Skip to main content

Does scatter correction of cardiac spect improve image quality in the presence of high extracardiac activity?

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology volume 11, pages 424–432 (2004)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Extracardiac activity confounds conventional cardiac single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) image reconstruction. It has been proposed that applying scatter correction (SC) may improve image quality. This study was done to test whether SC improves several quantitative measures of cardiac imaging in the presence of high extracardiac activity.

Methods and Results

An anatomic anthropomorphic phantom with a cardiac insert filled with technetium 99m was used. We obtained acquisitions using a dual-headed SPECT camera at 13 different levels of liver-to-heart activity. Each acquisition was reconstructed by use of each of 6 different methods: filtered backprojection with or without SC, maximum likelihood with or without SC, and maximum likelihood with attenuation correction (AC) and with or without SC. Three different parameters were used to assess the effect of the processing methods on image quality: image variability, contrast, and signal-to-noise ratio. Only image contrast improved significantly with SC. By adding SC to filtered backprojection, image contrast improved by 13% (P< .01). Maximum likelihood reconstruction with AC resulted in further improvement in contrast (increase of 17%), variability (decrease of 5%), and signal-to-noise ratio (increase of 6%) over filtered backprojection (all P < .01).

Conclusion

Image quality improved significantly when SC was applied, especially when combined with maximum likelihood reconstruction with AC. This improvement was present despite increased extracardiac activity in close proximity to the heart.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. King MA, Xia W, deVries DJ, et al. A Monte Carlo investigation of artifacts caused by liver uptake in single-photon emission computed tomography perfusion imaging with technetium 99mlabeled agents. J Nucl Cardiol 1996;3:18–29.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Germano G, Chua T, Kiat H, Areeda JS, Berman DS. A quantitative phantom analysis of artifacts due to hepatic activity in technetium-99m myocardial perfusion SPECT studies. J Nucl Med 1994;35:356–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Heller EN, DeMan P, Liu YH, et al. Extracardiac activity complicates quantitative cardiac SPECT imaging using a simultaneous transmission-emission approach. J Nucl Med 1997;38:1882–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hendel RC, Berman DS, Cullom SJ, et al. Multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of correction for photon attenuation and scatter in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Circulation 1999; 99:2742–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. El Fakhri G, Buvat I, Benali H, Todd-Pokropek A, Di Paola R.Relative impact of scatter, collimator response, attenuation, and finite spatial resolution corrections in cardiac SPECT. J Nucl Med 2000;41:1400–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sorenson JA, Phelps ME. Physics in nuclear medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1987. p. 362–423.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ljungberg M, King MA, Hademenos GJ, Strand SE. Comparison of four scatter correction methods using Monte Carlo simulated source distributions. J Nucl Med 1994;35:143–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Galt JR, Cullom SJ, Garcia EV. SPECT quantification: a simplified method of attenuation and scatter correction for cardiac imaging. J Nucl Med 1992;33:2232–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Meikle SR, Hutton BF, Bailey DL. A transmission-dependent method for scatter correction in SPECT. J Nucl Med 1994;35:360–77.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. King MA, Tsui BM, Pan TS. Attenuation compensation for cardiac single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging: part 1. Impact of attenuation and methods of estimating attenuation maps. J Nucl Cardiol 1995;2:513–24.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Luo D-S, King MA, Morgan HT, et al. Investigations into possible causes of hot inferior wall artifacts in attenuation corrected cardiac perfusion images. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1997;44:1146–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pretorius PH, Narayanan MV, Dahlberg ST, Leppo JA, King MA.The influence of attenuation and scatter compensation on the apparent distribution of Tc-99m sestamibi in cardiac slices. J Nucl Cardiol 2001;8:356–64.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nuyts J, Dupont P, Van den Maegdenbergh V, et al. A study of the liver-heart artifact in emission tomography. J Nucl Med 1995;36:133–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Connor MK, Caiati C, Christian TF, Gibbons RJ. Effects of scatter correction on the measurement of infarct size from SPECT cardiac phantom studies. J Nucl Med 1995;36:2080–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jaszczak RJ, Whitehead FR, Lim CB, Coleman RE. Lesion detection with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) compared with conventional imaging. J Nucl Med 1982;23:97–102.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jaszczak RJ, Greer KL, Floyd CE, Harris CC, Coleman RE.Improved SPECT quantification using compensation for scattered photons. J Nucl Med 1984;25:893–900.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. King MA, Hademenos GJ, Glick SJ. A dual-photopeak window method for scatter correction. J Nucl Med 1992;33:605–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Groch MW, Erwin WD. SPECT in the year 2000: basic principles. J Nucl Med Technol 2000;28:233–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ficaro EP, Fessler JA, Shreve PD, et al. Simultaneous transmission/ emission myocardial perfusion tomography. Diagnostic accuracy of attenuation-corrected 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 1996;93:463–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Links JM, Becker LC, Rigo P, et al. Combined corrections for attenuation, depth-dependant blur, and motion in cardiac SPECT: a multicenter trial. J Nucl Cardiol 2000;7:414–25.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center, 1650 Grand Concourse,12th Floor, 10457, Bronx, NY

    Mohammed E. Khalil, Edward J. Brown & Eliot N. Heller

  2. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY

    Mohammed E. Khalil

  3. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY

    Mohammed E. Khalil, Edward J. Brown & Eliot N. Heller

Authors
  1. Mohammed E. Khalil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Edward J. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eliot N. Heller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eliot N. Heller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khalil, M.E., Brown, E.J. & Heller, E.N. Does scatter correction of cardiac spect improve image quality in the presence of high extracardiac activity?. J Nucl Cardiol 11, 424–432 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2004.03.031

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2004.03.031

Key Words

  • Single photon emission computed tomography
  • scatter correction
  • attenuation correction
  • filtered backprojection
  • maximum likelihood expectation maximization