Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pedicled Vascularized Bone Grafts for Posterior Lumbosacral Fusion: A Cadaveric Feasibility Study and Case Report

  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study Design

Cadaveric feasibility study and case report.

Objective

To determine if it is feasible to rotate pedicled vascularized bone graft (VBG) from L1 to S1 via a posterior approach.

Summary of Background Data

VBG has been used to successfully augment fusion rates in various skeletal pathologies. Pedicled VBG has numerous advantages over free-transfer VBG, including the maintenance of a robust vascular supply to the graft without the need for vascular anastomoses. Pedicled VBG options have not been well described for posterior lumbosacral fusion.

Methods

A multidisciplinary team of plastic surgeons and neurosurgeons hypothesized that it is feasible to rotate pedicled VBG from L1 to S1 via a posterior approach. In six cadavers, two VBG donor sites were evaluated: posterior element (PE-VBG) and iliac crest (IC-VBG). A single case report of a patient with lumbar Charcot joint treated with IC-VBG is also presented.

Results

For the PE-VBG, the laminae and spinous processes were mobilized en bloc via Gill laminectomy on a unilateral sacrospinalis pedicle. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) length × width graft dimensions were 2.8±0.48 cm × 2.2±0.81 cm. The inter–transverse process (inter-TP) distance was less than the corresponding lamina length at all levels. For the IC-VBG, iliac crest was mobilized on a quadratus lumborum pedicle. Mean±SD length × width × thickness graft dimensions were 7.7±1.28 cm × 2.2±0.69 cm × 1.5±0.79 cm. The IC-VBGs reached from L1 (T12–S1) to S1 (S1–S3), and all IC-VBGs were able to cover three levels.

Conclusions

This feasibility cadaveric study and the case report are the first demonstrations that pedicled VBGs can be successfully applied to posterior lumbosacral spinal arthrodesis. Patients at high risk for nonunion may benefit from these strategies. Further clinical experience with these techniques is warranted.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berjano P, Langella F, Damilano M, et al. Fusion rate following extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 2015;24(suppl 3):369–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. DePalma AF, Rothman RH. The nature of pseudarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1968;59:113–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grubb SA, Lipscomb HJ, Suh PB. Results of surgical treatment of painful adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994;19:1619–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Herkowitz HN, Sidhu KS. Lumbar spine fusion in the treatment of degenerative conditions: current indications and recommendations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1995;3:123–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bradford DS, Ganjavian S, Antonious D, et al. Anterior strut-grafting for the treatment of kyphosis. Review of experience with forty-eight patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64:680–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bradford DS, Daher YH. Vascularised rib grafts for stabilisation of kyphosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1986;68:357–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jenkins DH, Cheng DH, Hodgson AR. Stimulation of bone growth by periosteal stripping: a clinical study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1975;57: 482–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rajasekaran S, Soundarapandian S. Progression of kyphosis in tuberculosis of the spine treated by anterior arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989;71:1314–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Han CS, Wood MB, Bishop AT, et al. Vascularized bone transfer. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74:1441–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Noorda RJ, Wuisman PI, Fidler MW, et al. Severe progressive osteoporotic spine deformity with cardiopulmonary impairment in a young patient: a case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:489–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Weiland AJ, Moore JR, Daniel RK. Vascularized bone autografts: experience with 41 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983:87–95.

  12. Winters HA, van Harten SM, van Royen BJ. The iliolumbar artery as the nutrient pedicle for an iliac crest graft: a new technique in reconstruction of the lumbar spine. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:249–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lonstein JE, Winter RB. Long multiple struts for severe kyphosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002:130–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shin AY, Bishop AT. Vascularized bone grafts for scaphoid nonunions and Kienböck’s disease. Orthop Clin North Am 2001;32:263–77. viii.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Arata MA, Wood MB. Cooney 3rd WP Revascularized segmental diaphyseal bone transfers in the canine: an analysis of viability. J Reconstr Microsurg 1984;1:11–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cutting CB, McCarthy JG. Comparison of residual osseous mass between vascularized and nonvascularized onlay bone transfers. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983;72:672–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Aydinli U, Akin S, Tirelioglu O, et al. A new autogenous graft choice in pelvic reconstructions: free vascularized rib (a case report). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2006;126:57–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim CW, Abrams R, Lee G, et al. Use of vascularized fibular grafts as a salvage procedure for previously failed spinal arthrodesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:2171–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Meyers AM, Noonan KJ, Mih AD, et al. Salvage reconstruction with vascularized fibular strut graft fusion using posterior approach in the treatment of severe spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26: 1820–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen ZC, Fan KF, Wu WC, et al. Fusion of the lumbar spine with a free vascularized fibular bone graft: case report. Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi 1998;21:463–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hubbard LF, Herndon JH, Buonanno AR. Free vascularized fibula transfer for stabilization of the thoracolumbar spine. A case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1985;10:891–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ackerman DB, Rose PS, Moran SL, et al. The results of vascularized-free fibular grafts in complex spinal reconstruction. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011;24:170–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Aliano KA, Agulnick M, Cohen B, et al. Spinal reconstruction for osteomyelitis with free vascularized fibular grafts using intraabdominal recipient vessels: a series of three cases. Microsurgery 2013;33:560–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lu DC, Wang V, Chou D. The use of allograft or autograft and expandable titanium cages for the treatment of vertebral osteomyelitis. Neurosurgery 2009;64:122–9; discussion 129–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yelizarov VG, Minachenko VK, Gerasimov OR, et al. Vascularized bone flaps for thoracolumbar spinal fusion. Ann Plast Surg 1993;31:532–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lewis SJ, Kulkarni AG, Rampersaud YR, et al. Posterior column reconstruction with autologous rib graft after en bloc tumor excision. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:346–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wilden JA, Moran SL, Dekutoski MB, et al. Results of vascularized rib grafts in complex spinal reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:832–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Robertson PA, Wray AC. Natural history of posterior iliac crest bone graft donation for spinal surgery: a prospective analysis of morbidity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:1473–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ahlmann E, Patzakis M, Roidis N, et al. Comparison of anterior and posterior iliac crest bone grafts in terms of harvest-site morbidity and functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84:716–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nocini PF, Bedogni A, Valsecchi S, et al. Fractures of the iliac crest following anterior and posterior bone graft harvesting: review of the literature and case presentation. Minerva Stomatol 2003;52:441–8. 448–452.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Quinones-Hinojosa A, Jun P, Jacobs R, et al. General principles in the medical and surgical management of spinal infections: a multidisciplinary approach. Neurosurg Focus 2004;17:E1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Kumar Kakarla MD.

Additional information

Author disclosures: MAB (none), MAM (none), JSC (none), KKA (none), JDT (none), SWC (none), MCP (none), EMR (none), UKK (none).

This study was funded by grants from the Barrow Neurological Foundation and the Newsome Family Endowed Chair of Neurosurgery.

The authors thank the Neuroscience Publications staff at Barrow Neurological Institute for assistance with illustrations and manuscript preparation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bohl, M.A., Mooney, M.A., Catapano, J.S. et al. Pedicled Vascularized Bone Grafts for Posterior Lumbosacral Fusion: A Cadaveric Feasibility Study and Case Report. Spine Deform 6, 498–506 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.02.006

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.02.006

Keywords

Navigation