Abstract
The European roe deer population in Portugal is on the southwestern edge of its distribution. Understanding limiting factors that act on these populations enlightens both local aspects concerning their conservation and wider scale aspects of the species bioclimatic envelope, which is crucial for being better able to predict the impacts of environmental change. Accordingly, a survey was conducted to explore roe deer distribution in a 75,000 ha area located in Trás-os-Montes region, a Mediterranean landscape in the northeast of Portugal. Pellet-group counts were used to examine how roe deer distribution was related to habitat structure and composition, landscape structure, and human disturbance. The analysis considered two spatial scales: habitat patch and the wider landscape. At the patch scale, roe deer distribution was positively associated with high density of shrubs and with increasing distance from roads. At the landscape scale, roe deer distribution was negatively associated with spatial heterogeneity, namely mean shape index. Our findings suggest that landscape structure, vegetation composition and distance to roads are all important factors influencing roe deer distribution, highlighting the importance of multi-scale approaches.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acevedo, P., Delibes-Mateos, M., Escudero, M.A., Vicente, J., Marco, J., Gortazar, C., 2005. Environmental constraints in the colonization sequence of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus Linnaeus, 1758) across the Iberian Mountains, Spain. J. Biogeogr. 32, 1671–1680.
Apollonio, M., Andersen, R., Putman, R., 2010. European Ungulates and Their Management in the 21st Century. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Aragón, S., Braza, F., San José, C., 1995. Socioeconomic, physiognomic, and climatic factors determining the distribution pattern of roe deer Capreolus capreolus in Spain. Acta Theriol. 40, 37–43.
Boitani, L., 2000. Action Plan for the Conservation of Wolves (Canis lupus) in Europev, vol. 113. Nature and Environment, Council of Europe Publishing, pp. 1–86.
Borkowski, J., 2004. Distribution and habitat use by red and roe deer following a large forest fire in South-western Poland. Forest Ecol. Manage. 201, 287–293.
Borkowski, J., Ukalska, J., 2008. Winter habitat use by red and roe deer in pine-dominated forest. Forest Ecol. Manage. 255, 468–475.
Brewka, A., Kossak, S., 1994. The influence of atmospheric conditions on the mobility of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) in winter. Ekol. Pol. 40, 225–237.
Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., 1998. Model Selection and Multi-model Inference: A Practical Information-theoretic Approach. Springer, New York.
Carvalho, P., Nogueira, A.J.A., Soares, A.M.V.M., Fonseca, C., 2008. Ranging behaviour of translocated roe deer in a Mediterranean habitat: seasonal and altitudinal influences on home range size and patterns of range use. Mammalia 72, 89–94.
Collins, W.B., Urness, P.J., 1981. Habitat preferences of mule deer as rated by pellet-group distributions. J. Wildl. Manage. 45, 969–972.
Copeland, H.E., Tessman, S.A., Girvetz, E.H., Roberts, L., Enquist, C., Orabona, A., Patla, S., Kiesecker, J., 2010. Ageospatial assessment on the distribution, condition, and vulnerability of Wyoming’s wetlands. Ecol. Indic. 10, 869–879.
Creel, S., Winnie, J., Maxwell, B., Hamlin, K., Creel, M., 2005. Elk alter habitat selection as an antipredator response to wolves. Ecology 86, 3387–3397.
Cushman, A.S., McGarigal, K., 2004. Patterns in the species-environment relationship depend on both scale and choice of response variables. Oikos 105, 117–124.
Demment, M.W., Soest, P.J.V., 1985. A nutritional explanation for body-size patterns of ruminant and nonruminant herbivores. Am. Nat. 125, 641–672.
Dunning, J.B., Danielson, B.J., Pulliam, H.R., 1992. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65, 169–175.
Edge, W.D., Marcum, C.L., 1989. Determining elk distribution with pellet-group and telemetry techniques. J. Wildl. Manage. 53, 621–624.
Faria, A.M.S., 1999. Dieta de corço (Capreolus capreolus L.) no Centro e Nordeste de Portugal. M.Sc. thesis, Department of Zoology, The University of Coimbra, Coimbra.
Fortin, D., Beyer, H.L., Boyce, M.S., Smith, D.W., Duchesne, T., Mao, J.S., 2005. Wolves influence elk movement: behavior shapes a trophic cascade in Yellowstone National Park. Ecology 86, 1320–1330.
Gill, R.M.A., Johnson, A.L., Francis, A., Hiscocks, K., Peace, J.A., 1996. Changes in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) population density in response to forest habitat succession. Forest Ecol. Manage. 88, 31–41.
Gonçalves, D.A., 1980. O meio Natural. O Parque Natural de Montesinho. Serviço Nacional de Parques e Reservas e Património Paisagístico.
Graham, M.H., 2003. Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 84, 2809–2815.
Guillet, C., Bergstrom, R., Cederlund, G., Bergstrom, J., Ballon, P., 1995. Comparison of telemetry and pellet-group counts for determining habitat selectivity by roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in winter. Gibier Faune Sauvage. 12, 253–269.
Guisan, A., Thuiller, W., 2005. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol. Lett. 8, 993–1009.
Hebblewhite, M., Merrill, E.H., McDonald, T.L., 2005. Spatial decomposition of predation risk using resource selection functions: an example in a wolf-elk predator-prey system. Oikos 111, 101–111.
Heithaus, M.R., Wirsing, A.J., Burkholder, D., Thomson, J., Dill, L.M., 2009. Towards a predictive framework for predator risk effects: the interaction of landscape features and prey escape tactics. J. Appl. Ecol. 78, 556–562.
Hemami, M.R., Watkinson, A.R., Dolman, P.M., 2004. Habitat selection by sympatric muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in a lowland commercial pine forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 194, 49–60.
Hewison, A.J., Vincent, J.P., Joachim, J., Angibault, J.M., Cargnelutti, B., Cibien, C., 2001. The effects of woodland fragmentation and human activity on roe deer distribution in agricultural landscapes. Can. J. Zool. 79, 679–689.
Hoffmann, A.A., Blows, M.W., 1994. Species borders: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 223–227.
Holt, R.D., Keitt, T.H., 2005. Species’ borders: a unifying theme in ecology. Oikos 108, 3–6.
Jędrzejewski, W., Jędrzejewska, B., Okarma, H., Ruprecht, A.L., 1992. Wolf predation and snow coveras mortality factors in the ungulate community of the Bialowieża National Parkm, Poland. Oecologia 90, 27–36.
Jędrzejewski, W., Schmidt, K., Theuerkauf, J., Jędrzejewski, B., Selva, N., Zub, K., Szymura, L., 2002. Kill rates and predation by wolves on ungulate populations in Białowieża Primeval forest (Poland). Ecology 83, 1341–1356.
Jepsen, J.U., Topping, C.J., 2004. Modelling roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in a gradient of forest fragmentation: behavioural plasticity and choice of cover. Can. J. Zool. 82, 1528–1541.
Jiang, G., Ma, J., Zhang, M.H., 2006. Spatial distribution of ungulate responses to habitat factors in Wandashan forest region, northeastern China. J. Wildl. Manage. 70, 1470–1476.
Jiang, G., Ma, J., Zhang, M., Stott, P., 2009. Multiple spatial-scale resource selection function models in relation to human disturbance for moose in northeastern China. Ecol. Res. 24, 423–440.
Kie, J.G., Bowyer, R.T., Nicholson, M.C., Boroski, B.B., Loft, E.R., 2002. Landscape heterogeneity at differing scales: effects on spatial distribution of mule deer. Ecology 83, 530–544.
Kjostvedt, J., Mysterud, A., Ostbye, E., 1998. Roe deer Capreolus capreolus use of agricultural crops during winter in the Lier valley, Norway. Wildl. Biol. 4, 23–31.
Kremsater, L.L., Bunnell, F.L., 1992. Testing responses to forest edges: the example of black-tailed deer. Can. J. Zool. 70, 2426–2435.
Kunkel, E.K., Pletscher, D.H., 2000. Habitat factors affecting vulnerability of moose to predation by wolves in southeastern British Columbia. Can. J. Zool. 78, 150–157.
Lamberti, P., Mauri, L., Merli, E., Dusi, S., Apollonio, M., 2006. Use of space and habitat selection by roe deer Capreolus capreolus in a Mediterranean coastal area: how does woods landscape affect home range? J. Ethol. 24, 181–188.
Lande, R., 1993. Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. Am. Nat. 142, 911–927.
Lemmon, P.E., 1956. A spherical densiometer for estimating forest overstory density. Forest Sci. 2, 314–320.
Loft, E.R., Kie, J.G., 1988. Comparison of pellet-group and radio triangulation methods for assessing deer habitat use. J. Wildl. Manage. 52, 524–527.
Mander, Ü., Mikk, M., Külvik, M., 1999. Ecological and low intensity agriculture as contributors to landscape and biological diversity. Landscape Urban Plann. 46, 169–177.
Marques, F.F.C., Buckland, S.T., Goffin, D., Dixon, C.E., Borchers, D.L., Mayle, B.A., Peace, A.J., 2001. Estimating deer abundance from line transect surveys of dung: sika deer in southern Scotland. J. Appl. Ecol. 38, 349–363.
Massé, A., Côté, S.D., 2009. Habitat selection of a large herbivore at high density and without predation: trade-off between forage and cover? J. Mammal. 90, 961–970.
Mayle, B.A., Peace, A.J., Gill, R.M.A., 1999. How many deer? A field guide to estimating deer population size, Forestry Commission. Field book, 18.
Mayle, B.A., Putman, R.J., Wyllie, I., 2000. The use of trackway counts to establish an index of deer presence. Mamm. Rev. 30, 233–237.
Melis, C., Jędrzejewski, B., Apollonio, M., Barto, K.A., Jędrzejewski, W., Linnell, J.D.C., Kojola, I., Kusak, J., Adamic, M., Ciuti, S., Delehan, I., Dykyy, I., Krapinec, K., Mattioli, L., Sagaydak, A., Samchuk, N., Schmidt, K., Shkvyrya, M., Sidorovich, V.E., Zawadzka, B., Zhyla, S., 2009. Predation has a greater impact in less productive environments: variation in roe deer, Capreolus capreolus, population density across Europe. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 18, 724–734.
Molinari-Jobin, A., Molinari, P., Breitenmoser-Wuersten, C., Breitenmoser, U., 2002. Significance of lynx Lynx lynx predation for roe deer Capreolus capreolus and chamois Rupicapra rupicapra mortality in the Swiss Jura Mountains. Wildl. Biol. 8, 109–115.
Moreira, L.M., Rosa, J.L., Lourenco, J., Barroso, I., Pimenta, V., 1997. Projecto Lobo. Relatório de Progressão 1996 (Cofinanciado pela U. E. — Programa LIFE). Parque Natural de Montesinho, Braganca.
Mysterud, A., 1996. Bed-site selection by adult roe deer Capreolus capreolus in southern Norway during summer. Wildl. Biol. 2, 101–106.
Mysterud, A., Østbye, E., 1999. Cover as a habitat element for temperate ungulates: effects on habitat selection and demography. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 27, 385–394.
Neff, D.J., 1968. The pellet-group count technique for big game trend, census, and distribution: a review. J. Wildl. Manage. 32, 597–614.
Nilsen, E.B., Gaillard, J.M., Andersen, R., Odden, J., Delorme, D., Laere, G.V., Linnell, J.D.C., 2009. A slow life in hell or a fast life in heaven: demographic analyses of contrasting roe deer populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 78, 585–594.
Odden, J., Linnell, J., Andersen, R., 2006. Diet of Eurasian lynx, Lynx lynx, in the boreal forest of southeastern Norway: the relative importance of livestock and hares at low roe deer density. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 52, 237–244.
Okarma, H., Jędrzejewski, W., Schmidt, It, Kowalczyk, R., Jędrzejewska, B., 1997. Predation of Eurasian lynx on roe deer and red deer in Białowieża Primeval Forest, Poland. Acta Theriol. 42, 203–224.
Panzacchi, M., Linnell, J.D.C., Serrao, G., Eie, S., Odden, M., Odden, J., Andersen, R., 2008. Evaluation of the importance of roe deer fawns in the spring-summer diet of red foxes in southeastern Norway. Ecol. Res. 23, 889–896.
Prevedello, J.A., Rodrigues, R.G., Monteiro-Filho, E.L.A., 2010. Habitat selection by two species of small mammals in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil: comparing results from live trapping and spool-and-line tracking. Mamm. Biol. 75, 106–114.
Putman, R.J., 1996. Ungulates in temperate forest ecosystems: perspectives and recommendations for future research. Forest Ecol. Manage. 88, 205–214.
Ratikainen, I.I., Panzacchi, M., Mysterud, A., Odden, J., Linnell, J., Andersen, R., 2007. Use of winter habitat by roe deer at a northern latitude where Eurasian lynx are present. J. Zool. (Lond.) 273, 192–199.
Rettie, W.J., Messier, F., 2000. Hierarchical habitat selection by woodland caribou: its relationship to limiting factors. Ecography 23, 466–478.
Rotenberry, J.T., Preston, K.L., Knick, S.T., 2006. GIS-based niche modelling for mapping species’ habitat. Ecology 87, 1458–1464.
Rowland, M.M., Wisdom, M.J., Johnson, B.K., Kie, J.G., 2000. Elk distribution and modeling in relation to roads. J. Wildl. Manage. 64, 672–684.
Saïd, S., Servanty, S., 2005. The influence of landscape structure on female roe deer home-range size. Landscape Ecol. 20, 1003–1012.
Tellería, J.L., Virgós, E., 1997. Distribution of an increasing roe deer population in a fragmented Mediterranean landscape. Ecography 20, 247–252.
Theuerkauf, J., Rouys, S., 2008. Habitat selection by ungulates in relation to predation risk by wolves and humans in the Białowieza Forest, Poland. Forest Ecol. Manage. 256, 1325–1332.
Virgós, E., Telléria, J.L., 1998. Roe deer habitat selection in Spain: constraints on the distribution of a species. Can. J. Zool. 76, 1294–1299.
Vos, J., 2000. Food habits and livestock depredation of two Iberian wolf packs (Canis lupus signatus) in the north of Portugal. J. Zool. (Lond.) 251, 457–462.
Wiens, J.A., Stenseth, N.C., Horne, B.V., Ims, R.A., 1993. Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecol. Oikos 66, 369–380.
Wolff, J.O., Van Horn, T., 2003. Vigilance and foraging patterns of American elk during the rut in habitats with and without predators. Can. J. Zool. 81, 266–271.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Torres, R.T., Santos, J., Linnell, J.D.C. et al. Factors affecting roe deer occurrence in a Mediterranean landscape, Northeastern Portugal. Mamm Biol 76, 491–497 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2010.10.013
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2010.10.013