Abstract
In solitary carnivores, scent marking is an important form of communication among individuals. We examined the extent of potential communication among ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) at communal latrine sites at the population level. We used a combination of camera-trapping and noninvasive genetics to monitor 18 ocelot latrines in an isolated population on Barro Colorado Island in the Republic of Panama. We found that 72% of monitored ocelot latrines were used by multiple individuals of both sexes, with a mean of 3.0 individuals (range 1–9) per year using each latrine. One highly used latrine was visited by 17 different individuals including 11 males and 6 females over the course of 6 years. Based on visits to the same latrine within 10 days of one another, potential for scent communication among individuals was high. Males had the potential to communicate with a mean of 5.9 other individuals (range 2–14), and females had the potential to communicate with a mean of 4.5 other individuals (range 3–12) at latrines. We conclude that communal latrines are important centers of scent communication for Leopardus pardalis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailey, T.N., 1974. Social-organization in a bobcat population. J. Wildl. Manage. 38, 435–446.
Broquet, T., Menard, N., Petit, E., 2007. Noninvasive population genetics: a review of sample source, diet, fragment length and microsatellite motif effects on amplification success and genotyping error rates. Conserv. Genet. 8, 249–260.
Chaves, P.B., Graeff, V.G., Lion, M.B., Oliveira, L.R., Eizirik, E., 2012. DNA barcoding meets molecular scatology: short mtDNA sequences for standardized species assignment of carnivore noninvasive samples. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 12, 18–35.
Clapham, M., Nevin, O.T., Ramsey, A.D., Rosell, F., 2012. A hypothetico-deductive approach to assessing the social function of chemical signalling in a nonterritorial solitary carnivore. PLoS ONE 7 (4), e35404.
Darden, S.K., Steffensen, L.K., Dabelsteen, T., 2008. Information transfer among widely spaced individuals: latrines as a basis for communication networks in the swift fox? Anim. Behav. 75, 425–432.
Di Bitetti, M.S., Paviolo, A., De Angelo, CD., Di Blanco, Y.E., 2008. Local and continental correlates of the abundance of a neotropical cat, the ocelot (Leopardus pardalis). J. Trop. Ecol., 24.
Gorman, M.L., Trowbridge, B.J., 1989. The Role of Odor in the Social Lives of Carnivores. Chapman & Hall/Cornell University Press, London/New York.
Janecka, J.E., Tewes, M.E., Laack, L.L., Caso, A., Grassman, L.I., Haines, A.M., Shindle, D.B., Davis, B.W., Murphy, W.J., Honeycutt, R.L., 2011. Reduced genetic diversity and isolation of remnant ocelot populations occupying a severely fragmented landscape in southern Texas. Anim. Conserv. 14, 608–619.
Johnson, W.E., Franklin, W.L., 1991. Feeding and spatial ecology of Felis geoffroyi in southern Patagonia. J. Mammal. 72, 815–820.
Macdonald, D.W., 1980. Patterns of scent marking with urine and faeces amongst carnivore communities. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 45, 107–139.
Manfredi, C, Soler, L., Lucherini, M., Casanave, E.B., 2006. Home range and habitat use by Geoffroy’s cat (Oncifelis geoffroyi) in a wet grassland in Argentina. J. Zool. 268, 381–387.
Marnewick, K.A., Bothma, J.D., Verdoorn, G.H., 2006. Using camera-trapping to investigate the use of a tree as a scent-marking post by cheetahs in the Thabazimbi district. South Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 36, 139–145.
Mellen,J.D., 1993. A comparative analysis of scent-marking, social and reproductive behavior in 20 species of small cats (Felis). Am. Zool. 33, 151–166.
Menotti-Raymond, M., David, V.A., Lyons, LA, Schaffer, A.A., Tomlin, J.F., Hutton, M.K., O’Brien, S.J., 1999. A genetic linkage map of microsatellites in the domestic cat (Felis catus). Genomics 57, 9–23.
Molteno, A.J., Sliwa, A., Richardson, P.R.K., 1998. The role of scent marking in a freeranging, female black-footed cat (Felis nigripes). J. Zool. 245, 35–41.
Moreno, R., Giacalone, J., 2014. Use of video camera-traps to study ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) behavior at latrines. Mesoamericana 18, 55–60.
Moreno, R., Kays, R., Giacalone-Willis, J., Aliaga-Rossel, E., Mares, R., Bustamante, A., 2012. Home range and circadian activity of ocelots (leopardus pardalis) in Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Mesoamericana 16, 30–39.
Muller, C.A., Manser, M.B., 2008. Scent-marking and intrasexual competition in a cooperative carnivore with low reproductive skew. Ethology 114, 174–185.
Murphy, W.J., Sun, S., Chen, Z.Q., Pecon-Slattery, J., O’Brien, S.J., 1999. Extensive conservation of sex chromosome organization between cat and human revealed by parallel radiation hybrid mapping. Genome Res. 9, 1223–1230.
Napolitano, C, Bennett, M., Johnson, W.E., O’Brien, S.J., Marquet, P.A., Barria, I., Poulin, E., Iriarte, A., 2008. Ecological and biogeographical inferences on two sympatric and enigmatic Andean cat species using genetic identification of faecal samples. Mol. Ecol. 17, 678–690.
Nowell, K., Jackson, P., 1996. Wild Cats: Status Survey and Action Plan. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
Palagi, E., Dapporto, L., 2006. Beyond odor discrimination: demonstrating individual recognition by scent in Lemur catta. Chem. Senses 31, 437–443.
Peakall, R., Smouse, P.E., 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6, 288–295.
Piñeiro, A., Barja, I., 2015. Evaluating the function of wildcat faecal marks in relation to the defence of favourable hunting areas. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 27, 161–172.
Richardson, P.R.K., 1993. The function of scent marking in territories-a resurrection of the intimidation hypothesis. Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Afr. 48, 195–206.
Rishi, V., 2012. The role of scent marking in the breeding behavior of tiger and other big cats. Indian For. 138, 910–914.
Robinson, I.H., Delibes, M., 1988. The distribution of feces by the Spanish lynx(Felis pardina). J. Zool. 216, 577–582.
Rodgers, T., Janecka, J., 2013. Applications and techniques for non-invasive faecal genetics research in felid conservation. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 59, 1–16.
Rodgers, T.W., Giacalone, J., Heske, E.J., Janečka, J.E., Phillips, C.A., Jansen, P.A., Schooley, R.L., 2015. Socio-spatial organization and kin structure in ocelots from integration of camera trapping and noninvasive genetics. J. Mammal. 96, 120–128.
Rodgers, T.W., Giacalone, J., Heske, E.J., Janečka, J.E., Phillips, C.A., Schooley, R.L., 2014. Comparison of noninvasive genetics and camera trapping for estimating population density of ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 7, 690–705.
Soler, L., Lucherini, M., Manfredi, C., Ciuccio, M., Casanave, E.B., 2009. Characteristics of defecation sites of the geoffroy’s cat Leopardus geoffroyi. Mastozoologia Neotrop. 16, 485–489.
Taberlet, P., Fumagalli, L., 1996. Owl pellets as a source of DNA for genetic studies of small mammals. Mol. Ecol. 5, 301–305.
Taberlet, P., Waits, L.P., Luikart, G., 1999. Noninvasive genetic sampling: look before you leap. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 323–327.
Thom, M.D., Hurst, J.L., 2004. Individual recognition by scent. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 41, 765–787.
Trolle, M., Kery, M., 2003. Estimation of ocelot density in the pantanal using capturerecapture analysis of camera-trapping data. J. Mammal. 84, 607–614.
Vogt, K., Zimmermann, F., Kolliker, M., Breitenmoser, U., 2014. Scent-marking behaviour and social dynamics in a wild population of Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx. Behav. Processes 106, 98–106.
Waits, L.P., Luikart, G., Taberlet, P., 2001. Estimating the probability of identity among genotypes in natural populations: cautions and guidelines. Mol. Ecol. 10, 249–256.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rodgers, T.W., Giacalone, J., Heske, E.J. et al. Communal latrines act as potentially important communication centers in ocelots Leopardus pardalis. Mamm Biol 80, 380–384 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2015.05.004
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2015.05.004