Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sagittal Spine Length Measurement: A Novel Technique to Assess Growth of the Spine

  • Case Series
  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study Design

The accuracy and repeatability of a novel sagittal spine length (SSL) radiographic measurement was examined using photographic and radiographic imaging.

Objectives

To validate the new SSL technique for measuring growth in early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients.

Summary of Background Data

Current assessment of patient growth undergoing growth-friendly surgical treatment for EOS is the use of serial vertical spine height measurements (VH) on coronal radiographs. Spine-based distraction implants are able to control the coronal plane deformity of scoliosis, but exhibit a “law of diminishing returns” in the impact of each follow-up lengthening surgery. As these treatments are kyphogenic, we hypothesize that the increase in kyphosis is, in fact, growth out of plane, not captured by standard spine height measurements.

Methods

Measurement accuracy was assessed using 6 spine model alignments and clinical radiographs of 23 retrospective EOS patients. Inter- and intrarater reliabilities were assessed using interclass coefficient (ICC) analyses. The discrepancy between the VH and SSL was also investigated.

Results

The model assessment showed excellent accuracy, with a 1.54 mm (SD: 1.07, range: 0.03–3.14, p =.226) mean error and mean ICCs of 0.999. As the kyphosis increased, a progressive difference between the phantom VH and SSL was observed. Interrater reliability ICCs of the clinical radiographs averaged 0.981 and 0.804, whereas intrarater reliabilities averaged 0.966 and 0.826, for the coronal and sagittal radiographs, respectively. Mean clinical SSLs were 177.5 mm (SD: 28.5, range: 114.3–250.3), whereas the VH averaged 161.6 mm (SD: 31.8, range: 58.5–243.0), resulting in a 16.0-mm (SD: 16.7, range: 0.3–90.3, p <.0001) difference between the two measurements with a progressive difference as the kyphosis increased.

Conclusions

The novel SSL measurement is accurate, repeatable, and complements the current growth assessments for EOS treatments. Until sagittal spine lengths are taken into consideration, the “law of diminishing returns” should be interpreted with caution.

Level of Evidence

Level II — Prospective Comparative Study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. El-Hawary R, Akbarnia BA. Early onset scoliosis—time for consensus. Spine Deform 2015;3:105–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Skaggs DL, Guillaume T, El-Hawary R, et al. Early onset scoliosis consensus statement, SRS Growing Spine Committee, 2015. Spine Deform 2015;3:107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams BA, Matsumoto H, McCalla DJ, et al. Development and initial validation of the Classification of Early-Onset Scoliosis (C-EOS). J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:1359–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dimeglio A. Growth of the spine before age 5 years. J Pediatr Orthop B 1993;1:102–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dimeglio A. Growth in pediatric orthopaedics. J Pediatr Orthop 2001;21:549–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. El-Hawary R, Samdani A, Wade J, et al; Children’s Spine Study Group. Rib-based distraction surgery maintains total spine growth. J Paediatr Orthop 2015:1-6. Epub ahead of Print.

  7. Sankar WN, Skaggs DL, Yazici M, et al. Lengthening of dual growing rods and the law of diminishing returns. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:806–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fletcher ND, McClung A, Rathjen KE, et al. Serial casting as a delay tactic in the treatment of moderate-to-severe early-onset scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2012;32:664–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shah S, Karatas AF, Dhawale AA, et al. The effect of serial growing rod lengthening on the sagittal profile and pelvic parameters in early-onset scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:E1311–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schroerlucke SR, Akbarnia BA, Pawelek JB, et al. How does thoracic kyphosis affect patient outcomes in growing rod surgery? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:1303–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dede O, Motoyama EK, Yang CI, et al. Pulmonary and radiographic outcomes of VEPTR (vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib) treatment in early-onset scoliosis”. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:1295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dreimann M, Hoffmann M, Kossow K, et al. Scoliosis and chest cage deformity measures predicting impairments in pulmonary function: a cross-sectional study of 492 patients with scoliosis to improve the early identification of patients at risk. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:2024–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zeng Y, Chen Z, Ma D, et al. The influence of kyphosis correction surgery on pulmonary function and thoracic volume. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:1777–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan J. Spurway PEng, MSc.

Additional information

Author disclosures

AJS (grants from Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency, during the conduct of the study), CKC (none), WEK (none), JKH (grants from Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency, during the conduct of the study), REH (grants from Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency, during the conduct of the study; grants, personal fees and other from Depuy Synthes Spine, grants from Medtronic Canada, personal fees from AO Spine, personal fees from Halifax Biomedical Inc., grants from Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency, grants from CIHR, grants from Tecterra, grants from Canadian Paediatric Spine Society, grants from SRS, grants and other from POSNA, grants from EOS Imaging, grants from OREF, grants from Dalhousie University Department of Surgery, other from Children’s Spine Foundation, outside the submitted work).

This study was reviewed and approved by the research ethics board of the IWK Health Centre on August 19, 2013.

This project was not funded directly by any source. Research staff wages were provided via a grant awarded to the IWK by the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spurway, A.J., Chukwunyerenwa, C.K., Kishta, W.E. et al. Sagittal Spine Length Measurement: A Novel Technique to Assess Growth of the Spine. Spine Deform 4, 331–337 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2016.03.002

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2016.03.002

Keywords

Navigation