Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Selective Thoracic Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Long-Term Radiographic and Functional Outcomes

  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Selective thoracic fusions (STFs) were introduced by Moe to treat the structural thoracic curve when a more flexible lumbar component existed. It is unknown how the curves behave and how the patients function beyond 20 years after surgery.

Methods

Of the 152 eligible patients with STF, 67 were traced and contacted and 40 completed outcome questionnaires (Oswestry Disability index [ODI], Scoliosis Research Society–30 [SRS-30]) and had follow-up standing radiographs. The preoperative, postoperative, 1-year, and follow-up films were compared, and the lumbar spine on follow-up assessed for signs of degeneration—disc space narrowing, osteophyte formation, rotatory subluxation, and lateral spondylolisthesis.

Results

The average follow-up was 32.7 years. There were 27 Lenke 1C, 10 Lenke 2C, and 3 Lenke 1B curves. A posterior fusion was performed in 37, with a Harrington rod used in 28 and all-hook constructs in 12 with fusion to T10 (1), T11 (10), T12 (22), or L1 (7). The average preoperative right thoracic curves were 56.1°, 36.2° 1 year postoperation, and 38.6° at follow-up. The average preoperative lumbar curve was 44.6°, being 35.2° at 1 year postoperation, and 36.9° at follow-up. Five patients had additional surgery, 3 pseudarthrosis repairs (one with extension of the fusion to L4), 1 implant removal, and 1 microdiscectomy 35 years postoperatively. At follow-up, the average ODI was 8.7 (0–62) and the average SRS-30 3.8 (1.4–4.9). Nine patients took nonnarcotic medication, usually weekly or less, with only one taking daily narcotics. The most common lumbar radiographic finding was disc space narrowing at the apex of the lumbar curve, and osteophytes at L2–L3. There was no correlation of the lumbar changes to ODI, with a tendency to more medication use with longer follow-up (older subjects).

Conclusion

At an average 33-year follow-up, the lumbar curve in STF is unchanged, with patients functioning well and mild radiographic changes in the lumbar spine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. King HA, Moe JH, Bradford DS, Winter RB. The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983;65:1302–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83:1169–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang MS, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Predicting the outcome of selective thoracic fusion in false double major lumbar “C” cases with five to twenty-four year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35:2128–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Edwards 2nd CC, Lenke LG, Peelle M, et al. Selective thoracic fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with C modifier lumbar curves: 2 to 16-year radiographic and clinical results. Spine 2014;29:536–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Larson AN, Fletcher ND, Daniel C, Richards BS. Lumbar curve is stable after selective thoracic fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 20-year follow-up. Spine 2012;37:833–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Winter RB, Lonstein JE. A meta-analysis of the literature on the issue of selective thoracic fusion for the King-Moe type II curve pattern in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003;28:948–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Bridwell KH, et al. Spontaneous lumbar curve coronal correction after selective anterior or posterior thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999;24: 1663–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Helenius I, Remes V, Yrjönen T, et al. Comparison of long-term functional and radiologic outcomes after Harrington instrumentation and spondylodesis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review of 78 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:176–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Simony A, Christensen SB, Carreon LY, Andersen MO. Radiological outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients more than 22 years after treatment. Spine Deform 2015;3:436–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Enercan M, Kahraman S, Cobanoglu M, et al. Selective thoracic fusion provides similar health-related quality of life but can cause more lumbar disc and facet joint degeneration: a comparison of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with normal population 10 years after surgery. Spine Deform 2015;3:469–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bartie BJ, Lonstein JE, Winter RB. Long-term follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients who had Harrington instrumentation and fusion to the lower lumbar vertebrae: is low back pain a problem? Spine 2009;34:E873–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 2000;25:3115–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Baldus C, Bridwell K, Harrast J, et al. The Scoliosis Research Society Health-Related Quality of Life (SRS-30) age-gender normative data: an analysis of 1346 adult subjects unaffected by scoliosis. Spine 2011;36:1154–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Green DW, Lawhorne 3rd TW, Widmann RF, et al. Long-term magnetic resonance imaging follow-up demonstrates minimal transitional level lumbar disc degeneration after posterior spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2011;36:1948–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nohara A, Kawakami N, Seki K, et al. The effects of spinal fusion on lumbar disc degeneration in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a minimum 10-year follow-up. Spine Deform 2015;3:462–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Danielsson AJ, Wiklund I, Pehrsson K, Nachemson AL. Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. Eur Spine J 2001;10:278–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pérez-Grueso FS, Fernández-Baillo N, Arauz de Robles S, García Fernández A. The low lumbar spine below Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation: long-term findings. Spine 2000;25:2333–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. de Schepper EI, Damen J, van Meurs JB, et al. The association between lumbar disc degeneration and low back pain: the influence of age, gender, and individual radiographic features. Spine 2010;35:531–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Twin Cities Spine Center, 913 E 26th Street, Suite 600, 55404, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    John E. Lonstein MD

  2. Gillette Children’s Specialty Healthcare, 200 University Ave E, 55101, St Paul, MN, USA

    John E. Lonstein MD

Authors
  1. John E. Lonstein MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John E. Lonstein MD.

Additional information

Author disclosure: JEL (other from Zimmer/Biomet Spine, outside the submitted work).

IRB Approval: The study was approved through the University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board on April 4, 2014. The study number and title that were approved are IRB 1401M47263: “Long Term Outcome (20 Years +) of Selective Fusions for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lonstein, J.E. Selective Thoracic Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Long-Term Radiographic and Functional Outcomes. Spine Deform 6, 669–675 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.04.008

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.04.008

Keywords

Search

Navigation