Skip to main content
Log in

Multivariate discrimination between East African cape hares (Lepus capensis) and savanna hares (L. victoriae) based on occipital bone shape

Multivariate Diskriminanzanalyse für Kap- und Savannen-Hasen (Lepus capensis und L. victoriae), anhand des Basioccipitalknochens

  • Original investigation
  • Published:
Mammalian Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In East Africa, cape hares (Lepus capensis) and savanna hares (L. victoriae) look much alike where their ranges overlap. Earlier studies suggested discrimination between the two species by several skull traits, but did not present morphometric statisitics. Our present discriminant analysis based on seven metric variables of the occipital bone related to skull length (condylobasal length) resulted in a high (95.1%) overall probability of correct separation of the two species. While all cape hares were classified correctly, correct classification was a bit lower in savanna hares (88.2%). A principal components analysis of the same variables confirmed the shape difference for the two species. Both region and sex-specific variation in the shape of the studied occipital bone complex was found in savanna hares but not in cape hares. The somewhat reduced level of correct identification of savanna hares might be due to a tendency for higher shape variation. Application of our discriminant analysis to other regions in East Africa is discussed.

Zusammenfassung

Ostafrikanische Kap- und Savannenhasen (Lepus capensis und L. victoriae) ähneln einander stark im Phänotyp, dort wo sie im selben Lebensraum vorkommen, und selbst bei genauer Analyse des Schädels ist eine korrekte Artbestimmung bisweilen nicht leicht. Ausgehend von der (nichtquantifizierten) Beobachtung, dass beide Arten sich in der Form des Basioccipitalknochens unterscheiden, haben wir eine Diskriminanzanalyse für beide Arten anhand von sieben Messstrecken durchgeführt. Durch geeignete Transformationen der Einzelmessstrecken wurden dabei ausschließlich Gestaltelemente des Basioccipitale erfasst, und es ergab sich für unsere ostafrikanische Stichprobe mit 95.1% richtiger Artzuordnungen ein akzeptables Niveau. Während alle Kaphasen korrekt klassifiziert wurden, war dies nur für 88.2% der Savannenhasen der Fall. Eine Hauptkomponentenanalyse bestätigte die erfassten Gestaltunterschiede im Basioccipitalkomplex. Während für die Kaphasen keine geschlechts- oder Lebensraum-spezifischen Gestaltunterschiede feststellbar waren, traf beides für Savannenhasen zu. Wegen dieser größeren Gestaltvariation bei den Savannenhasen empfiehlt es sich, die gegenwärtig entwickelte Diskriminanzfuntion nur regional anzuwenden, und für andere Teile der Verbreitungsgebiete der beiden Arten eigene Funktionen zu entwickeln.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angermann, R. (1983): The taxonomy of Old World Lepus. Acta Zool. Fennica 174, 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angermann, R.; Feiler, A. (1988): Zur Nomenklatur, Artabgrenzung und Variabilität der Hasen (Gattung Lepus) im westlichen Afrika (Mammalia, Lagomorpha, Leporidae). Zool. Abh. Staatl. Mus. Tierk. Dresden 43, 149–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzaroli-Puccetti, M. L. (1987): The systematic relationships of hares (genus Lepus) of the Horn of Africa. Cimbebasia, Series A 9, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben Slimen, H.; Suchentrunk, F.; Memmi, A.; Ben Ammar Elgaaied, A. (2005): Biochemical genetic relationships among Tunisian hares (Lepus sp.), South African cape hares (L. capensis), and European brown hares (L. europaeus). Biochem. Genet. 43, 577–596.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Slimen, H., Suchentrunk, F.; Shahin, A.A.B.; Ben Ammar Elgaaied, A. (2007): Phylogenetic analysis of mtCR-1 sequences of Tunisian and Egyptian hares (Lepus sp. or spp., Lagomorpha) with different coat colours. Mamm. Biol. in press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Slimen, H.; Suchentrunk, F.; Memmi, A.; Sert, H.; Kryger, U.; Alves, P. C.; Ben Ammar Elgaaied, A. (2006): Evolutionary relationships among hares from North Africa (Lepus sp.), South African cape hares (L. capensis), and European brown hares (L. europaeus), as inferred from mtDNA PCR-RFLP and allozyme data. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 44, 88–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Anatro, A.; Lessa, E. P. (2006): Geometric morphometric analysis of geographic variation in the Río Negro tuco-tuco, Ctenomys rionegrensis (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae). Mamm. Biol. 71, 288–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberger, W.; Baum, H. (1974): Handbuch der vergleichenden Anatomie der Haustiere. (Bearb. von O. Zietzschmann et al.), 18th ed. reprint. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flux, J. E.; Flux, M. M. (1983): Taxonomy and distribution of East African hares. Acta Zool. Fennica 174, 41–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flux, J. E. C., Angermann, R. (1990): Hares and Jackrabbits. In: Rabbits, Hares and Pikas. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. Ed. by J. A. Chapman, J. E. C. Flux. Gland: IUCN/SSC Lagomorph Specialist Group. Pp. 61–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, R. S.; Smith, A. T. (2005): Order Lagomorpha. In: Mammal Species of the World. 3rd ed., Vol. 1. Ed. by D. E. Wilson, D. A. M. Reeder. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. Pp. 185–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, F. C.; McCulloch, C. E. (1990): Multivariate analysis in ecology and systematics: Panacea or Pandora’s box? Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21, 129–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kryger, U. (2002): Genetic variation among South African hares (Lepus spec.) as inferred from mitochondrial DNA and microsatellites. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pretoria, RSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Martái]in, J. M.; Ruiz-Olmo, J.; Padro, I. (2006): Comparison of skull measurements and sexual dimorphism between the Minorcan pine marten (Martes martes minoricensis) and the Iberian pine marten (M. m. martes): a case of insularity. Mamm. Biol. 71, 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazak, J. H.; Groves, C. P. (2006): A taxonomic revision of the tigers (Panthera tigris) of Southeast Asia. Mamm. Biol. 71, 268–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal, K.; Cushman, S.; Stafford, S. (2000): Multivariate Statistics for Wildlife and Ecology Research. Springer: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, R. M. (ed.) (1999): Walker’s Mammals of the World. 5th ed. Vol I. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.

  • Petter, F. (1959): Elements dune revision des lievres africains du sous-genre Lepus. Mammalia 23, 41–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petter, F. (1963): Noveaux elements dune revision des lievres africains. Mammalia 27, 238–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, W. S. (1989): Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43, 223–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, T. J.; Dippenaar, N. J. (1983): The status of Lepus saxatilis, L. whytei and L. crawshayi in southern Africa. Acta Zool. Fennica, 174, 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, T. J.; Dippenaar, N. J. (1987): Morphometrics of the South African Leporidae. II. Lepus Linnaeus, 1758, and Bunolagus Thomas, 1929. Ann. Transvaal Museum 34, 379–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, A. S. (1976): Vergleichende Anatomie der Wirbeltiere. 4th ed. Hamburg and Berlin: P. Parey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sert, H.; Suchentrunk, F.; Erdogan, A. (2005): Genetic diversity in brown hares (Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778) from Anatolia and differentiation among Anatolian and European populations. Mamm. Biol. 70, 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchentrunk, F. (2004): Phylogenetic relationships between Indian and Burmese hares (Lepus nigricollis and L. peguensis) inferred from epigenetic dental characters. Mamm. Biol. 69, 28–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchentrunk, F.; Flux, J. E. C. (1996): Minor dental characters in East African cape hares and savanna hares (Lepus capensis and Lepus victoriae): a study of intra- and interspecific variability. J. Zool. (Lond.) 238, 495–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchentrunk, F.; Polster, K.; Giacometti, M.; Ratti, P.; Thulin, C. -G.; Ruhle, C.; Vasilev, A. G.; Slotta-Bachmayr, L. (1999): Spatial partitioning of allozyme variability in European mountain hares (Lepus timidus): gene pool divergence across a disjunct distributional range? Z. Saugetierkunde 64, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchentrunk, F.; Ben Slimen, H.; Sert, H. (in press): Phylogenetic aspects of nuclear and mitochondrial gene pool characteristics of South and North African cape hares (Lepus capensis) and European brown hares (L. europaeus). In: Lagomorph Biology: Evolution, Ecology, and Conservation. Ed. by P. C. Alves, N. Ferrand, K. Hacklander. Heidelberg: Springer Publication.

  • Williams, B. K.; Titus, K. (1988): Assessment of sampling stability in ecological applications of discriminant analysis. Ecology 69, 1275–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalden, D. W.; Largen, M. J.; Kock, D. (1986): Catalogue of the mammals of Ethiopia. 6. Perissodactyla, Proboscidea, Hyracoidea, Lagomorpha, Tubulidentata, Sirenia and Cetacea. Ital. J. Zool. 4 (suppl. 221), 31–103.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franz Suchentrunk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suchentrunk, F., Flux, J.E.C., Flux, M.M. et al. Multivariate discrimination between East African cape hares (Lepus capensis) and savanna hares (L. victoriae) based on occipital bone shape. Mamm Biol 72, 372–383 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2006.10.014

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2006.10.014

Key words

Navigation