Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Risk of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Decreases in Patients With Optimal Thoracic Kyphosis

  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study Design

A retrospective study of surgical outcomes.

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the preoperative risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

Summary of Background Data

The cause of PJK is still unclear, although some risk factors have been reported in ASD surgery.

Methods

A total of 185 patients who were followed up for more than two years and underwent ASD surgery were recruited. PJK was defined as a proximal junctional angle ≥20° or reoperation due to PJK within two years after surgery. These patients were divided into PJK and non-PJK groups. Whole-spine standing radiography was performed before and immediately, one year, and two years after the surgery.

Results

The PJK and non-PJK groups comprised 58 and 127 cases, respectively. The incidence of PJK demonstrated significant differences according to preoperative thoracic kyphosis (TK): 37% (TK ≤19°), 33% (TK 20°–29°), 9% (TK 30°–39°), 32% (TK 40°–49°), and 41% (TK ≥50°) (p < .05). Logistic regression analysis suggested that the amount of change in TK before and just after the surgery (ΔTK) was a significant risk factor for PJK (p < .001; odds ratio 1.062, 95% confidence interval 1.029–1.097).

Conclusion

ΔTK was less in the TK group of 30°–39° because the TK of patients who underwent ASD surgery converged to 34.5° just after surgery. Consequently, a lower or higher TK was likely to result in a large ΔTK just after surgery. Therefore, patients who had an optimal TK (30°–39°) had a lower risk of PJK.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lowe TG, Kasten MD. An analysis of sagittal curves and balance after Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for kyphosis secondary to Scheuermann’s disease. A review of 32 patients. Spine 1994; 19:1680–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim HJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis results in inferior SRS pain subscores in adult deformity patients. Spine 2013;38:896–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yagi M, King AB, Boachie-Adjei O. Incidence, risk factors, and natural course of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis. Minimum 5 years of follow-up. Spine 2012;37:1479–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cho SK, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in primary adult deformity surgery: evaluation of 20 degrees as a critical angle. Neurosurgery 2013;72:899–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim HJ, Lenke LG, Shaffrey CI, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis as a distinct form of adjacent segment pathology after spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review. Spine 2012;37:S144–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Glattes RC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity following long instrumented posterior spinal fusion: incidence, outcomes, and risk factor analysis. Spine 2005;30:1643–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum five-year follow-up. Spine 2008;33:2179–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maruo K, Ha Y, Inoue S, et al. Predictive factors for proximal junctional kyphosis in long fusions to the sacrum in adult spinal deformity. Spine 2013;38:E1469–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang J, Zhao Y, Shen B, et al. Risk factor analysis of proximal junctional kyphosis after posterior fusion in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Injury 2010;41:415–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yagi M, Akilah KB, Boachie-Adjei O. Incidence, risk factors and classification of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2011;36:E60–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim HJ, Yagi M, Nyugen J, et al. Combined anterior-posterior surgery is the most important risk factor for developing proximal junctional kyphosis in idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470:1633–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Scheer JK, Fakurnejad S, Lau D, et al. Results of the 2014 SRS Survey on PJK/PJF: a report on variation of select SRS member practice patterns, treatment indications, and opinions on classification development. Spine 2015;40:829–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu FY, Wang T, Yang SD, et al. Incidence and risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 2016;25:2376–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yan P, Bao H, Qiu Y, et al. Mismatch between proximal rod contouring and proximal junctional angle: a predisposed risk factor for proximal junctional kyphosis in degenerative scoliosis. Spine 2017;42:E280–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Han S, Hyun SJ, Kim KJ, et al. Rod stiffness as a risk factor of proximal junctional kyphosis after adult spinal deformity surgery: comparative study between cobalt chrome multiple-rod constructs and titanium alloy two-rod constructs. Spine J 2017;17:962–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hey HWD, Tan KA, Neo CS, et al. T9 versus T10 as the upper instrumented vertebra for correction of adult deformity-rationale and recommendations. Spine J 2017;17:615–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shen FH, Mason JR, Shimer AL, et al. Pelvic fixation for adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2013;22(suppl 2):S265–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kebaish KM. Sacropelvic fixation: techniques and complications. Spine 2010;35:2245–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Soroceanu A, Diebo BG, Burton D, et al. Radiographical and implant-related complications in adult spinal deformity surgery: incidence, patient risk factors, and impact on health-related quality of life. Spine 2015;40:1414–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim HJ, Boachie-Adjei O, Shaffrey CI, et al. Upper thoracic versus lower thoracic upper instrumented vertebrae endpoints have similar outcomes and complications in adult scoliosis. Spine 2014;39:E795–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Oe S, Togawa D, Nakai K, et al. The influence of age and sex on cervical spinal alignment among volunteers aged over 50. Spine 2015;40:1487–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shin Oe MD.

Additional information

Author disclosures: SO (other from Medtronic Sofamor Danec Inc., Japan Medical Dynamic Marketing, and Meitoku Medical Institution Jyuzen Memorial Hospital, outside the submitted work), DT (other from Medtronic Sofamor Danec Inc., Japan Medical Dynamic Marketing, and Meitoku Medical Institution Jyuzen Memorial Hospital, outside the submitted work), TH (none), YY (none), GY (none), SK (none), TY (none), TB (none), HA (none), YM (none), HU (none), YM (none).

IRB approval: The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oe, S., Togawa, D., Hasegawa, T. et al. The Risk of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Decreases in Patients With Optimal Thoracic Kyphosis. Spine Deform 7, 759–770 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.12.007

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.12.007

Keywords

Navigation