Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Focused Molding Using Adhesive Pads in Mehta Casting for Early-Onset Scoliosis

  • Biomechanics
  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study Design

Prospective clinical series.

Objective

To determine the effect of adhesive pads placed over the apex of scoliosis curves on curve correction 1) after the first cast and 2) after the final cast.

Summary of Background Data

Early-onset scoliosis is often effectively managed by serial casting. Properly localizing the apex of the molds with the cast in place is challenging. The authors explored the effectiveness of a novel technique: incorporation of adhesive pads placed over the major curve apex before Mehta casting.

Methods

The 27 patients who received body casts (2000–2013) were divided into 2 groups: those without and with apical adhesive pads (5–6 layers of pads placed on the major curve’s apex during casting): non-pad (NP) group (n = 12) and pad (P) group (n = 15), respectively. Groups were compared regarding the percentage of Cobb angle change from the first cast and curve correction to a Cobb angle of <25° with Student t and chi-square tests (significance was p <.05).

Results

The mean percentage of major first-cast curve correction was 39% ± 18% and 56% ± 17% in the NP and P groups, respectively. Of the 26 patients out of a cast, 11 (42%) had a Cobb angle of < 25°: 3 (25%) and 8 (57%) in the NP and P groups, respectively. The mean differences between the 2 groups in percentage of major curve correction and this Cobb angle correction were significant: p =.023 and.005, respectively.

Conclusion

Adhesive pads placed over major curve(s) during Mehta casting were effective in increasing the amount of major curve correction from the first cast for idiopathic early-onset scoliosis and in decreasing curves to <25° at final follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dickson RA. Early-onset idiopathic scoliosis. In: Weinstein SL, editor. The pediatric spine: principles and practice. New York: Raven Press; 1994. p. 421–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fletcher ND, Bruce RW. Early onset scoliosis: current concepts and controversies. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2012;5:102–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gillingham BL, Fan RA, Akbarnia BA. Early onset idiopathic scoliosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2006;14:101–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bess S, Akbarnia BA, Thompson GH, et al. Complications of growing-rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis: analysis of one hundred and forty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92:2533–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Risser JC. Scoliosis treated by cast correction and spine fusion: a long term follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976;116:86–94.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mehta MH. Growth as a corrective force in the early treatment of progressive infantile scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:1237–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cotrel Y, Morel G [The elongation-derotation-flexion technic in the correction of scoliosis]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1964;50:59–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Szymanski DA, et al. Prevalence of neural axis abnormalities in patients with infantile idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84:2230–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Waldron SR, Poe-Kochert C, Son-Hing JP, et al. Early onset scoliosis: the value of serial risser casts. J Pediatr Orthop 2013;33:775–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. James JIP, Lloyd-Roberts GC, Pilcher MF. Infantile structural scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1959;41:719–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Campbell Jr RM, Smith MD, Mayes TC, et al. The characteristics of thoracic insufficiency syndrome associated with fused ribs and congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:399–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Baulesh DM, Huh J, Judkins T, et al. The role of serial casting in early-onset scoliosis (EOS). J Pediatr Orthop 2012;32:658–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sanders JO, D’Astous J, Fitzgerald M, et al. Derotational casting for progressive infantile scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2009;29:581–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D’Astous JL, Sanders JO. Casting and traction treatment methods for scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 2007;38:477–84. v.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fletcher ND, McClung A, Rathjen KE, et al. Serial casting as a delay tactic in the treatment of moderate-to-severe early-onset scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2012;32:664–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Halanski MA, Harper BL, Cassidy JA, et al. Three solutions to a single problem: alternative casting frames for treating infantile idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2013;26:274–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul D. Sponseller MD, MBA.

Additional information

Author disclosures: RA (none); PS (personal fees from J Bone Joint Surg grants and personal fees from DePuy Synthes Spine; personal fees from Globus and Oakstone Medical Publications, outside the submitted work).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abraham, R., Sponseller, P.D. Focused Molding Using Adhesive Pads in Mehta Casting for Early-Onset Scoliosis. Spine Deform 2, 454–459 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2014.03.006

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2014.03.006

Keywords

Navigation