Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neurologic Comorbidities Predict Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity

  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study Design

Retrospective case-control matched cohort from a single institution.

Objective

To examine the contribution of nonmechanical factors to the incidence of proximal junctional failure (PJF) after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

Summary of Background Data

Multiple studies have reported on the prevalence of PJF following surgery for ASD. However, little is known about the contribution of nonmechanical factors to the incidence of PJF.

Methods

We identified a consecutive series of ASD patients who required revision surgery for PJF between 2013 and 2015. A matched cohort of ASD patients who did not develop PJF after surgical correction was identified based on age, gender, preoperative deformity type, number of fusion levels, and the lower instrumented vertebra level. We compared medical and surgical histories in the matched cohorts, with particular attention to the prevalence of preoperative neurologic comorbidities that might affect standing balance. Preoperative, immediate postoperative, and follow-up radiographs were reviewed to document specific characteristics of mechanical failure that resulted in PJF and required revision surgery.

Results

Twenty-eight cases of PJF requiring revision surgery were identified. The prevalence rates of preoperative neurologic comorbidities in PJF cohort were significantly higher than in non-PJF cohort (75% vs. 32%, p < .001). Neurologic comorbidities included prior stroke (4), metabolic encephalopathy (2), Parkinson disease (1), seizure disorder (1), cervical and thoracic myelopathy (7), diabetic neuropathy (4), and other neuropathy (4). The mean preoperative sagittal vertical axis in PJF cohort was more positive compared with the non-PJF cohort (144 mm vs. 65 mm, p = .009) There were no significant differences in immediate postoperative or follow-up radiographic parameters between cohorts.

Conclusions

In this study, risk factors identified for the development of PJF included nonmechanical neurologic comorbidities, emphasizing the need to look beyond radiographic alignment in order to reduce the incidence of PJF.

Level of Evidence

Level 3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schwab F, el-Fegoun AB, Gamez L, et al. A lumbar classification of scoliosis in the adult patient: preliminary approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:1670–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arlet V, Aebi M. Junctional spinal disorders in operated adult spinal deformities: present understanding and future perspectives. Eur Spine J 2013;22(Suppl 2):S276–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rose PS, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Role of pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis, and patient factors on sagittal plane correction following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:785–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith JS, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, et al. Dynamic changes of the pelvis and spine are key to predicting postoperative sagittal alignment after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a critical analysis of preoperative planning techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37: 845–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Le Huec JC, Leijssen P, Duarte M, et al. Thoracolumbar imbalance analysis for osteotomy planification using a new method: FBI technique. Eur Spine J 2011;20(Suppl 5):669–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Glassman SD, Hamill CL, Bridwell KH, et al. The impact of perioperative complications on clinical outcome in adult deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:2764–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Crawford 3rd CH, Carreon LY, Bridwell KH, et al. Long fusions to the sacrum in elderly patients with spinal deformity. Eur Spine J 2012;21:2165–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhagat S, Vozar V, Lutchman L, et al. Morbidity and mortality in adult spinal deformity surgery: Norwich Spinal Unit experience. Eur Spine J 2013;22(Suppl l):S42–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weistroffer JK, Perra JH, Lonstein JE, et al. Complications in long fusions to the sacrum for adult scoliosis: minimum five-year analysis of fifty patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:1478–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Charosky S, Guigui P, Blamoutier A, et al. Complications and risk factors of primary adult scoliosis surgery: a multicenter study of 306 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:693–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Scheer JK, Tang JA, Smith JS, et al. Reoperation rates and impact on outcome in a large, prospective, multicenter, adult spinal deformity database: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 2013;19:464–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cho SK, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Major complications in revision adult deformity surgery: risk factors and clinical outcomes with 2- to 7-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37: 489–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Glattes RC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity following long instrumented posterior spinal fusion: incidence, outcomes, and risk factor analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:1643–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Sagittal thoracic decompensation following long adult lumbar spinal instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1: causes, prevalence, and risk factor analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:2359–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hostin R, McCarthy I, O’Brien M, et al. Incidence, mode, and location of acute proximal junctional failures after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38: 1008–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hart RA, McCarthy I, Ames CP, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis and proximal junctional failure. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2013;24: 213–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hart R, McCarthy I, O’Brien M, et al. Identification of decision criteria for revision surgery among patients with proximal junctional failure after surgical treatment of spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:E1223–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum five-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:2179–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim HJ, Lenke LG, Shaffrey CI, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis as a distinct form of adjacent segment pathology after spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37: S144–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mendoza-Lattes S, Ries Z, Gao Y, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult reconstructive spine surgery results from incomplete restoration of the lumbar lordosis relative to the magnitude of the thoracic kyphosis. Iowa Orthop J 2011;31:199–206.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Yagi M, King AB, Boachie-Adjei O. Incidence, risk factors, and natural course of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis. Minimum 5 years of follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:1479–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Maruo K, Ha Y, Inoue S, et al. Predictive factors for proximal junctional kyphosis in long fusions to the sacrum in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:E1469–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim HJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis results in inferior SRS pain subscores in adult deformity patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:896–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lau D, Clark AJ, Scheer JK, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis and failure after spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review of the literature as a background to classification development. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:2093–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Glassman SD, Dimar 2nd JR, Carreon LY. Revision rate after adult deformity surgery. Spine Deform 2015;3:199–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Daubs MD, Lenke LG, Cheh G, et al. Adult spinal deformity surgery: complications and outcomes in patients over age 60. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:2238–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Inoue S, Khashan M, Fujimori T, et al. Analysis of mechanical failure associated with reoperation in spinal fusion to the sacrum in adult spinal deformity. J Orthop Sci 2015;20:609–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Glassman SD, Coseo MP, Carreon LY. Sagittal balance is more than just alignment: why PJK remains an unresolved problem. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016;11:1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. O’Brien M, Kuklo T, Blanke K, et al. Spinal deformity study group radiographic measurement manual. Memphis, TN: Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.; 2005.

  31. Ames CP, Smith JS, Scheer JK, et al. Impact of spinopelvic alignment on decision making in deformity surgery in adults: a review. J Neurosurg Spine 2012;16:547–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yoshida G, Yasuda T, Togawa D, et al. Craniopelvic alignment in elderly asymptomatic individuals: analysis of 671 cranial centers of gravity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:1121–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Banno T, Togawa D, Arima H, et al. The cohort study for the determination of reference values for spinopelvic parameters (T1 pelvic angle and global tilt) in elderly volunteers. Eur Spine J 2016;25: 3687–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Arima H, Yamato Y, Hasegawa T, et al. Discrepancy between standing posture and sagittal balance during walking in adult spinal deformity patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017;42: E25–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, et al. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980;66:271–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. EuroQol Group. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990;16:199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee GA, Betz RR, Clements 3rd DH, et al. Proximal kyphosis after posterior spinal fusion in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:795–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim HJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Patients with proximal junctional kyphosis requiring revision surgery have higher postoperative lumbar lordosis and larger sagittal balance corrections. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:E576–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cho SK, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in primary adult deformity surgery: evaluation of 20 degrees as a critical angle. Neurosurgery 2013;72:899–906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. O’Leary PT, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Risk factors and outcomes for catastrophic failures at the top of long pedicle screw constructs: a matched cohort analysis performed at a single center. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:2134–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang J, Zhao Y, Shen B, et al. Risk factor analysis of proximal junctional kyphosis after posterior fusion in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Injury 2010;41:415–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cammarata M, Aubin CE, Wang X, et al. Biomechanical risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis: a detailed numerical analysis of surgical instrumentation variables. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39: E500–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kebaish KM, Martin CT, O’Brien JR, et al. Use of vertebroplasty to prevent proximal junctional fractures in adult deformity surgery: a biomechanical cadaveric study. Spine J 2013;13:1897–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hart RA, Prendergast MA, Roberts WG, et al. Proximal junctional acute collapse cranial to multi-level lumbar fusion: a cost analysis of prophylactic vertebral augmentation. Spine J 2008;8: 875–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hassanzadeh H, Gupta H, Jain A, et al. Significant effect on the incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis and outcome in adults after long posterior spinal fusion. Spine Deform 2013;1: 299–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bourghli A, Guerin P, Vital JM, et al. Posterior spinal fusion from T2 to the sacrum for the management of major deformities in patients with Parkinson disease: a retrospective review with analysis of complications. J Spinal Disord Tech 2012;25:E53–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Babat LB, McLain RF, Bingaman W, et al. Spinal surgery in patients with Parkinson’s disease: construct failure and progressive deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:2006–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hideyuki Arima MD, PhD.

Additional information

Author disclosures: HA (personal fees from Norton Healthcare, outside the submitted work), SDG (employee of Norton Healthcare, grants to institution from Norton Healthcare, patents and royalties from Medtronic), JRD (consultancy fees from Medtronic and DePuy; personal fees from Medtronic, DePuy, and Norton Healthcare; patents from Medtronic, royalties, and other from JBJS Highlights, Spine, Spine Deformity, JAAOS and Global Spine; is a member of the SRS Board), YM (none), LYC (other from Spine, other from Spine Journal, other from University of Louisville, other from Scoliosis Research Society, personal fees from Washington University, personal fees from AO Spine, personal fees from Norton Healthcare, grants from Orthopedic Research and Educational Fund, grants from Scoliosis Research Society, grants from the Norton Healthcare James R. Petersdorf Fund, personal fees from University of Louisville, personal fees from Association for Collaborative Spine Research, personal fees from Center for Spine Surgery and Research, Region of Southern Denmark, other from NuVasive, outside the submitted work).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arima, H., Glassman, S.D., Dimar, J.R. et al. Neurologic Comorbidities Predict Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity. Spine Deform 6, 576–586 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.01.008

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.01.008

Keywords

Navigation