Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

High-Volume Hospitals and Surgeons Experience Fewer Early Reoperation Events After Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery

  • Case Series
  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study Design

Retrospective analysis of relevant in-hospital patient records from the New York State Inpatient Database.

Objective

We aimed to assess reoperation risk in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) by surgeon and hospital operative volume.

Summary of Background Data

The need for early reoperation can be devastating for patient and family, is a burden to the physician and adds significant cost. Previous studies have shown improved outcomes associated with higher volume surgeons and hospitals, but reoperation events have not yet been explored.

Methods

The 2008-2011 New York State Inpatient Database was queried using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients aged 10-21 undergoing spine arthrodesis. Patient identifiers and revisit linkage variables were used to identify reoperation events. Annual surgeon and hospital volumes were stratified into tertiles (low, medium, high) via identifier codes. The relative risk of reoperation after spine arthrodesis was computed based on relevant patient inpatient stays.

Results

Over 2008 to 2011, a total of 3,928 primary fusion operations for AIS were identified. The overall rate of reoperation after spine fusion for idiopathic scoliosis was 7. 1%. Low volume surgeons performed less than 6 AIS fusions per year, medium volume surgeons performed less than 43, and high volume surgeons performed from 43 to 228. Reoperation after a primary fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis showed reduced frequency among higher volume surgeons (14. 1% for low vs. 5. 1% for high, p<0. 001, see Table for Hospitals).

Conclusions

Early reoperation after spine fusion for idiopathic scoliosis is seen more frequently in lower volume institutions and surgeons. Appreciating the resources and limitations at a clinician’s institution is important to developing practices to prevent these devastating events. This work also has implications for strategies that aim to direct limited healthcare resources to centers with low complication rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hibbs RA. An operation for progressive spinal deformities: a preliminary report of three cases from the service of the orthopaedic hospital. 1911. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;2:17–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dasenbrock HH, Clarke MI, Witham TF, Sciubba DM, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A. The impact of provider volume on the outcomes after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Neurosurgery 2012;2:1346–53; discussion 1353-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Farjoodi P, Skolasky RL, Riley LH. The effects of hospital and surgeon volume on postoperative complications after lumbar spine surgery. Spine 2011;2:2069–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shervin N, Rubash HE, Katz JN. Orthopaedic procedure volume and patient outcomes: a systematic literature review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;2:35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N EnglJ Med 1979;2:1364–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lonner BS, Auerbach JD, Estreicher MB, Kean KE. Thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation: the learning curve and evolution in technique in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2009;2:2158–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cahill PJ, Pahys JM, Asghar J, et al. The effect of surgeon experience on outcomes of surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 2014;2:1333–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Reames DL, Smith JS, Fu K-MG, et al. Complications in the surgical treatment of 19,360 cases of pediatric scoliosis: a review of the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality database. Spine 2011;2:1484–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohamad F, Parent S, Pawelek J, et al. Perioperative complications after surgical correction in neuromuscular scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2007;2:392–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coe JD, Arlet V, Donaldson W, et al. Complications in spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the new millennium. A report of the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Spine 2006;2:345–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Patil CG, Santarelli J, Lad SP, Ho C, Tian W, Boakye M. Inpatient complications, mortality, and discharge disposition after surgical correction of idiopathic scoliosis: a national perspective. Spine J 2008;2:904–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Herwaldt LA, Cullen JJ, Scholz D, et al. A prospective study of outcomes, healthcare resource utilization, and costs associated with postoperative nosocomial infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;2:1291–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sponseller PD, LaPorte DM, Hungerford MW, Eck K, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG. Deep wound infections after neuromuscular scoliosis surgery: a multicenter study of risk factors and treatment outcomes. Spine 2000;2:2461–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sponseller PD, Shah SA, Abel MF, Newton PO, Letko L, Marks M. Infection rate after spine surgery in cerebral palsy is high and impairs results: multicenter analysis of risk factors and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;2:711–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Glassman SD, Carreon LY, Djurasovic M, et al. RhBMP-2 versus iliac crest bone graft for lumbar spine fusion: a randomized, controlled trial in patients over sixty years of age. Spine 2008;2:2843–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Djurasovic M, et al. RhBMP-2 versus iliac crest bone graft for lumbar spine fusion in patients over 60 years of age: a cost-utility study. Spine 2009;2:238–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bohl DD, Russo GS, Basques BA, et al. Variations in data collection methods between national databases affect study results: a comparison of the nationwide inpatient sample and national surgical quality improvement program databases for lumbar spine fusion procedures. J Bone Joint Surg 2014;96:e193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. AHRQ Quality Control. Available at: http://www. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/quality.jsp#procedures. Accessed December 13, 2014.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baron S. Lonner MD.

Additional information

The authors have no copyrighted material to report.

The authors attest that appropriate institutional IRB approval was obtained for this study.

No funding sources were obtained for this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paul, J.C., Lonner, B.S., Vira, S. et al. High-Volume Hospitals and Surgeons Experience Fewer Early Reoperation Events After Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery. Spine Deform 3, 496–501 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2015.03.005

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2015.03.005

Keywords

Navigation