Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Intrathecal Anomalies in Presumed Infantile Idiopathic Scoliosis: When Is MRI Necessary?

  • Biomechanics
  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study Design

Retrospective review.

Objective

To determine the rate of abnormal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients with presumed infantile idiopathic scoliosis (IIS) and the rate of neurosurgical intervention in those patients, and to develop a guideline concerning when to obtain an MRI.

Summary of Background Data

The reported rate of intrathecal anomalies associated with presumed IIS varies in the literature (12% to 50%). Conclusions have led to conflicting recommendations concerning when an MRI is indicated.

Methods

After appropriate internal review board approval, the authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients from a single institution meeting the inclusion criteria: presumed idiopathic curve with a magnitude of 3=20°, age <36 months at diagnosis, normal neurologic examination, and presentation between 2002 and 2010. The authors reviewed the MRI findings, whether neurosurgical intervention took place, and the orthopedic treatment course (observation, brace, cast, or surgery).

Results

A total of 56 patients were identified and reviewed; 43 had had an MRI. Seven of 43 patients were found to have an anomaly (16.2%). A fatty filum was identified in 2 patients, a syrinx in 3, Chiari I malformation in 2, and a tethered cord in 1 (this patient also had a syrinx). Two of the 7 patients required neurosurgical intervention (28%). Patients who did not have an MRI were statistically younger, had smaller Cobb angles, and required less orthopedic treatment.

Conclusions

The incidence of intrathecal anomalies (16.2%) at the authors’ institution was similar to previously published reports; however, the need for neurosurgical intervention was significantly lower in this study (28%). For younger patients with small curves ( < 30°) who do not require orthopedic treatment, MRI under sedation can be delayed or avoided. Clinical judgment should be the determinant for whether to use MRI when evaluating patients with presumed IIS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Winter RB, Lonstein JE, Heithoff KB, Kirkham JA. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the adolescent patient with idiopathic scoliosis before spinal instrumentation and fusion: a prospective, double-blinded study of 140 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997;22:855–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Do T, Fras C, Burke S, Widmann RF, et al. Clinical value of routine preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study of three hundred and twenty-seven patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83:577–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pahys JM, Samdani AF, Betz RR. Intraspinal anomalies in infantile idiopathic scoliosis: prevalence and role of magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:E434–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lewonowski K, King JD, Nelson MD. Routine use of magnetic resonance imaging in idiopathic scoliosis patients less than eleven years of age. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1992;17:S109–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gupta P, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH. Incidence of neural axis abnormalities in infantile and juvenile patients with spinal deformity: is a magnetic resonance image screening necessary? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998;23:206–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Evans SC, Edgar MA, Hall-Craggs MA, et al. MRI of ‘idiopathic’ juvenile scoliosis: a prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:314–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Szymanski DA, et al. Prevalence of neural axis abnormalities in patients with infantile idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84:2230–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ouellet JA, LaPlaza J, Erickson MA, et al. Sagittal plane deformity in the thoracic spine: a clue to the presence of syringomyelia as a cause of scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:2147–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mehta MH. Growth as a corrective force in the early treatment of progressive infantile scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:1237–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Koç T, Lam KS, Webb JK. Are intraspinal anomalies in early onset idiopathic scoliosis as common as once thought? A two centre United Kingdom study. Eur Spine J 2013;22:1250–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mehta MH. The rib-vertebra angle in the early diagnosis between resolving and progressive infantile scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1972;54:230–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bong CL, Allen JC, Kim JT. The effects of exposure to general anesthesia in infancy on academic performance at age 12. Anesth Analg 2013;117:1419–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. DiMaggio C, Sun LS, Kakavouli A, et al. A retrospective cohort study of the association of anesthesia and hernia repair surgery with behavioral and developmental disorders in young children. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2009;21:286–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. DiMaggio C, Sun LS, Li G. Early childhood exposure to anesthesia and risk of developmental and behavioral disorders in a sibling birth cohort. Anesth Analg 2011;113:1143–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schijman E, Steinbok P. International survey on the management of Chiari I malformation and syringomyelia. Childs Nerv Syst 2004;20:341–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. [16] Benglis Jr D, Covington D, Bhatia R, et al. Outcomes in pediatric patients with Chiari malformation Type I followed up without surgery. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2011;7:375–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rocque BG, George TM, Kestle J, Iskandar BJ. Treatment practices for Chiari malformation type I with syringomyelia: results of a survey of the American Society of Pediatric Neurosurgeons. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2011;8:430–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Colombo LF, Motta F. Consensus conference on Chiari: a malformation or an anomaly? Scoliosis and others orthopaedic deformities related to Chiari 1 malformation. Neurol 000 2011;32 (suppl 3):S341–3.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Krieger MD, Falkinstein Y, Bowen IE, et al. Scoliosis and Chiari malformation Type I in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2011;7:25–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yeom JS, Lee CK, Park KW, et al. Scoliosis associated with syringomyelia: analysis of MRI and curve progression. Eur Spine J 2007;16:1629–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Riseborough EJ, Wynne-Davies R. A genetic survey of idiopathic scoliosis in Boston, Massachusetts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973;55:974–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. McMaster MJ. Infantile idiopathic scoliosis: can it be prevented? J Bone Joint Surg Br 1983;65:612–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Children’s National Medical Center, 111 Michigan Avenue, Washington, DC, 20010, USA

    Benjamin D. Martin MD

  2. Texas Scottish Rite Hospital, 2222 Welborn Street, Dallas, TX, 75219, USA

    Anna McClung RN & Charles E. Johnston MD

  3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 2017, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA

    Jaime R. Denning MD

  4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gillette Children’s Specialty Healthcare, 200 University Avenue East, Saint Paul, MN, 55101, USA

    Jennifer C. Laine MD

Authors
  1. Benjamin D. Martin MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anna McClung RN
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jaime R. Denning MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jennifer C. Laine MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Charles E. Johnston MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles E. Johnston MD.

Additional information

Author disclosures: BDM (none); AM (none); JRD (none); JCL (none); CEJ (none).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martin, B.D., McClung, A., Denning, J.R. et al. Intrathecal Anomalies in Presumed Infantile Idiopathic Scoliosis: When Is MRI Necessary?. Spine Deform 2, 444–447 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2014.03.003

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2014.03.003

Keywords

Search

Navigation