Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Skeletally Immature Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Curves 15°–24° Are at High Risk for Progression

  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study Design

Retrospective review.

Objectives

To evaluate the incidence of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) curve progression and brace prescription in skeletally immature patients (Risser 0 to Risser 1) with curves 15°–24°.

Summary of Background Data

Many skeletally immature patients with mild AIS ask about the likelihood of curve progression. No studies have answered these questions.

Methods

The charts and radiographs of 302 consecutive patients with curves 15°–24° at initial visit, Risser 0 to Risser 1, were reviewed until skeletal maturity (≥Risser 4) or surgery. Curves averaged 19.1° ± 2.9° at initial visit. The Risser grade was 0 in 247 patients (82%) and 1 in 55 patients (18%). Patients who were Risser 0 were compared with those who were Risser 1, curves 15°–19° were compared with curves 20°–24°.

Results

The majority of patients demonstrated curve progression ≥5° (65%). Patients who were Risser 0 did not progress significantly more than patients who were Risser 1 (10° vs. 8°) (p = .22). Patients with curves 20°–24° did not progress significantly more than patients with curves 15°–19° (10° vs. 9°) (p = .65).

Conclusions

Curve progression for small curves (15°–19°) is similar to curves between 20° and 24°. Close observation or perhaps early intervention for these patients is necessary. These data may suggest a paradigm shift to earlier brace initiation and call for early treatment in small curves.

Level of Evidence

Level II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lonstein JE, Carlson JM. The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984;66:1061–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bunnell WP. The natural history of idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;229:20–5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Weinstein SL, Ponseti IV. Curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983;65:447–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ylikoski M. Growth and progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in girls. J Pediatr Orthop B 2005;14:320–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Peterson LE, Nachemson AL. Prediction of progression of the curve in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of moderate severity. Logistic regression analysis based on data from the brace study of the scoliosis research society. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:823–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Little DG, Song KM, Katz D, et al. Relationship of peak height velocity to other maturity indicators in idiopathic scoliosis in girls. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82:685–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sanders JO, Browne RH, McConnell SJ, et al. Maturity assessment and curve progression in girls with idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:64–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sanders JO, Herring JA, Browne RH. Posterior arthrodesis and instrumentation in the immature (Risser-grade-0) spine in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:39–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Risser JC. The iliac apophysis: an invaluable sign in the management of scoliosis. Clin Orthop 1958;11:111–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Little DG, Sussman MD. The Risser sign: a critical analysis. J Pediatr Orthop 1994;14:569–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Biondi J, Weiner DS, Bethem D, et al. Correlation of Risser sign and bone age determination in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 1985;5:697–701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JC, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 2008;371:1527–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Karol LA, Virostek D, Felton K, et al. The effect of the Risser stage on bracing outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016;98:1253–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Katz DE, Herring JA, Browne RH, et al. Brace wear control of curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92:1343–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lenke LG, Edwards 2nd CC, Bridwell KH. The Lenke classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how it organizes curve patterns as a template to perform selective fusions of the spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:S199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Monticone M, Ambrosini E, Cazzaniga D, et al. Active self-correction and task-oriented exercises reduce spinal deformity and improve quality of life in subjects with mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Results of a randomised controlled trial. Eur Spine J 2014;23:1204–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Anwer S, Alghadir A, Shaphe A, et al. Effects of exercise on spinal deformities and quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:123848.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zapata K, Sucato D, Jo C. Physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises may reduce curve progression in mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves. Ped Phys Ther 2019;31:280–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Wright JG, et al. Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1512–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Charles YP, Dimeglio A, Canavese F, et al. Skeletal age assessment from the olecranon for idiopathic scoliosis at Risser grade 0. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:2737–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanders JO, Khoury JG, Kishan S, et al. Predicting scoliosis progression from skeletal maturity: a simplified classification during adolescence. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:540–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karina A. Zapata PT, DPT, PhD.

Additional information

Author disclosures: KAZ (none), DJS (a patent Globus with royalties paid), MCL (grants from Scoliosis Research Society, other from JBJS Classroom, outside the submitted work), CHJ (none).

IRB approval: Institutional review board approval was received from Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children and University of Texas Southwestern.

No funding was received from this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zapata, K.A., Sucato, D.J., Lee, M.C. et al. Skeletally Immature Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Curves 15°–24° Are at High Risk for Progression. Spine Deform 7, 870–874 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2019.02.012

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2019.02.012

Keywords

Navigation