Abstract
It is widely believed that spatial scale affects habitat selection, and should influence management options, especially for species with wide geographic distribution or large territories. Eurasian badger habitat selection has been well studied throughout most of its European distribution range, but never at multiple spatial scales. We used compositional analysis to assess habitat selection of Eurasian badgers in southern Portugal at four spatial scales (1, 4, 25, and 100 km2). We assessed habitat use from setts, latrines and footprints presence, and road kills. Oak woodlands with understorey were selected at all scales, being the most preferred habitat at 3 scales (1, 4, and 100 km2). Pastures were most selected at the scale of the 25 km2 cell, but their use was not significantly different from oak woodland with understorey. Shrubs and pastures were also secondly important at the majority of scales. Contrary to findings at northern latitudes, deciduous forests decreased in importance as cell size increased. In the highly humanized and fragmented landscape of southern Portugal, Eurasian badgers are selecting the matrix of oak woodlands interspersed with patches of pastures, shrubs and riparian vegetation. In these oak woodlands, scale does not have a marked effect. Management for badgers should provide, for at least, 30% of oak woodland cover at all scales. Our study illustrates the across-scale importance of maintaining the historically human altered, sustainable and unique landscape and land use system — the montado.
Zusammenfassung
Es wird weithin angenommen, daß die Biotopgrösse die Wahl des Lebensraums beeinträchtigt, und daß dies die Landschaftsplanung beeinflussen sollte, besonders bei Tierarten mit ausgedehnten Lebensräumen und weiter geographischer Verbreitung.
Die Auswahl des Lebensraumes durch den eurasischen Dachs ist im Grossteil des europäischen Verbreitungsraumes weitgehend bekannt, jedoch wurden bei Untersuchungen niemals mehrfache Flächenmaße angewandt. Wir haben Kompositionsanalysen verwandt, um die Wahl des Lebensraumes von eurasischen Dachsen in Südportugal mittels fünf Rastergrössen (1, 4, 25, and 100 km2) unter Verwendung von Anwesenheitsanzeichen (Dachsbau, Dachsabtritte, Spuren, Strassenkadaver) abzuschätzen. Bei keiner Rastergrösse wurde die Wahl des Lebensraumes zufällig getroffen. Bei allen verwendeten Rastergrössen wurden Eichenwälder mit Unterwuchs ausgewaehlt, der bevorzugteste Lebensraum bei 4 Rastergrössen (1 m2, 4, 25, and 100 km2). Bei einer Rastergröße von 25 km2 wurden Weiden bevorzugt. Ferner waren bei der Mehrzahl der Rastergrössen Sträucher und Weiden von zweithäufigster Bedeutung. Im Gegensatz zu Ergebnissen aus nördlichen Breiten verloren Laubwälder mit zunehmender Rastergröße in Portugal an Bedeutung. In der stark bevölkerten und fragmentierten Landschaft Südportugals bevorzugen eurasische Dachse die Matrix von Eichenwäldern mit dazwischenliegenden Weiden, Sträuchern und Ufervegetation. In diesen offenen Eichenwäldern hat die Wahl der Rastergrösse keinen merklichen Effekt.
Die Landschafts- und Naturschutzplanung sollte deshalb mindestens 30% Eichenwaldanteil im Landschaftbild sicherstellen, um den Dachsbestand langfristig zu sichern. Unsere Fallstudie zeigt die Bedeutung historischer Kulturlandschaften wie des Montados für den Artenreichtum, Naturschutz und für die Sicherstellung einer zukunftsfähigen und ausgewogenen Landnutzung.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aebischer, N.J., Marcström, V., Kenward, R.E., Karlbom, M., 1993a. Survival and habitat utilisation: a case for compositional analysis. In: Lebreton, J.-D., North, P.M. (Eds.), Marked Individuals in the Study of Bird Population. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp. 343–353.
Aebischer, N.J., Robertson, P.A., Kenward, R.E., 1993b. Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74, 1313–1325.
Aued, M.B., Chéhebar, C., Porro, G., Macdonald, D.W., Cassini, M.H., 2003. Environmental correlates of the distribution of southern river otters Lontra provocax at different ecological scales. Oryx 37, 413–421.
Betts, M.G., Diamond, A.W., Forbes, G.J., Villard, M.-A., Gunn, J.S., 2006. The importance of spatial autocorrelation, extent and resolution in predicting forest bird occurrence. Ecol. Model. 191, 197–224.
Blondel, J., Aronson, J., 1999. Biology and Wildlife of the Mediterranean Region. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Brøseth, H., Knutsen, B., Bevanger, K., 1997. Spatial organization and habitat utilization of badgers Meles meles: effects of food patch dispersion in the boreal forest of central Norway. Z. Säugetierkunde 62, 12–22.
Cheeseman, C.L., Jones, G.W., Gallagher, J., Mallinson, P.J., 1981. The population structure, density and prevalance of tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) in badgers (Meles meles) from four areas in south-west England. J. Appl. Ecol. 18, 795–804.
Cheng, R.C.H., Stephens, M.A., 1986. A goodness-of-fit test using Moran’s statistic with estimated parameters. Biometrika 76, 385–392.
da Silva, J., Woodroffe, R., Macdonald, D.W., 1993. Habitat, food availability and group territoriality in the European badger, Meles meles. Oecologia 95, 558–564.
Diáz, M., Campos, P., Pulido, J., 1997. The Spanish dehesas: a diversity in land-use and wildlife. In: Pain, D.J., Pierkowski, M.W. (Eds.), Farming and Birds in Europe: The Common Agriculture Policy and its Implications for Bird Conservation. Academic Press, London, pp. 178–209.
Englund, G., 1997. Importance of spatial scale and prey movements in predator caging experiments. Ecology 78, 2316–2325.
Epperson, B.K., Li, T., 1996. Measurement of genetic structure within populations using Moran’s I spatial autocorrelation statistics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93, 10528–10532.
Feore, S., Montgomery, W.I., 1999. Habitat effects on the spatial ecology of the European badger (Meles meles). J. Zool. Lond. 247, 537–549.
Fortin, M.J., Drapeau, P., Legendre, P., 1989. Spatial autocorrelation and sampling design in plant ecology. Vegetatio 83, 209–222.
Gergel, S.E., Turner, M.G., 2002. Learning Landscape Ecology. A Practical Guide to Concepts and Techniques. Springer, New York.
Good, T.C., Hindenlang, K., Imfeld, S., Nievergelt, B., 2001. A habitat analysis of badger (Meles meles L.) setts in a semi-natural forest. Mamm. Biol. 66, 204–214.
Goszczynski, J., Jedrzejewska, B., Jedrzejewski, W., 2000. Diet composition of badgers (Meles meles) in a pristine forest and rural habitats of Poland compared to other European populations. J. Zool. Lond. 250, 495–505.
Grove, A.T., Rackham, O., 2003. The Nature of Mediterranean Europe. An Ecological History. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Hartley, S., Kunin, W.E., 2003. Scale dependency of rarity, extinction risk, and conservation priority. Conserv. Biol. 17, 1559–1579.
Hay, G.L., Marceau, D.J., Dubé, P., Bouchard, A., 2001. Multiscale framework for landscape analysis: object-specific analysis and upscaling. Landscape Ecol. 16, 471–490.
Jepsen, J.U., Madsen, A.B., Karlsson, M., Groth, D., 2005. Predicting distribution and density of European badger (Meles meles) setts in Denmark. Biodivers. Conserv. 14, 3235–3253.
Kowalczyk, R., Zalewski, A., Jedrzejewska, B., Jedrzejewski, W., 2003. Spatial organization and demography of badgers (Meles meles) in Bialowieza Primeval Forest, Poland, and the influence of earthworms on badger densities in Europe. Can. J. Zool. 81, 74–87.
Kruuk, H., Parish, T., 1981. Feeding specialisation of the European badger Meles meles in Scotland. J. Anim. Ecol. 22, 705–715.
Kruuk, H., Parish, T., Brown, C.A.J., Carrera, J., 1979. The use of pasture by the European badger (Meles meles). J. Appl. Ecol. 16, 453–459.
Leban, F.A., Wisdom, M.J., Garton, E.O., Johnson, B.K., Kie, J.G., 2001. Effect of sample size on the performance of resource selection analyzes. In: Millspaugh, J.J., Marzluff, J.M. (Eds.), Radiotracking and Animal Populations. Academic Press, New York, pp. 291–307.
Levin, S.A., 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73, 1943–1967.
Makhzoumi, J.M., 1997. The changing role of rural landscapes: olive and carob multi-use tree plantations in the semiarid Mediterranean. Landscape Urban Plan. 37, 115–122.
Mitchell-Jones, A.J., Amori, G., Bogdanowicz, W., Krystufek, B., Reijnders, P.J.H., Spitzenberger, F., Stubbe, M., Thissen, J.B.M., Vohralik, V., Zima, J., 1999. The Atlas of European Mammals. T & AD Poyser Ltd., London.
Moran, P.A.P., 1950. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37, 17–23.
Moreira, F., Rego, F.R., Ferreira, P.G., 2001. Temporal (1958–1995) pattern of change in a cultural landscape of northwestern Portugal: implications for fire occurrence. Landscape Ecol. 16, 557–567.
Morrison, M.L., Marcot, B.G., Mannan, R.W., 1998. Wildlife Habitat Relationships. Concepts and Applications. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
Neal, E., Cheeseman, C., 1996. Badgers. T & A Poyser Ltd., London.
Pinto-Correia, T., 1993. Threatened landscape in Alentejo, Portugal: the Montado and other agro-silvo-pastoral systems. Landscape Urban Plan. 24, 43–48.
Pinto-Correia, T., 2000. Future development in Portuguese rural areas: how to manage agricultural support for landscape conservation? Landscape Urban Plan. 50, 95–106.
Pinto-Correia, T., Mascarenhas, J., 1999. Contribution to the extensification/intensification debate: new trends in the Portuguese montado. Landscape Urban Plan. 46, 125–131.
Plieninger, T., Pulido, F.J., Konold, W., 2003. Effects of land-use history on size structure of holm oak stands in Spanish dehesas: implications for the conservation and restoration. Environ. Conserv. 30, 61–70.
Powell, R.A., 1994. Effects of scale on habitat selection and foraging behavior of fishers in winter. J. Mammal. 75, 349–356.
Revilla, E., Palomares, F., 2002. Does local feeding specialization exist in Eurasian badgers? Can. J. Zool. 80, 83–93.
Revilla, E., Palomares, F., Delibes, M., 2000. Defining key habitats for low density populations of Eurasian badgers in Mediterranean environments. Biol. Conserv. 95, 269–277.
Rivas-Martínez, S., 1975. La vegetación de la clase Quercetea ilicis en España y Portugal. Anal. Inst. Bot. Cavanilles 25, 3–201.
Rosalino, L.M., 2004. Environmental determinants of badger (Meles meles) density and sociality in Mediterranean woodlands. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Lisbon, Lisbon.
Rosalino, L.M., Macdonald, D.W., Santos-Reis, M., 2004. Spatial structure and land cover use in a low density Mediterranean population of Eurasian badgers. Can. J. Zool. 83, 1493–1502.
Rosalino, L.M., Loureiro, F., Macdonald, D.W., Santos-Reis, M., 2005a. Dietary shifts of the badger Meles meles in Mediterranean woodlands: an opportunistic forager with seasonal specialisms. Mammal. Biol. 70, 12–23.
Rosalino, L.M., Macdonald, D.W., Santos-Reis, M., 2005b. Resource dispersion and badger population density in Mediterranean woodlands: is food, water or geology the limiting factor? Oikos 110, 441–452.
Sadlier, L.M.J., Webbon, C.C., Baker, P.J., Harris, S., 2004. Methods of monitoring red fox Vulpes vulpes and badgers Meles meles are field signs the answer? Mammal Rev. 34, 75–98.
Santos, M.J., 2003. Habitat selection by European badgers at multiple spatial scales: implications for the conservation of the montado. M.Sc. Thesis, Northern Arizona University, Arizona.
Sawada, M., 1999. Rookcase: an excel 97/2000 visual basic (VB) add-in for exploring global and local spatial autocorrelation. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 80, 231–234.
Schaefer, J.A., Bergman, C.M., Luttich, S.N., 2000. Site fidelity of female caribou at multiple spatial scales. Landscape Ecol. 15, 731–739.
Schonewald-Cox, C., Azari, R., Blume, S., 1991. Scale, variable density, and conservation planning for mammalian carnivores. Conserv. Biol. 5, 491–495.
Schooley, R.L., Wiens, J.A., 2001. Dispersion of kangaroo rat mounds at multiple scales in New Mexico, USA. Landscape Ecol. 16, 267–277.
Thompson, C.M., McGarigal, K., 2002. The influence of research scale on bald eagle habitat selection along the lower Hudson River, New York (USA). Landscape Ecol. 17, 569–586.
Turner, M.G., Dale, V.H., Gardner, R.H., 1989. Predicting across scales: theory development and testing. Landscape Ecol. 3, 245–252.
Turner, W.R., Tjørve, E., 2005. Scale-dependence in species area relationships. Ecography 28, 721–730.
Van Apeldoorn, R.C., Knaapen, J.P., Schippers, P., Verboon, J., Van Engen, H., Meeuwsen, H., 1998. Applying ecological knowledge in landscape planning: a simulation model as a tool to evaluate scenarios for the badger in the Netherlands. Landscape Urban Plan. 41, 57–69.
Virgós, E., 2001. Role of isolation and habitat quality in shaping species abundance: a test with badgers (Meles meles) in a gradient of forest fragmentation. J. Biogeogr. 28, 381–389.
Virgós, E., 2002. Are habitat generalists affected by forest fragmentation? A test with Eurasian badgers (Meles meles) in coarse-grained fragmented landscapes of central Spain. J. Zool. Lond. 258, 313–318.
Virgós, E., Revilla, E., Mangas, J.G., 2005. Factores que determinan la distributión y abundancia del tejón a escala de paisaje. In: Virgós, E., Mangas, J.G., Revilla, E., Roura, X.-D. (Eds.), Ecología y Conservatión del Tejón en Ecosistemas Mediterráneos. SECEM, Málaga, pp. 149–172.
Wright, A., Fielding, A.H., Wheater, C.P., 2000. Predicting the distribution of Eurasian Badger (Meles meles) setts over an urbanized landscape: a GIS approach. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. S. 66, 423–428.
Zar, J.H., 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosalino, L.M., Santos, M.J., Beier, P. et al. Eurasian badger habitat selection in Mediterranean environments: Does scale really matter?. Mamm Biol 73, 189–198 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2007.02.004
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2007.02.004