Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Do Curve Characteristics Influence Stenosis Location and Occurrence of Radicular Pain in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis?

  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study Design

Retrospective cohort.

Objective

The aim of this study was to describe the various locations of spinal stenosis (LSS) in lumbar scoliosis and its related clinical symptoms.

Introduction

Adults with lumbar scoliosis often present with pain and disability. Association of scoliosis and stenosis is not rare, but remains sparsely explored. Consequences of scoliosis on stenosis location and treatment remain debatable.

Methods

Patients operated for symptomatic LSS with lumbar scoliosis (Cobb angle >20°) from 2015 to 2016 were included. All patients completed preoperative clinical and neurologic examination. Coronal and sagittal radiographic parameters, rotatory subluxation (RS), and spondylolisthesis were analyzed on full spine radiographs. Computed tomographic scan multiplanar reconstructions were performed to measure central, foraminal, and lateral recess stenosis, from T10 to the sacrum.

Results

A total of 76 patients were included (69 ± 9 years old, 77% female). Sixty percent had neurogenic claudication, and L5 was the most common radicular pain (41%). The mean Cobb angle was 33° ± 16°. Overall, 35 (46%) patients had coronal malalignment; in 69%, side of the coronal tilt corresponded to side of the concavity of the lumbosacral curve. Sixty patients had RS (most frequent level L3–L4). In 50% of the cohort, RS was located at the junction between the lumbar and lumbosacral curves. In 70% (n = 53) of the patients, central stenosis occurred at the junction between the lumbar and lumbosacral curves. Foraminal and lateral stenosis were most frequently observed in the concavity of the distal lumbosacral curve. L5 radicular pain was significantly more frequent in case of lumbosacral contra-curve and right coronal malalignment.

Conclusion

LSS is frequent in lumbar scoliosis. Relationships exist between curve characteristics and symptomatic LSS in lumbar scoliosis; especially, concavity of the lumbosacral contra-curve and the junctional level between the lumbar curve and the lumbosacral contra-curve. Therefore, accurate analysis of stenosis in ASD seems mandatory, to at least perform decompression because perfect planned treatment for stenosis and scoliosis correction might not always be possible because of the patient’s general health status.

Level of Evidence

Level 4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schwab F, Farcy J-P, Bridwell K, et al. A clinical impact classification of scoliosis in the adult. Spine 2006;31:2109–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwab FJ, Smith VA, Biserni M, et al. Adult scoliosis: a quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis. Spine 2002;27:387–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, et al. Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine 2005;30:682–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, et al. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine 2005;30:2024–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, et al. Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine 2009;34:E599–606.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ames CP, Smith JS, Scheer JK, et al. Impact of spinopelvic alignment on decision making in deformity surgery in adults: a review. J Neurosurg Spine 2012;16:547–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Morin C, Deburge A. Lumbar stenosis with scoliosis. Symptomatologic study and surgical treatment of 39 cases [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1984;70:561–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fu K-MG, Rhagavan P, Shaffrey CI, et al. Prevalence, severity, and impact of foraminal and canal stenosis among adults with degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurgery 2011;69:1181–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith JS, Fu K-M, Urban P, et al. Neurological symptoms and deficits in adults with scoliosis who present to a surgical clinic: incidence and association with the choice of operative versus nonoperative management. J Neurosurg Spine 2008;9:326–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grubb SA, Lipscomb HJ, Coonrad RW. Degenerative adult onset scoliosis. Spine 1988;13:241–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Faro FD, Marks MC, Pawelek J, et al. Evaluation of a functional position for lateral radiograph acquisition in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2004;29:2284–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maillot C, Ferrero E, Fort D, et al. Reproducibility and repeatability of a new computerized software for sagittal spinopelvic and scoliosis curvature radiologic measurements: Keops(®). Eur Spine J 2015;24: 1574–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferrero E, Ould-Slimane M, Gille O, et al. Sagittal spinopelvic alignment in 654 degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 2015;24: 1219–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tassin JL, Guillaumat M, Piat L, et al. Degenerative vertebral dislocation [in French]. Ann Radiol (Paris) 1995;38:214–20.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, et al. Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:260–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Waldt S, Gersing A, Brügel M. Measurements and classifications in spine imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2014;18:219–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mamisch N, Brumann M, Hodler J, et al. Radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of spinal stenosis: results of a Delphi survey. Radiology 2012;264:174–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schonstrom NS, Bolender NF, Spengler DM. The pathomorphology of spinal stenosis as seen on CT scans of the lumbar spine. Spine 1985;10:806–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamada K, Aota Y, Higashi T, et al. Roentgenographic and computed tomographic findings in symptomatic lumbar foraminal stenosis. Eur Spine J 2015;24:333–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ohba T, Ebata S, Fujita K, et al. Characterization of symptomatic lumbar foraminal stenosis by conventional imaging. Eur Spine J 2015;24:2269–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Steurer J, Roner S, Gnannt R, et al. Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011;12:175.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee S, Lee JW, Yeom JS, et al. A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194: 1095–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mikhael MA, Ciric I, Tarkington JA, et al. Neuroradiological evaluation of lateral recess syndrome. Radiology 1981;140:97–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Burton CV, Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Yong-Hing K, et al. Causes of failure of surgery on the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981;157: 191–9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bao H, Yan P, Qiu Y, et al. Coronal imbalance in degenerative lumbar scoliosis: prevalence and influence on surgical decision-making for spinal osteotomy. Bone Joint J 2016;98B:1227–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ferrero E, Lafage R, Challier V, et al. Clinical and stereoradiographic analysis of adult spinal deformity with and without rotatory subluxation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2015;101:613–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ferrero E, Lafage R, Diebo BG, et al. Tridimensional analysis of rotatory subluxation and sagittal spinopelvic alignment in the setting of adult spinal deformity. Spine Deform 2017;5:255–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Aebi M. The adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2005;14:925–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pritchett JW, Bortel DT. Degenerative symptomatic lumbar scoliosis. Spine 1993;18:700–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Epstein JA, Epstein BS, Jones MD. Symptomatic lumbar scoliosis with degenerative changes in the elderly. Spine 1979;4:542–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Simmons ED, Simmons EH. Spinal stenosis with scoliosis. Spine 1992;17(6 suppl):S117–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Infusa A, An HS, Glover JM, et al. The ideal amount of lumbar foraminal distraction for pedicle screw instrumentation. Spine 1996;21:2218–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Attias N, Hayman A, Hipp JA, et al. Assessment of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lumbar spine foraminal stenosis—a surgeon’s perspective. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19:249–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Merkle M, Maier G, Danz S, et al. The value of dynamic radiographic myelography in addition to magnetic resonance imaging in detection lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a prospective study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2016;143:4–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lau YYO, Lee RKL, Griffith JF, et al. Changes in dural sac caliber with standing MRI improve correlation with symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 2017;26:2666–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopedic Surgery Department, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, APHP, Paris V University, 20 rue Leblanc, 75908, Paris, Cedex 15, France

    E. Ferrero MD, MSc, M. Khalifé MD, L. Marie-Hardy MD, C. Garreau De Loubresse MD & P. Guigui MD

  2. Radiology Department, Hôpital Cochin, APHP, Paris V University, 75014, Paris, France

    N. Regnard MD & A. Feydy MD

  3. Orthopedic Surgery Department, Clinique les Maussins, 75019, Paris, France

    S. Zakine MD

Authors
  1. E. Ferrero MD, MSc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Khalifé MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. Marie-Hardy MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. N. Regnard MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Feydy MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. C. Garreau De Loubresse MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. S. Zakine MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. P. Guigui MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Ferrero MD, MSc.

Additional information

Author disclosures: EF (none), MK (none), LMH (none), NR (none), AF (none), CGDL (none), SZ (none), PG (none).

IRB Approval: IRB approval was granted for this study at all participating sites.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferrero, E., Khalifé, M., Marie-Hardy, L. et al. Do Curve Characteristics Influence Stenosis Location and Occurrence of Radicular Pain in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis?. Spine Deform 7, 472–480 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.09.010

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.09.010

Keywords

Search

Navigation