Summary
179 patients with congenital rib fusions treated with rib-based or spine-based constructs and minimum 2-year follow-up were reviewed. 19 patients were treated with proximal spine-based and 160 with proximal rib-based devices. Patients treated with growing rods achieved equivalent SAL to those treated with rib-based devices, while also achieving greater improvement to their spine deformity, as measured by postoperative kyphosis, and Cobb angle.
Author information
Consortia
Additional information
Author disclosures: Fady Baky: none. Larson A Noelle: K2M; Orthopediatrics. David Skaggs: Growing Spine Foundation; Growing Spine Study Group; Scoliosis Research Society, Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics; Spine Deformity; Biomet; Orthobullets; Grand Rounds; Medtronic; Zipline Medical, Inc; Grand Rounds; Zimmer Biomet; Greensunmedical; Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation: Scientific Forum Grant/Spine Care; Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America & Scoliosis Research Society, paid to Columbia University; Ellipse; Wolters Kluwer Health-Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; Medtronic & Biomet; Biomet Spine; Johnson and Johnson. Tricia St. Hilaire: none. Jeff Pawelek: San Diego Spine Foundation; Growing Spine Foundation; Nuvasive. John Emans: Journal of Children’s Orthopedics; Medtronic; Medtronic Sofamor Danek; Depuy Synthes; Synthes. Joshua Pahys: Depuy; DePuy and Globus; DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company; Globus Medical. Children’s Spine Study Group: DePuy Synthes Research Grant. Growing Spine Study Group: Growing Spine Foundation Research Grant Nuvasive Research Grant.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baky, F., Noelle, L.A., Skaggs, D. et al. Paper #30: Congenital Spine Deformity with Fused Ribs Treated with Proximal Rib- vs. Spine-Based Growing Constructs. Spine Deform 5, 454–455 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.09.033
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.09.033