Abstract
When mass spectrometry is not combined to separation techniques, the evaluation of signal and noise in a complex mass spectrum is not trivial. The tuning of the spectrometer based only on the increase of the signal of a selected number of m/z values does not ensure the achievement of the best experimental conditions: signal could improve and noise could increase as well. The scope of this work is the development of a function separating signal and noise (for evaluating the S/N) from complex mass spectra for potential use as target function for the automatic tuning of the instrument. Two different methods were applied: the first is based on the separation of a pool of m/z values attributable to the signal from the m/z values due to the noise, while the second is based on the application of principal component analysis to separate the signal (present in the significant components) from the noise (present in the residuals). The comparison of the two methods was carried out by the evaluation of the stability of the signal and the target functions obtained, and the evaluation of the variation of the target functions as a function of concentration.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
March, R. E. An Introduction to Quadrupole Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 1997, 32, 351–369.
Reemtsma, T. The Use of Liquid Chromatography-Atmospheric Pressure Ionization-Mass Spectrometry in Water Analysis, Part I: Achievements. Trends Anal. Chem. 2001, 20, 500–517.
Rosenberg, E. The Potential of Organic (Electrospray and Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization) Mass Spectrometric Techniques Coupled to Liquid-Phase Separation for Speciation Analysis. J. Chromatogr. A. 2003, 1000, 841–889.
Wong, P. S. H.; Cooks, R. G. Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry. Curr. Sep. 1997, 16, 85–92.
Finnigan LCQDuo-Getting Started Guide, Revision A. ThermoQuest: 1999.
MSD Analytical Technologies Analyst Software-Getting Started Guide. Applied Biosystems. 2008.
Millennium32 ZQ Mass Detector Software-Getting Started Guide. Waters. 2001.
Rogatsky, E.; Stein, D. Automated Optimization of Mass Spectrometric Parameters in Tune Mode for Impure Analytes in Dirty Samples Using Gradient High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 19, 3759–3760.
Moini, M. Ultramark-1621 as a Calibration Reference Compound for Mass-Spectrometry. 2: Positive-Ion and Negative-Ion Electrospray-Ionization. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1994, 8, 711–714.
Moini, M.; Jones, B. L.; Rogers, R. M.; Jiang, L. Sodium Trifluoroacetate as a Tune/Calibration Compound for Positive and Negative-Ion Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry in the Mass Range of 100–4000 Da. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 9, 977–980.
Massart, D. L.; Vanderginste, B. G. M.; Deming, S. M.; Michotte, Y.; Kaufman, L. Chemometrics: A Textbook; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1988.
Vanderginste, B. G. M.; Massart, D. L.; Buydens, L. M. C.; De Jong, S.; Lewi, P. J.; Smeyers-Verbeke, J. Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics: Part A; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Published online July 1, 2009
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marengo, E., Robotti, E., Gosetti, F. et al. Evaluation of signal and noise and identification of a suitable target function in the tuning of an ESI ion trap mass spectrometer by multivariate pattern recognition tools. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 20, 1859–1867 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2009.06.011
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2009.06.011