Abstract
This study describes a new algorithm for charge state determination of complex isotope-resolved mass spectra. This algorithm is based on peak-target Fourier transform (PTFT) of isotope packets. It is modified from the widely used Fourier transform method because Fourier transform may give ambiguous charge state assignment for low signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) or overlapping isotopic clusters. The PTFT algorithm applies a novel “folding” strategy to enhance peaks that are symmetrically spaced about the targeted peak before applying the FT. The “folding” strategy multiplies each point to the high-m/z side of the targeted peak by its counterpart on the low-m/z side. A Fourier transform of this “folded” spectrum is thus simplified, emphasizing the charge state of the “chosen” ion, whereas ions of other charge states contribute less to the transformed data. An intensity-dependent technique is also proposed for charge state determination from frequency signals. The performance of PTFT is demonstrated using experimental electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectra. The results show that PTFT is robust for charge state determination of low S/N and overlapping isotopic clusters, and also useful for manual verification of potential hidden isotopic clusters that may be missed by the current analysis algorithms, i.e., AID-MS or THRASH.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fenn, J. B.; Mann, M.; Meng, C. K.; Wong, S. F.; Whitehouse, C. M. Electrospray Ionization Principles and Practice. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1990, 9, 37–70.
Aebersold, R.; Goodlett, D. R. Mass Spectrometry in Proteomics. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 269–296.
Palmblad, M.; Bujis, J.; Hakansson, P. Automatic Analysis of Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectra of Peptides and Proteins Using calculations of isotopic distributions. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 12, 1153–1162.
Pandey, A.; Mann, M. Proteomics to Study Genes and Genomes. Nature. 2000, 405, 837–846.
Senko, M. W.; Beu, S. C.; McLafferty, F. W. Automated Assignment of Charge States from Resolved Isotopic Peaks for Multiply Charged Ions. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1995, 6, 52–56.
Tabb, D. L.; Shah, M. B.; Strader, M. B.; Connelly, H. M.; Hettich, R. L.; Hurst, G. B. Determination of Peptide and Protein Ion Charge States by Fourier Transformation of Isotope-Resolved Mass Spectra. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2006, 17, 903–915.
Chen, L.; Sze, S. K.; Yang, H. Automated Intensity Descent Algorithm for Interpretation of Complex High-Resolution Mass Spectra. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 5006–5018.
Senko, M. W.; Beu, S. C.; McLafferty, F. M. Determination of Monoisotopic Masses and Ion Populations for Large Biomolecules from Resolved Isotopic Distributions. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1995, 6, 229–233.
Marshall, A. G.; Hendrickson, C. L.; Jackson, G. S. Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry: A Primer. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1998, 17, 1–35.
Makarov, A.; Denisov, E.; Kholomeev, A.; Balschun, W.; Lange, O.; Strupat, K.; Horning, S. Performance Evaluation of a Hybrid Linear Ion Trap/Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 2113–2120.
Zhang, Z.; Marshall, A. G. A Universal Algorithm for Fast and Automated Charge State Deconvolution of Electrospray Mass-to-Charge Ratio Spectra. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 9, 225–233.
Horn, D. M.; Zubareu, R. A.; McLafferty, F. W. Automated Reduction and Interpretation of High Resolution Electrospray Mass Spectra of Large Molecules. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2000, 11, 320–332.
Sze, S. K.; Ge, Y.; Oh, H.; McLafferty, F. W. Plasma Electron capture Dissociation for the Characterization of Large Proteins by Top Down Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 1599–1603.
www.bii.a-star.edu.sg/paper/chenli
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Published online October 30, 2007
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, L., Yap, Y.L. Automated charge state determination of complex isotope-resolved mass spectra by peak-target Fourier transform. J. Am. Soc. Spectrom. 19, 46–54 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2007.10.015
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2007.10.015