Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the feeding habits of Eurasian otters on a fast flowing river and its backwater habitats

Vergleich zwischen den Ernährungsgewohnheiten der eurasischen Otter an einem schnell strömenden Fluss und an dessen toten Nebenarmen

  • Original investigation
  • Published:
Mammalian Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The diet and feeding habits of Eurasian otters Lutra lutra were studied by spraint analysis over a. 2-year period, on three sections of the Drava River and three backwaters, in south-west Hungary. The primary food was fish (mean: 89.8% and 87.5% for riverine and backwater habitats, respectively); otters living in riverine habitats compared to backwaters, consumed more birds (3.9% and 0.7%, respectively), less mammals (0.5% and 0.9%, respectively), less reptiles and amphibians (5.6% and 10.2%, respectively) and less invertebrates (0.1% and 0.6%, respectively). In riverine habitats otters preyed more frequently on larger fish than in backwaters, but the main fish prey was small-sized (below 100 g in weight, 85.6% and 91.7%, respectively). On river sections they preyed more frequently on reophil (flow preferring fish, 18.9% and 3.3%, respectively), and less on stagnophil fish (stagnant waters preferring, 9.8% and 24.5%, respectively) than in backwaters. The main fish prey was eurytopic (tolerant of rivers and stagnant waters, 71.3% and 72.2%, respectively). Preference (by Ivlev’s electivity index, Ei) in the Drava River for various fish guilds differed, as the otters preferred eurytopic (Ei= 0.30) and stagnophil fish (Ei= 0.24), and avoided reophil fish (Ei=−0.58). Otters did not threaten the rare, flow preferring fish species and the main diet consisted of economically unimportant species.

Zusammenfassung

Die Futterzusammensetzung und die Ernährungsgewohnheiten des eurasischen Otters Lutra lutra wurden zwei Jahre lang durch Exkrementanalyse an drei Abschnitten der Drau und an drei ihrer toten Nebenarme im Südwesten Ungarns untersucht und miteinander verglichen. Primäres Futter ist Fisch (durchschnittlich 89.8% Biomasse am Fluss im Vergleich zu 87.5% an den Nebenarmen). Die direkt am Fluss lebenden Ottern verzehrten mehr Vögel (3.9% gegenüber 0.7%), weniger kleine Säugetiere (0.5% gegenüber 0.9%), weniger Amphibien und Reptilien (5.6% gegenüber 10.2%) sowie Invertebrata (0.1% gegenüber 0.6%). Auch erbeuteten die direkt am Fluss lebenden Otter öfters grössere Fische als die an den Nebenarmen lebenden, aber die Hauptnahrung bildeten kleine Fische (weniger als 100 g, 85.6% gegenüber 91.7%). Sie erbeuteten auch öfters reophile (strömungsliebende) Fische als die an den Nebenarmen lebenden (18.9% gegenüber 3.3%), dafür aber seltener stagnophile (stehendes Wasser liebende) Fische (9.8% gegenüber 24.5%). Trotzdem bestand ihre Hauptbeute aus eurytopen Fischen (tolerant auf fliessendes und stehendes Gewässer) im Vergleich von 71.3% gegenüber 72.2. Die an der Drau lebenden Ottern bevorzugten unterschiedliche Fischgruppen (berechnet nach dem Index Ei laut Ivlev), wobei die eurytopen (Ei = 0.30) und stagnophilen (Ei = 0.24) Fische an erster Stelle stehen, und die reophilen (Ei = −0.58) nicht beachted wurden. Die Otter gefährdeten demzufolge nicht die selteneren, strömungsliebenden Fische, denn ihre Hauptnahrung bestand aus wirtschaftlich unwichtigen Fischarten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamek, Z.; Kortan, D.; Lepic, P.; Andreji, J. (2003): Impacts of otter (Lutra lutra) predation on fishponds: a. study of fish remains at ponds in the Czech Republic. Aquacult. Int. 11, 389–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berinkey, L. (1966): HalakPisces. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó (in Hungarian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.; Ferguson, J.; Lawrence, M.; Lees, D. (1993): Federn, Spuren und Zeichen der Vogel Europas: Ein Feldführer. Wiesbaden: AulaVerlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carss, D. N. (1995): Foraging behaviour and feeding ecology of the otter Lutra lutra: a. selective review. Hystrix 7, 179–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carss, D. N.; Kruuk, H.; Conroy, J. W. H. (1990): Predation on adult Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., by otters, Lutra lutra (L.), within the River Dee system, Aberdenshire, Scotland. J. Fish Biol. 37, 935–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chanin, P. R. F. (1985): The Natural History of Otters. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clavero, M.; Prenda, J.; Delibes, M. (2003): Trophic diversity of the otter (Lutra lutra L.) in temperate and Mediterranean freshwater habitats. J. Biogeogr. 30, 761–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, J. W. H.; Chanin, P. R. F. (2002): The status of the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra). IUCN OSG Buil. 19A, 24–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Copp, G. H.; Roche, K. (2003): Range and diet of Eurasian otters Lutra lutra (L.) in the catchment of the River Lee (Southeast England) since reintroduction. Aquatic Conservation: Marine Freshwater Ecosystems 13, 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delibes, M.; Ferreras, P.; Blazquez, C. M. (2000): Why the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) leaves a. pond? An observational test of some predictions on prey depletion. Rev. Ecol. Terre Vie 55, 57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulfer, R.; Foerster, K.; Roche, K. (1998). Habitat use, home range and behaviour. In: First Phase Report of the Trebon Otter Project. Scientific background and recommendations for conservation and management planning. Ed. by R. Dulfer and K. Roche. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. No. 93. Pp. 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlinge, S. (1967): Food habits of the fishotter Lutra lutra L. in South Swedish habitats. Viltrevy 4, 371–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlinge, S. (1968a): Territoriality of the otter Lutra lutra L. Oikos 19, 81–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlinge, S. (1968b): Food studies on captive otters (Lutra lutra L.). Oikos 19, 259–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlinge, S. (1969): Food habits of the otter Lutra lutra L. and the mink Mustela vison Schreber in a. trout water in southern Sweden. Oikos 20, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geidezis, L. C. (2002): Diet of otters (Lutra lutra) in relation to prey availability in a. fish pond area in Germany. IUCN OSG Bull. 19A, 72–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanyi, L.; Lehmann, A. (2002): DanubeDrava National Park. Budapest: Mezögazda Kiadó (in Hungarian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jedrzejewska, B.; Jedrzejewski, W. (1998): Predation in Vertebrate Communities. The Bialowieza Primeval Forest as a. Case Study. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: SpringerVerlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jedrzejewska, B.; Sidorovich, V. E.; Pikulik, M. M.; Jedrzejewski, W. (2001): Feeding habits of the otter and the American mink in Bialowieza Primeval Forest (Poland) compared to other Eurasian populations. Ecography 24, 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemenes, L.; Demeter, A. (1995): A. predictive model of the effect of environmental factors on the occurrence of otters (Lutra lutra L.) in Hungary. Hystrix 7, 209–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemenes, K. L.; Nechay, G. (1990): The food of otters Lutra lutra in different habitats in Hungary. Acta Theriol. 35, 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloskowski, J. (1999): Otter Lutra lutra predation in cypriniddominated habitats. Z. Saugetierkunde 64, 201–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knollseisen, M. (1996): Fischbestimmungsatlas, als Grundlage für nahrungsökologische Untersuchungen. Wien: BokuReports on Wildlife Research and Game Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kranz, A. (2000): Otters (Lutra lutra) increasing in Central Europe: from the threat of extinction to locally perceived overpopulation? Mammalia 64, 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, C. J. (1989): Ecological Methodology. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruuk, H. (1995): Wild Otters. Predation and Populations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruuk, H.; Moorhouse, A. (1990): Seasonal and spatial differences in food selection by otters (Lutra lutra) in Shetland. J. Zool. (London) 221, 621–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruuk, H.; Conroy, J. W. H.; Moorhouse, A. (1991): Recruitment to a. population of otters (Lutra lutra) in Shetland, in relation to fish abundance. J. Appl. Ecol. 28, 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanszki, J. (2005): Otter monitoring between 2000 and 2004 in the Drava region (Hungary). Nat. Somogy. 7, 169–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanszki, J.; Molnar, T. (2003): Diet of otters in three different habitats in Hungary. Folia Zool. 52, 378–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanszki, J.; Körmendi, S.; Hancz, C.; Martin, T. G. (2001): Examination of some factors affecting selection of fish prey by otters (Lutra lutra) living by eutrophic fish ponds. J. Zool. (London) 255, 97–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C. F.; Macdonald, S. M. (1986): Otters: Ecology and Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marz, R. (1972): Gewöll- und Rupfungskunde. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, K. (1998). The diet of otters. In: First Phase Report of the Trebon Otter Project. Scientific background and Recommendations for Conservation and Management planning. Ed. by R. Dulfer and K. Roche. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. No. 93. Pp. 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Olmo, J.; Lopez-Martin, J. M.; Palazon, S. (2001): The influence of fish abundance on the otter (Lutra lutra) populations in Iberian Mediterranean habitats. J. Zool. (London) 254, 325–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Olmo, J.; Olmo-Vidal, J. M.; Manas, S.; Batet, A. (2002): The influence of resource seasonality on the breeding patterns of the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) in Mediterranean habitats. Can. J. Zool. 80, 2178–2189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sallai, Z. (2002): Investigation of the fish fauna of the DravaMura River System. Halaszat 95, 80–91 (in Hungarian with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiemer, F.; Jungwirth, M.; Imhof, G. (1994): Die Fische der DonauGefahrdung und Schutz. Wien: Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Jugend und Familie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spindler, T. (1997): Fischfauna in Österreich. Wien: Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Jugend und Familie. SPSS 10 for Windows (1999): SPSS Inc., Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taastrom, H. -M.; Jacobsen, L. (1999): The diet of otters (Lutra lutra L.) in Danish freshwater habitats: comparison of prey fish populations. J. Zool. (London) 248, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J. -M. (1990): Seasonal exploitation of amphibians by otters Lutra lutra in northeast Scotland. J. Zool. (London) 220, 641–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise, M. H.; Linn, I. J.; Kennedy, C. R. (1981): A. comparison of the feeding biology of mink Mustela vison and otter Lutra lutra. J. Zool. (London) 195, 181–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to József Lanszki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lanszki, J., Sallai, Z. Comparison of the feeding habits of Eurasian otters on a fast flowing river and its backwater habitats. Mamm Biol 71, 336–346 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2006.04.002

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2006.04.002

Key words

Navigation