Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Who Needs a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit After Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Hypotensive events (HEs) following posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) can lead to delayed neurologic postoperative deficits (DNPD). This study aimed to determine the incidence of HEs (mean arterial pressure [MAP] < 60 mmHg) after PSF for AIS and identify predictors for HEs.

Methods

Medical records of 99 consecutive patients who had PSF for AIS were retrospectively reviewed (2011–2013). Perioperative data were collected. Patients were divided into two groups based on MAP readings by an arterial line in the pediatric intensive care unit immediately postoperatively into postoperative day one: Group 1 (MAP ≥60 mmHg) and Group 2 (multiple occurrences of MAPs < 60 mmHg).

Mean values were compared using the independent t test. Multiple logistic regression was used to estimate the association of preoperative and intraoperative parameters with multiple HEs.

Results

Group 1 had 68 patients (68.7%) and Group 2 had 31 patients (31.3%). None of the compared parameters were associated significantly with multiple HE. However, patients who did not exhibit HEs within the first four hours postoperatively remained stable throughout the rest of the postoperative period. Only those with HEs in the first four hours experienced subsequent HEs in the first 24 hours. There were no DNPD or other major complications.

Conclusion

Results showed that the incidence of HEs after PSF in AIS can be as high as 31.3%. We did not find any significant risk factors. Although DNPD after PSF is a rare complication and we had none in this series, we suggest that these patients with multiple HEs may be at risk for DNPD as a result of hypotension and potential for cord ischemia. Therefore, all patients after PSF should be monitored in a pediatric intensive care unit—type environment or postanesthesia recovery room initially. If stable for, at least, the initial four hours, then patients should be good candidates for a less intensive environment.

Level of Evidence

Level 3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hefti FL, McMaster MJ. The effect of the adolescent growth spurt on early posterior spinal fusion in infantile and juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1983;65:247–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine 2003;28(15 Suppl):S26–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lenke LG, Newton PO, Marks MC, et al. Prospective pulmonary function comparison of open versus endoscopic anterior fusion combined with posterior fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2004;28:2055–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brzezinski WA. Blood pressure. In: Walker HK, Hall WD, Hurst JW, editors. Clinical methods: the history, physical, and laboratory examinations. Boston, MA: Butterworths; 1990. p. 95–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coe JD, Arlet V, Donaldson W, et al. Complications in spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the new millennium: a report of the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Spine 2006;31:345–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Auerbach JD, Kean K, Milby AH, et al. Delayed postoperative neurologic deficits in spinal deformity surgery. Spine 2016;41:E131–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lenke LG, Dobbs MB. Idiopathic scoliosis. In: Frymoyer JW, Wiesel SW, editors. The adult and pediatric spine. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2004. p. 337–59.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shan L, Skaggs DL, Lee C, et al. Intensive care unit versus hospital floor: a comparative study of postoperative management of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95:e40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schwartz DM, Auerbach JD, Dormans JP, et al. Neurophysiological detection of impending spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:2440–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hod-Feins R, Abu-Kishk I, Eshel G, et al. Risk factors affecting the immediate postoperative course in pediatric scoliosis surgery. Spine 2007;32:2355–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence L. Haber MD.

Additional information

LLH (personal fees from Orthopediatrics, outside the submitted work); EDW (none); MS (none); JAM (none); MWS (paid consultant for Orthopediatrics and DePuy Spine).

The authors thank Patrick B. Wright, MD, University of Mississippi Medical Center, for contributing a portion of the patients for the study, and Alan Penman, PHD, MPH, University of Mississippi Medical Center, for his contributions toward statistical design and analysis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haber, L.L., Womack, E.D., Sathyamoorthy, M. et al. Who Needs a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit After Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?. Spine Deform 6, 137–140 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.08.006

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.08.006

Keywords

Navigation