Abstract
This paper is an empirical application of the micro-founded measure of trade costs by Head and Mayer (2004) and Novy (2013). The derived micro-founded measure, consistent with the Ricardian and heterogeneous firm’s models of trade, captures all trade costs components that hitherto have been impossible to include in the gravity framework because of severe data limitations and the impracticability of measuring some of the trade cost components.
Based on bilateral trade and production data from the Trade, Production, and Protection database by Nicita and Olarreaga (2007) over the period 1980–2003, the micro-founded estimate of relative bilateral trade cost measure computed for ECOWAS clearly indicates lower trade costs among member ECOWAS countries compared with that for trade with other countries from SSA. With regard to accounting for variations in the computed measure of trade costs, the estimates obtained support the literature on the contribution of trade cost proxies to trade costs. Common non-tariff trade costs proxies explain over two-thirds of the variation in the trade costs estimates obtained for trade within the ECOWAS sub-region.
This paper argues for the need for policy makers within the sub-region to identify and reduce the trade barriers associated with trading within the ECOWAS sub-region. In addition, results from this paper, that bilateral transactions in a common currency reduces trade costs, suggest that current efforts at establishing a common currency, if successful, may improve intra-ECOWAS trade.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alaba, O.B., 2006. EU-ECOWAS EPA: regional integration, trade facilitation and development in West Africa. Draft Paper for Presentation at the GTAP Conference. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Alesina, A., Barro, R.J., Tenreyro, S., 2002. In: Gertler, M., Rogoff, K. (Eds.), Optimal currency areas. (NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2002). vol. 17. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 301–345.
Anderson, J.E., 1979. Theoretical foundation of the gravity equation. Am. Econ. Rev. 69 (1), 106–116.
Anderson, J.E., van Wincoop, E., 2003. Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. Am. Econ. Rev. 93 (1), 170–192.
Anderson, J.E., van Wincoop, E., 2004. Trade costs. J. Econ. Lit. 42 (3), 691–751.
Barro, R.J., Tenreyro, S., 2007. Economic effects of currency unions. Econ. Inq. 45 (1), 1–23.
Behar, A., Manners, P., 2008. Logistics and Exports, Mimeo, Oxford, CSAE WPS/2008–13.
Bergstrand, J., Egger, P., 2011. Gravity equations and economic frictions in the world economy. In: Bernhofen, Falvey, Greenaway, Kreickemier (Eds.), Palgrave Handbook of International Trade.
Bougheas, S., Demetriades, P., Morgenroth, E., 1999. Infrastructure, transport costs and trade. J. Int. Econ. 47, 169–189.
Chaney, T., 2008. Distorted gravity: the intensive and extensive margins of international trade. Am. Econ. Rev. 98, 1707–1721.
Clarke, X., Dollar, D., Micco, A., 2004. Port efficiency, maritime transport costs and bilateral trade. Cambridge, MA. NBER Working Paper No. 10353.
Djankov, S., Freund, C.L., Pham, C.S., 2006. Trading on time. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3909. The World Bank.
Eaton, J., Kortum, S., 2002. Technology, geography and trade. Econometrica 70 (5), 1741–1779.
Engel, C., 2002. Comment on Anderson and van Wincoop. In: Collins, Susan, Rodrik, Dani (Eds.), Brookings Trade Forum 2001. Brookings Institute, Washington.
Evans, C.L., 2003. The economic significance of national border effects. Am. Econ. Rev. 93 (4), 1291–1312.
Francois, J., Manchin, M., 2006. Institutional quality, infrastructure and propensity to export. Policy Research Working Paper No. 4152. World Bank.
Gould, D.M., 1994. Immigrant links to the home country: empirical implications for US bilateral trade flows. Rev. Econ. Stat. 76 (2), 302–316.
Head, K., Mayer, T., 2004. The empirics of agglomeration and trade. chapter 59 in the. In: Henderson, V., Thisse, J.F. (Eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. vol. 4.
Head, K., Ries, J., 1998. Immigration and trade creation: evidence from Canada. Can. J. Econ. 31 (1), 47–62.
Head, K., Ries, J., 2001. Increasing returns vs national product differentiation as an explanation for the pattern of US–Canada trade. Am. Econ. Rev. 91 (4), 858–876.
Hoekman, B., Nicita, A., 2008. Trade policy, trade costs and developing country trade. Policy Research Paper 4797. The World Bank Development Research Group.
Hummels, D., 1999. Toward a geography of trade costs, center for global trade analysis. GTAP Working Papers 1162. Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
Jacks, D.S., Meissner, C.M., Novy, D., 2008. Trade costs, 1870–2000. Am. Econ. Rev. Pap. Proc. 98 (2), 529–534.
Limao, N., Venables, A.J., 2001. Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport costs and trade. World Bank Econ. Rev. 15, 451–479.
Mbabazi, J., Milner, C., Morrissey, O., 2006. Trade openness, trade costs and growth: why Sub-Saharan Africa performs poorly. CREDIT Research Paper 06/08. University of Nottingham.
McCallum, J., 1995. National Borders Matter: Canada–US regional trade patterns. Am. Econ. Rev. 85 (3), 615–623.
Melitz, M.J., Ottaviano, G.I.P., 2008. Market size, trade and productivity. Rev. Econ. Stud. 75, 295–316.
Nicita, A., Olarreaga, M., 2007. Trade, production and protection database: 1976–2004. World Bank Econ. Rev. 12 (1), 165–171.
Novy, D., 2013. Gravity redux: measuring international trade costs with panel data. Econ. Inq. 51 (1), 101–121 (January 2013).
Portes, R., Rey, H., 2005. The determinants of cross-border equity flows. J. Int. Econ. 65, 269–296.
Portugal-Perez, A., Wilson, J.S., 2008. Trade costs in Africa: barriers and opportunities for reform. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4619. The World Bank.
Rose, A.K., 2000. One money, one market: the effect of common currencies on trade. Econ. Policy 15 (30), 7–46.
Rose, A.K., van Wincoop, E., 2001. National money as a barrier to trade: the real case for currency union. Am. Econ. Rev. Pap. Proc. 91 (2).
Tinbergen, J., 1962. An analysis of world trade flows. In: Tinbergen (Ed.), Shaping the World Economy. Twentieth Century Fund, New York.
Turkson, F.E., 2011. Logistics and bilateral exports in developing countries: a multiplicative form estimation of the logistics augmented gravity equation. CREDIT Research Paper 11/06. University of Nottingham.
Turkson, F.E., 2012. Using observable trade data to measure bilateral trade costs in Sub-Saharan Africa. CREDIT Research Paper 12/06. University of Nottingham.
Wei, S., 1996. Intra-national versus inter-national trade: how stubborn are nations in global integration? NBER Working Paper 5531. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA
Wilson, J.S., Mann, C.L., Otsuki, T., 2004. Assessing the potential benefit of trade facilitation: a global perspective. World Bank Working Paper No. WPS 3224. The World Bank.
Wilson, J.S., Njinkeu, D., Fosso, B.P., 2008. Expanding trade within Africa: the impact of trade facilitation. Policy Research Paper 4790. The World Bank Development Research Group.
Yang, Y., Gupta, S., 2007. Regional trade arrangements in Africa: past performance and the way forward. Afr. Dev. Rev. 19 (3), 399–431.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Peer review under responsibility of Afreximbank.
Rights and permissions
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Turkson, F.E. How well does observable trade data measure trade friction costs? Evidence from member countries within the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). J Afr Trade 5, 69–86 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joat.2018.03.001
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joat.2018.03.001