Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preoperative MRSA Screening in Pediatric Spine Surgery: A Helpful Tool or a Waste of Time and Money?

  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To review the use of preoperative screening for Staphylococcus aureus for all pediatric spine procedures that was instituted at our facility in a multimodal approach to decrease the frequency of postoperative wound infections.

Summary of Background Data

Four years ago at our facility, a multimodal approach to decrease the frequency of postoperative infections after pediatric spine surgery was instituted.

Methods

A single-center, single-surgeon pediatric spine surgery database was queried to identify all patients who had preoperative S. aureus nasal swab screening. Data collected included demographic data, diagnoses, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) swab findings, bacterial antibiotic sensitivities, and outcome of the spine surgery.

Results

A total of 339 MRSA screenings were performed. Twenty (5.9%) were MRSA positive, and 55 (16.2%) were methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) positive. In the MRSA-positive group, 13 were neuromuscular, 5 were adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), 1 congenital, and 1 infantile idiopathic scoliosis. Of the MRSA-positive screenings, 13 (65.0% of MRSA-positive screenings; 3.8% of entire cohort) of were newly identified cases (9 neuromuscular, 3 AIS, and 1 congenital diagnoses). In the 55 MSSA-positive, 6 documented resistance to either cefazolin or clindamycin. Hence, in up to 22 of the preoperative screenings (6.5% of entire cohort; 16 MRSA and 6 MSSA showed antibiotic resistance), the preoperative antibiotic regimen could be altered to appropriately cover the identified bacterial resistances. During the study period, there were 11 patients who were diagnosed with a postoperative deep wound infection, none of them having positive screenings.

Conclusion

The use of preoperative nasal swab MRSA screening permitted adjustment of the preoperative antibiotic regimen in up to 6.5% of patients undergoing pediatric spine surgery. This inexpensive, noninvasive tool can be used in preoperative surgical planning for all patients undergoing spinal procedures.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cahill PJ, Warnick DE, Lee MJ, et al. Infection after spinal fusion for pediatric spinal deformity: thirty years of experience at a single institution. Spine 2010;35:1211–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen AF, Chivukula S, Jacobs LJ, et al. What is the prevalence of MRSA colonization in elective spine cases? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470:2684–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Labbe AC, Demers AM, Rodrigues R, et al. Surgical-site infection following spinal fusion; a case-control study in a children’s hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:591–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li Y, Glotzbecker M, Hedequist D. Surgical site infection after pediatric spinal deformity surgery. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2012;5:111–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nandyala SV, Schwend RM. Prevalence of intraoperative tissue bacterial contamination in posterior pediatric spinal deformity surgery. Spine 2013;38:E482–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Theologis AA, Demirkiran G, Callahan M, et al. Local intrawound vancomycin powder decreases the risk of surgical site infections in complex adult deformity reconstruction: a cost analysis. Spine 2014;39:1875–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Abdul-Jabbar A, Berven SH, Hu SS, et al. Surgical site infections in spine surgery: identification of microbiologic and surgical characteristics in 239 cases. Spine 2013;38:E1425–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hidron AI, Edwards JR, Patel J, et al. National Healthcare Safety Network Team; Participating National Healthcare Safety Network Facilities. NHSN annual update: antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: annual summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006–2007. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:996–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen AF, Wessel CB, Rao N. Staphylococcus aureus screening and decolonization in orthopaedic surgery and reduction of surgical site infections. Clin Orthop 2013;471:2383–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vitale MG, Riedel MD, Glotzbecker M, et al. Building consensus: development of a best practice guideline (BPG) for surgical site infections (SSI) prevention in high risk pediatric spine surgery. J Pediatr Orthop 2013;33:471–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Glotzbecker MP, Garg S, Akbarnia BA, et al. Surgeon practices regarding infection prevention for growth friendly spinal procedures. J Child Orthop 2014;8:245–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Glotzbecker MP, Vitale MG, Shea KG, et al. POSNA committee on the Quality, Safety, Value Initiative (QSVI). J Pediatr Orthop 2013;33:694–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sweet FA, Roth M, Sliva C. Intrawound application of vancomycin for prophylaxis in instrumented thoracolumbar fusion: efficacy, drug level, and patient outcomes. Spine 2011;36:2084–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gans I, Dormans JP, Spiegel DA, et al. Adjunctive vancomycin powder in pediatric spine surgery is safe. Spine 2013;38:1703–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zebala LP, Chuntarapas T, Kelly MP, et al. Intrawound vancomycin powder eradicates surgical wound contamination: an in vivo rabbit study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:46–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Thakkar V, Ghobrial GM, Maulucci CM, et al. Nasal MRSA colonization: impact on surgical site infection following spine surgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014;125:94–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Calderone RR, Garland DE, Capen DA, et al. Cost of medical care for postoperative spinal infections. Orthop Clin North Am 1996;27:171–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott J. Luhmann MD.

Additional information

Author disclosures

SJL (personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from Stryker, personal fees from Orthofix, outside the submitted work; In addition, Dr. Luhmann has a patent with Lippincott with royalties paid, and a patent with Globus Medical with royalties paid), JCS (none).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luhmann, S.J., Smith, J.C. Preoperative MRSA Screening in Pediatric Spine Surgery: A Helpful Tool or a Waste of Time and Money?. Spine Deform 4, 272–276 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2015.12.006

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2015.12.006

Keywords

Navigation