Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Current Evidence Regarding the Diagnostic Methods for Pediatric Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Report From the Scoliosis Research Society Evidence Based Medicine Committee

  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study Design

Structured literature review.

Objectives

The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) requested an assessment of the current state of peer-reviewed evidence regarding pediatric lumbar spondylolisthesis with the goal of identifying what is known and what gaps remain in further understanding the diagnostic methods for pediatric spondylolisthesis.

Summary of Background Data

Spondylolisthesis in the lumbar spine is common among children and adolescents and no formal synthesis of the published literature regarding diagnostic methods has been previously performed.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was performed. Abstracts were reviewed and data from included studies were analyzed by the committee. From 6600 initial citations with abstract, 663 articles underwent full-text review. The best available evidence for the clinical questions regarding diagnostic methods was provided by 26 included studies. Six of the studies were graded as Level III (retrospective comparative), and represent the current best available evidence whereas 20 of the studies were graded as Level IV (retrospective case series) evidence. No Level V (expert opinion) studies were included in the final list. None of the studies were graded as Level I or Level II.

Results

Plain radiography is the workhorse imaging modality for diagnosing spondylolisthesis. No association between radiologic grade of spondylolisthesis and clinical presentation were noted; however, grade III and IV slips more often required surgery, and increasing slip angles were associated with worse baseline outcome scores.

There is Level III evidence that the Meyerding grade appears to be more accurate for measuring slip percentage whereas the Lonstein Slip angle and Dubousset Lumbosacral Kyphosis angles are the best for measuring lumbosacral kyphosis in spondylolisthesis. In addition, higher sacral table index, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, and lower sacral table angle were associated with spondylolisthesis. True incidence could not be determined by the current literature available. However, studies in adolescent athletes demonstrated an incidence of 6% to 7% across studies.

Conclusions

The current “best available” evidence to guide the diagnosis and characterization of pediatric spondylolisthesis is presented. Future studies are needed to provide more high-quality evidence to answer these clinically relevant questions.

Level of Evidence

Level III, review of Level III studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhatia NN, Chow G, Timon SJ, Watts HG. Diagnostic modalities for the evaluation of pediatric back pain—a prospective study. J Pediatr Orthop 2008;28:230–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett DL, Nassar L, DeLano MC. Lumbar spine MRI in the elite-level female gymnast with low back pain. Skelet Radiol 2006;35:503–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ikata T, Miyake R, Katoh S, et al. Pathogenesis of sports-related spondylolisthesis in adolescents—radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Sports Med 1996;24:94–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Alyas F, Turner M, Connell D. MRI findings in the lumbar spines of asymptomatic, adolescent, elite tennis players. Br J Sports Med 2007;41:836–41; discussion 841.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Butt S, Saifuddin A. The imaging of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Clin Radiol 2005;60:533–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Glavas P, Mac-Thiong JM, Parent S, et al. Assessment of lumbosacral kyphosis in spondylolisthesis: a computer-assisted reliability study of six measurement techniques. Eur Spine J 2009;18:212–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wiltse LL, Winter RB. Terminology and measurement of spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983;65:768–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Motley G, Nyland J, Jacobs J, Caborn DN. The pars interarticularis stress reaction, spondylolysis, and spondylolisthesis progression. J Athl Train 1998;33:351–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tanguay F, Mac-Thiong JM, Wang Z, et al. Developmental spondylolisthesis: is slip angle related to quality of life? Stud Health Technol Inform 2010;158:182–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Timon SJ, Gardner MJ, Wanich T, et al. Not all spondylolisthesis grading instruments are reliable. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;434:157–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McCarty ME, Mehlman CT, Tamai J, et al. Spondylolisthesis: intraobserver and interobserver reliability with regard to the measurement of slip percentage. J Pediatr Orthop 2009;29:755–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang Z, Mac-Thiong JM, Parent S, et al. The relevance of sacral and sacro-pelvic morphology in developmental lumbosacral spondylolisthesis: are they equally important? Eur Spine J 2014;23:157–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang Z, Parent S, Mac-Thiong JM, et al. Influence of sacral morphology in developmental spondylolisthesis. Spine 2008;33:2185–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tanguay F, Labelle H, Wang Z, et al. Clinical significance of lumbosacral kyphosis in adolescent spondylolisthesis. Spine 2012;37:304–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rossi F, Dragoni S. The prevalence of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in symptomatic elite athletes: radiographic findings. Radiography 2001;7:37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Toueg CW, Mac-Thiong JM, Grimard G, et al. Prevalence of spondylolisthesis in a population of gymnasts. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010;158:132–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Toueg CW, Mac-Thiong JM, Grimard G, et al. Spondylolisthesis, sacro-pelvic morphology and orientation in young gymnasts. J Spinal Disord Tech 2015;28:E358–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Han Jo Kim MD.

Additional information

HJK (personal fees from Zimmer Biomet, K2M, and AOSpine, outside the submitted work); CHC (personal fees from Alphatec Spine, personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from Titan Spine, outside the submitted work); CL (personal fees from Greatbatch, Inc, outside the submitted work); SB (grants from DePuy Synthes, NuVasive, BioMet, Orthofix, Innovasis, Stryker, and K2 Medical, outside the submitted work); ANL (grants from NIH and Scoliosis Research Society, other from Orthopediatrics and K2M, outside the submitted work); MG (none); MO (none); JOS (holds stock in General Electric, Abvie, Abbot Labs, GreenSun, and Biomedical Enterprises; receives payment for speaking on spinal growth from NuVasive); DB (reports grants and personal fees from DePuy Spine; nonfinancial support from International Spine Study Group, Scoliosis Research Society, and University of Kansas Physicians, outside the submitted work).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, H.J., Crawford, C.H., Ledonio, C. et al. Current Evidence Regarding the Diagnostic Methods for Pediatric Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Report From the Scoliosis Research Society Evidence Based Medicine Committee. Spine Deform 6, 185–188 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.08.010

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.08.010

Keywords

Navigation