Abstract
Study Design
A retrospective, single-center review of all spinal deformity surgeries at the authors’ institution.
Objectives
To determine the most sensitive physical examination finding as a test for motor deficits after spinal deformity surgery.
Background
Despite both reported false negatives of neuromonitoring and the potential for development of delayed deficits, the literature has paid relatively little attention to the postoperative evaluation and monitoring of neurologic integrity after correction of spinal deformity.
Methods
A retrospective, single-center review of 1,274 consecutive spinal deformity surgeries from 2003 to 2011 was performed. Patients with limited neurologic function or an inability to undergo an examination preoperatively were excluded. A total of 1,023 patients were included in the analysis. Records were analyzed for postoperative motor deficit.
Results
A total of 12 patients had a motor deficit in the perioperative period. Eight had a deficit on the immediate postoperative exam; 6 had absent ankle dorsiflexion and 2 had weak ankle dorsiflexion; And 4 developed a delayed motor deficit: 3 with absent ankle dorsiflexion and 1 with weak ankle dorsiflexion. There were no cases of a motor deficit in which ankle dorsiflexion was not weak or absent. Of the 12 patients with a deficit, 8 had complete loss of motor function. Of the 4 patients with incomplete neurologic injury, loss of ankle dorsiflexion was the only common physical examination finding. In this review, ankle dorsiflexion was 100% sensitive (12 of 12) and 100% specific (1,011 of 1,011) for neurologic injury.
Conclusions
Ankle dorsiflexion was the most sensitive test for lower extremity motor function after spinal deformity surgery, both for immediate and delayed deficits. Without testing ankle dorsiflexion specifically, neurologic motor deficits may be missed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
MacEwen GD, Bunnell WP, Sriram K. Acute neurological complications in the treatment of scoliosis: a report of the Scoliosis Research Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975;57:404–8.
Winter RB. Neurologic safety in spinal deformity surgery. Spine (PhilaP a 1976) 1997;22:1527–33.
Coe JD, Arlet V, Donaldson W, et al. Complications in spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the new millennium: a report of the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Spine 2006;31:345–9.
Naito M, Owen JH, Bridwell KH, Sugioka Y. Effects of distraction on physiologic integrity of the spinal cord, spinal cord blood flow, and clinical status. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1992;17:1154–8.
Othman Z, Lenke LG, Bolon SM, Padberg A. Hypotension-induced loss of intraoperative monitoring data during surgical correction of Scheuermann kyphosis: a case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:E258–65.
Thuet ED, Winscher JC, Padberg AM, et al. Validity and reliability of intraoperative monitoring in pediatric spinal deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35:1880–6.
Vazuelle C, Stagnara P, Jouvinroux P. Functional monitoring of spinal cord activity during spinal surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1973;93:173–8.
Nash Jr CL, Lorig RA, Schatzinger LA, Brown RH. Spinal monitoring during operative treatment of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977;126:100–5.
Pahys JM, Guille JT, D’Andrea LP, et al. Neurologic injury in the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis: guidelines for assessment and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2009;17:426–34.
Dormans JP. Establishing a standard of care for neuromonitoring during spinal deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35:2180–5.
Hoppenfeld S, Gross A, Andrews C, Lonner B. The ankle clonus test for assessment of the integrity of the spinal cord during operations for scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:208–12.
Padberg AM, Wilson-Holden TJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH. Somatosensory and motor evoked potentials monitoring without a wake up test during idiopathic scoliosis surgery: an accepted standard of care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998;23:1392–400.
Wilson-Holden TJ, Van Sickle D, Lenke L. The benefit of neurogenic mixed potentials for intraoperative spinal cord monitoring during correction of severe scoliosis: a case study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:E258–65.
Hoppenfeld S. Orthopaedic neurology: a diagnostic guide to neurologic levels. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott; 1977.
Perry J, Burnfield JM. Gait analysis: normal and pathologic function. 2nd ed. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Incorporated; 2010.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Author disclosures: LA (none); KL (none); DLS (grant from OREF; consulting fee/honorarium from Biomet, Medtronic, BeachBody LLC; expert testimony for medical malpractice cases [< 5% of income], payment for lectures including service on speakers bureaus from Biomet, Medtronic, Stryker; royalties from Biomet and Medtronic; institutional support from Medtronic, patent for Biomet [osteotome]).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andras, L., Louie, K. & Skaggs, D.L. Weak or Absent Ankle Dorsiflexion: The Most Sensitive Indicator of Motor Deficits Following Spinal Deformity Surgery. Spine Deform 2, 198–202 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2014.02.002
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2014.02.002