. To the editor. J Nucl Cardiol 13, 591 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.05.015
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.05.015