Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Metabolic Effects of Angulation, Compression, and Reduced Mobility on Annulus Fibrosis in a Model of Altered Mechanical Environment in Scoliosis

  • Biomechanic
  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study Design

: Comparison of disc tissue from rat tails in 6 groups with different mechanical conditions imposed. p ]Objectives: To identify disc annulus changes associated with the supposed altered biomechanical environment in a spine with scoliosis deformity using an immature rat model that produces disc narrowing and wedging.

Background

Intervertebral discs become wedged and narrowed in a scoliosis curve, probably partly because of an altered biomechanical environment.

Methods

We subjected tail discs of 5-week-old immature Sprague-Dawley rats to an altered mechanical environment using an external apparatus applying permutations of loading and deformity for 5 weeks. Together with a sham and a control group, we studied 4 groups of rats: A) 15° angulation, B) angulation with 0.1 MPa compression, C) 0.1 MPa compression, and R) reduced mobility. We measured disc height changes and matrix composition (water, deoxyribonucleic acid, glycosaminoglycan, and hyaluronic acid content) after 5 weeks, and proline and sulphate incorporation and messenger ribonucleic acid expression at 5 days and 5 weeks.

Results

After 5 weeks, disc space was significantly narrowed relative to internal controls in all 4 intervention groups. Water content and cellularity (deoxyribonucleic acid content) were not different at interventional levels relative to internal controls and not different between the concave and convex sides of the angulated discs. There was increased glycosaminoglycan content in compressed tissue (in Groups B and C), as expected, and compression resulted in a decrease in hyaluronic acid size. We observed slightly increased incorporation of tritiated proline into the concave side of angulated discs and compressed discs. Asymmetries of gene expression in Groups A and B and some group-wise differences did not identify consistent patterns associating the discs’ responses to mechanical alterations.

Conclusions

Intervertebral discs in this model underwent substantial narrowing after 5 weeks, with minimal alteration in tissue composition and minimal evidence of metabolic changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Modi HN, Suh SW, Song HR, et al. Differential wedging of vertebral body and intervertebral disc in thoracic and lumbar spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis-A cross sectional study in 150 patients. Scoliosis 2008;3:11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Will RE, Stokes IA, Qiu X, et al. Cobb angle progression in adolescent scoliosis begins at the intervertebral disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:2782–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stokes IAF, McBride C, Aronsson DD, Roughley PJ. Intervertebral disc changes with angulation, compression and reduced mobility simulating altered mechanical environment in scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2011;20:1735–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ching CT, Chow DH, Yao FY, Holmes AD. The effect of cyclic compression on the mechanical properties of the inter-vertebral disc: an in vivo study in a rat tail model. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2003;18:182–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Iatridis JC, Mente PL, Stokes IAF, et al. Compression induced changes to intervertebral disc properties in a rat tail model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:996–1002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lai A, Chow DH, Siu SW, et al. Effects of static compression with different loading magnitudes and durations on the intervertebral disc: an in vivo rat-tail study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:2721–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. MacLean JJ, Lee CR, Grad S, et al. Effects of immobilization and dynamic compression on intervertebral disc cell gene expression in vivo. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:973–81.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wuertz K, Godburn K, MacLean JJ, et al. In vivo remodeling of intervertebral discs in response to short- and long-term dynamic compression. J Orthop Res 2009;27:1235–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hulse Neufeld J, Haghighi P, Machado T. Growth related increase in rat intervertebral disc size: a quantitative radiographic and histologic comparison. Lab Anim Sci 1990;40:303–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Harlan Laboratories. Sprague-Dawley outbred rat. Available at: http://www.harlan.com/products_and_services/research_models_and_services/research_models/sprague_dawley_outbred_rat.hl. Accessed 15th November 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Roach HI, Mehta G, Oreffo RO, et al. Temporal analysis of rat growth plates: cessation of growth with age despite presence of a physis. J Histochem Cytochem 2003;51:373–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stokes IA, Aronsson DD, Dimock AN, et al. Endochondral growth in growth plates of three species at two anatomical locations modulated by mechanical compression and tension. J Orthop Res 2006;24:1327–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Farndale RW, Buttle DJ, Barrett AJ. Improved quantitation and discrimination of sulphated glycosaminoglycans by use of dimethyl-methylene blue. Biochim Biophys Acta 1986;883:173–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Durigova M, Roughley PJ, Mort JS. Mechanism of proteoglycan aggregate degradation in cartilage stimulated with oncostatin M. Osteoarthritis Cart 2008;16:98–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Barbir A, Godburn KE, Michalek AJ, et al. Effects of torsion on intervertebral disc gene expression and biomechanics, using a rat tail model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:607–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Miyazaki T, Kobayashi S, Takeno K, et al. A phenotypic comparison of proteoglycan production of intervertebral disc cells isolated from rats, rabbits, and bovine tails: which animal model is most suitable to study tissue engineering and biological repair of human disc disorders? Tissue Eng Part A 2009;15:3835–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bushell GR, Ghosh DP, Taylor TK, et al. The effect of spinal fusion on the collagen and proteoglycans of the canine intervertebral disc. J Surg Res 1978;25:61–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cole TC, Ghosh P, Hannan NJ, et al. The response of the canine intervertebral disc to immobilization produced by spinal arthrodesis is dependent on constitutional factors. J Orthop Res 1987;5:337–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cole TC, Burkhardt D, Ghosh P, et al. Effects of spinal fusion on the proteoglycans of the canine intervertebral disc. J Orthop Res 1985;3:277–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Videman T. Connective tissue and immobilization: key factors in musculoskeletal degeneration? Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987;(221):26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yilgor C, Demirkiran G, Ayvaz M, Yazici M. Is expansion thoracoplasty a safe procedure for mobility and growth potential of the spine? Spontaneous fusion after multiple chest distractions in young children. J Pediatr Orthop 2012;32:483–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Oegema Jr TR, Bradford DS, Cooper KM, Hunter RE. Comparison of the biochemistry of proteoglycans isolated from normal, idiopathic scoliotic and cerebral palsy spines. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983;8(4):378–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Antoniou J, Arlet V, Goswami T, et al. Elevated synthetic activity in the convex side of scoliotic intervertebral discs and endplates compared with normal tissues. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:E198–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rajasekaran S, Vidyadhara S, Subbiah M, et al. ISSLS prize winner: a study of effects of in vivo mechanical forces on human lumbar discs with scoliotic disc as a biological model: results from serial postcon-trast diffusion studies, histopathology and biochemical analysis of twenty-one human lumbar scoliotic discs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35:1930–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Roberts S, Menage J, Eisenstein SM. The cartilage end-plate and intervertebral disc in scoliosis: calcification and other sequelae. J Orthop Res 1993;11:747–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Laffosse JM, Odent T, Accadbled F, et al. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of vertebral end-plate trabecular bone changes in a porcine asymmetric vertebral tether. J Orthop Res 2010;28:232–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. MacLean JJ, Lee CR, Alini M, Iatridis JC. Anabolic and catabolic mRNA levels of the intervertebral disc vary with the magnitude and frequency of in vivo dynamic compression. J Orthop Res 2004;22:1193–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kroeber MW, Unglaub F, Wang H, et al. New in vivo animal model to create intervertebral disc degeneration and to investigate the effects of therapeutic strategies to stimulate disc regeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:2684–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Neufeld JH. Induced narrowing and back adaptation of lumbar intervertebral discs in biomechanically stressed rats. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1992;17:811–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lotz JC, Colliou OK, Chin JR, et al. Compression-induced degeneration of the intervertebral disc: an in vivo mouse model and finite-element study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998;23:2493–506.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Court C, Colliou OK, Chin JR, et al. The effect of static in vivo bending on the murine intervertebral disc. Spine J 2001;1:239–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian A. F. Stokes PhD.

Additional information

Author disclosures: IAFS (grant from National Institutes of Health [NIH] R01 AR 052132; support for travel to meetings for the study from NIH R01 AR 052132; consultancy for Kspine, Inc.); CM (grant from NIH R01 AR 052132); DDA (grant from NIH R01 AR 052132); PJR (none).

This work is supported by Grant R01 AR 052132 from the National institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. Haddon Pantel provided technical support.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stokes, I.A.F., McBride, C.A., Aronsson, D.D. et al. Metabolic Effects of Angulation, Compression, and Reduced Mobility on Annulus Fibrosis in a Model of Altered Mechanical Environment in Scoliosis. Spine Deform 1, 161–170 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2013.02.001

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2013.02.001

Keywords

Navigation