Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Selection of waterbirds by Geoffroy’s cat: Effects of prey abundance, size, and distance

Selektion von Wasservögeln durch Geoffroys Katze: Auswirkungen von Abundanz, Größe und Abstand der Beute

  • Original investigation
  • Published:
Mammalian Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In spite of its wide distribution, Geoffroy’s cat (Oncifelis geoffroyi) has been recently upgraded from Least Concern IUCN category to Near Threatened because of lack of knowledge. In this study, we examine at the Mar Chiquita Biosphere Reserve (37° 46′S, 571° 27′W; Argentina) their seasonal diet, and their feeding pbl]Reference in relation to waterbird abundance, size, and distance of waterbird prey before attack. The diet, evaluated by feces analysis, was comprised of 42% waterbirds and 40% small mammals. The relative importance of waterbirds in the diet changed throughout the year associated with seasonal fluctuations in their availability. Predation on waterbirds increased from autumn to summer, while predation on small mammals decreased during this period. Trophic-niche breadth for prey occurrence was higher in autumn and lower in spring. We found that abundance, distance of waterbird prey before attack, and prey size were significant predictors of waterbird consumption by the Geoffroy’s cat. This small cat appears to change its kill rate in relation to waterbird abundance changes. The overconsumption of prey close to vegetation and big prey indicates selective predatory behavior by this cat.

Zusammenfassung

Trotz ihrer weiten Verbreitung ist Geoffroys Katze (Oncifelis geoffroyi) erst kürzlich aufgrund mangelnden Wissens zu einer bedrohten Art der IUCN Kategorie aufgewertet worden. In dieser Studie untersuchen wir saisonale Veränderungen in der Nahrung und Nahrungspräferenz der Katze in bezug auf Wasservogelabundanz und -größe, sowie des Angriffsabstands zur Beute im Biosphäreneservat Mar Chiquita (37° 46’tS, 57° 27’tW; Argentinien). Kotanalysen zeigten, dass die Nahrung zu 42% aus Wasservögeln und zu 41% aus kleineren Säugetieren besteht. Saisonale Schwankungen in der Verfügbarbeit von Wasservögeln schlagen sich in der Nahrung der Katze nieder. Die Bedeutung von Wasservögeln im Nahrungsspektrum steigt von Herbst bis Sommer an, einhergehend mit einer Abnahme des Prädationsdrucks auf kleinere Säugetiere. Die trophische Nischenbreite in der Beuteverfügbarkeit war höher im Herbst und geringer im Frühling. Die Abundanz, der Abstand zur Beute vor dem Angriff und die Beutegröße sind signifikante Faktoren, die die Konsumierungsrate von Wasservögeln durch Goeffroys Katze determinieren. Diese kleine Katze zeigt ein Beuteverhalten, das durch die Verfügbarkeit von Wasservögeln gesteuert wird. Der Mehrverbrauch an Beute, die sich nahe von Vegetation aufhält, weist auf einen selektiven Prädationsdruck durch Geoffroys Katze hin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barbini, A.; Comparatore, V. (1997): Características reproductivas, peso corporal y estructura de edades de la liebre Europea (Lepus capensis) en el Partido de Balcarce, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Rev. Argentina Prod. Anim. 17, 167–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortolus, A.; Laterra, P.; Iribarne, O. (2004): Crabmediated phenotypic changes in Spartina densiflora Brong. Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci. 59, 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozinovic, F.; Medel, R. G. (1988): Body size, energetic and foraging mode of raptors in central Chile: an inference. Oecologia 75, 456–458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Branch, L. C.; Pessino, M.; Villarreal, D. (1996): Response of pumas to a population decline of the plains vizcacha. J. Mammology 77, 1132–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branch, L. C. (1995): Observations of predation by pumas and Geoffroy’s cats on the plains vizcacha in semi-arid scrub of central Argentina. Mammalia 59, 152–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, M. (1986): Identificación de algunas espe-cies de pequenos mamiferos de la provincia de Buenos Aires mediante características de sus pelos. Physis 44, 113–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canepuccia, A. D. (2005): Efectos del incremento de las precipitaciones sobre la estructura comunitaria de un pastizal del sudeste de la Region Pampeana Argentina. Diss. thesis, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Argentina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chehebar, C.; Martín, S. (1989): Guía para el reconocimiento microscópico de los pelos de los mamíferos de la Patagonia. Doñana Acta Vertebrata 16, 247–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, R. R.; Futuyma, D. J. (1971): On the measurement of niche breadth and overlap. Ecology 52, 567–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, J. A. (1966): Ecología de una comunidad de roedores silvestres en el Partido de Rojas Provincia de Buenos Aires. Rev. Mus. Argentino Cien. Nat. “Bernardino Rivadavia” Inst. Nacional Invest. Cien. Nat. 3, 77–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, M. J. (1992): Natural Enemies. The Population Biology of Predators, Parasites and Diseases. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, J. A. (1971): Ecología del zorro gris Dusicyon gymnocercus anticus (Ameghino) en la provincia de la Pampa. Rev. Mus. Argentino Cien. Nat. “Bernardino Rivadavia” Inst. Nacional Invest. Cien. Nat. 5, 147–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Orbigny, A., Gervais, P. (1844): Nouvelle espece de Felis. Mammalogie Bull Soc. Philomatique, 40–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalby, P. L. (1975): Biology of Pampa rodents: Balcarce area Argentina. Pub. Mus. — Michigan State University, Biol. Ser. 5, 149–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • del Hoyo, J.; Elliott, A.; Sargatal, J. (1994): Handbook of the Bird of the World, New World Vultures to Guinea fowl. Lynx. Vol. 2. Barcelona: Editorial Barcelona.

  • Derting, T. L.; Crandford, J. A. (1989): Physical and behavioral correlates of prey vulnerability to barn owl (Tyto alba) predation. Am. Mid. Nat. 121, 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, L. H. (1987): Comparative feeding ecology of felids in a neotropical rainforest. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 20, 271–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farias, A. A., Canepuccia, A. D. (2001): Los carnívoros del pastizal. In: Reserva de Biósfera Mar Chiquita: Características Físicas, Biológicas y Ecológicas. Ed. by O. O. Iribarne. Mar del Plata: Editorial Martín. Pp. 305–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero, L. (2001): Avifauna de Mar Chiquita. Síntesis del trabajo realizado por Martínez M. M. In: Reserva de Biósfera Mar Chiquita: Características Físicas, Biológicas y Ecológicas. Ed. by O. O. Iribarne. Mar del Plata: Editorial Martín. Pp. 227–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiora, A. (1993): El peso de aves. Hornero 5, 174–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, B. J.; Fox, M. D. (2000): Factors determining mammal species richness on habitat islands and isolates: habitat diversity, disturbance, species interactions and guild assembly rules. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 9, 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, H. W.; Jaksic, F. M. (1983): Food niche relationship among sympatric predators: effect of level of prey identification. Oikos 40, 151–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, D. (1975): Prey availability and the food of predators. Ecology 56, 1209–1214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iriarte, J. A.; Franklin, W. L.; Johnson, W. E.; Redford, K. H. (1990): Biogeographic variation of food habits and body size of the American puma. Oecologia 85, 185–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iribarne, O. O. (Ed). (2001): Reserva de Biosfera Mar Chiquita: Características Físicas, Biológicas y Ecológicas. Mar del Plata: Editorial Martín.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isacch, J. P. (2001): Mapa de vegetación de la Reserva Mar Chiquita ý areas circundantes. In: Reserva de Biósfera Mar Chiquita: Características Físicas, Biológicas y Ecológicas. Ed. by O. O. Iribarne. Mar del Plata: Editorial Martín. Pp. 79–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaksic, F. M. (1989): What do carnivorous predators cue in on: size or abundance of mammalian prey? A crucial test in California, Chile, and Spain. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 62, 237–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. G.; Wei, W.; Reid, D. G.; Jinchu, H. (1993): Food habits of leopards (Panthera pardus fusea) in Wolong Reserve, Sichuan, China. J. Mammalogy 74, 446–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. E.; Franklin, W. L. (1991): Feeding and spatial ecology of Felis geoffroyi in southern Patagonia. J. Mammalogy 72, 815–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K. U.; Sunquist, M. E. (1995): Prey selection by tiger, leopard and dhole in tropical forest. J. Anim. Ecol. 64, 439–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J. R.; Stephens, D. W.; Sutherland, W. J. (1983): Perspectives in optimal foraging. In: Perspectives in Ornithology. Ed. by A. H. Brush and G. A. Clarck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 165–216.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. (1968): Evolution in Changing Environments. Princeton Monographs in Population Biology. Princeton, New York: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malizia, A. I., Antinuchi, D., Vassallo, A. I. (2001): Aspectos ecologicos de la comunidad de roe-dores de la reserva de Mar Chiquita con énfasis en el roedor subterráneo Ctenomys talarum. In: Reserva de Biósfera Mar Chiquita: Características Físicas, Biológicas y Ecológicas. Ed. by O. O. Iribarne. Mar del Plata: Editorial Martín. Pp. 287–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manfredi, C.; Lucherini, M.; Canepuccia, A. D.; Casanave, E. B. (2004): Geographical variation in the diet of Geoffroy’s cat (Oncifelis geoffroyi) in the Pampas grassland of Argentina. J. Mammalogy 85, 1111–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly, B. F. J. (1998): Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. 2nd ed. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, W. W. (1969): Switching in generalist predators: experiments on predator specificity and stability of prey populations. Ecol. Monogr 39, 335–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neter, J.; Wassermann, W.; Kutner, M. H. (1990): Applied Linear Statistical Models: Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Designs. 3rd ed. Homewood: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novaro, A. J.; Funes, M. C.; Walker, R. S. (2000): Ecological extinction of native prey of a carnivore assemblage in Argentine Patagonia. Biol. Conserv. 92, 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowell, K. (2002): Revision of the Felidae red list of threatened species. Cat News 37, 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palomo, G.; Iribarne, O.; Martínez, M. M. (1999): The effect of migratory seabirds guano on softbottom community of a SW Atlantic coastal lagoon. Bull. Marine Sci. 65, 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redford, K. H.; Eisenberg, J. F. (1992): Mammals of the Neotropics: The Southern Cone. Vol. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Reta, R.; Martos, P.; Perillo, G. M. E.; Piccolo, M. C.; Ferrante, A. (2001): Características hidrográficas del estuario de la laguna Mar Chiquita. In: Reserva de Biósfera Mar Chiquita: Características Físicas, Biológicas y Ecológicas. Ed. by O. O. Iribarne. Mar del Plata: Editorial Martín. Pp. 31–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J. C.; Aebischer, N. J. (1991): Comparison and quantification of carnivore diet by faecal analysis: a critique, with recommendations, based on a study of the fox Vulpes vulpes. Mammal Rev. 21, 97–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, W. R. (1989): Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43, 223–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvador, A. S. (1988): Datos de peso de aves Argentinas. Hornero 13, 78–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvador, A. S. (1990): Datos de peso de aves Argentinas. 2. Hornero 13, 169–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheel, D. (1993): Profitability, encounter rate, and prey choice of African lions. Behav. Ecol. 4, 90–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R.; Rohlf, F. J. (1995): Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. 3rd ed. New York: W. H. Freeman and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, M. E. (1949): The natural control of animal population. J. Anim. Ecol. 18, 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soriano, A.; Leon, R. J. C; Sala, O. E; Lavado, R. S; Deregibus, V. A; Cauhepé, M. A; Scaglia, O. A; Velázquez, C. A; Lemcoff, J. H; (1992): Río de La Plata grasslands. In: Natural Grasslands: Introduction and Western Hemisphere. Ecosystems of the World. Ed. by R. T. Coupland. New York: Elsevier. Pp. 367–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, D. W.; Krebs, J. R. (1986): Foraging Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1996): Nine new biosphere reserves designated by the MAB bureau — Biosphere Reserves Bull. World Network 4, 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ximenez, A. (1975): Felis geoffroyi. Mammalian Species 54, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J. H. (1984): Biostatistical Analysis. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. D. Canepuccia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Canepuccia, A.D., Martinez, M.M. & Vassallo, A.I. Selection of waterbirds by Geoffroy’s cat: Effects of prey abundance, size, and distance. Mamm Biol 72, 163–173 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2006.07.003

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2006.07.003

Key words

Navigation