Skip to main content
Log in

Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the very elderly

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

It is estimated that by 2050, there will be a 300% increase in the elderly population (=>65 years) and a cor-responding increase in elderly patients presenting for surgical evaluation. Surgical decision-making in this population can be difficult because outcomes in the elderly are poorly defined. We reviewed 2698 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies (PDs) at our institution over a 35-year period (April 1970 through March 2005), with the last 1000 resections being done in the last 4 years. Data collected in-cluded surgical indication, mortality (defined as 30-day or in-hospital mortality), complications, and sur-vival. Patients were divided by age into three groups (<80, 80 89, and =>90 years) and evaluated using multiple logistic regression. Two hundred seven patients =>80 years old underwent a PD (7.7% of 2698). Patients 80 89 years of age had a mortality rate of 4.1% (8 of 197) and a complication rate of 52.8% (99 of 197), whereas patients =<79 years of age had a mortality of 1.7% and a complication rate of 41.6% (P < 0.05). There were no perioperative deaths among the 10 patients =>90 years of age, and their com-plication rate was 50% (5 of 10). One-year survival for patients 80 89 years of age was 59.1%, and that for patients =>90 years was 60%. Age was not an independent risk factor for perioperative mortality and morbidity following PD after adjusting for preoperative comorbidities. We demonstrate that PD can be safely performed in patients over 80 years of age and conclude that age alone should not be a contrain-dication to pancreatic resection. The advent of improved surgical outcomes and an aging population will likely result in a significant increase in the number of PDs performed in the next few decades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson RN, DeTurk PB. United States Life Tables, 1999. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2002;50:33.

    Google Scholar 

  2. U.S. Department of Commerce, U.N. Department of Pub-lic Information. An Aging World 2001, DP/2264. March 2002.

  3. U.S. Census Bureau. Projections of the total resident popu-lation by 5-year age groups and sex with special age cate-gories: middle series 2025 to 2045, 2050 to 2070. Bethesda, MD; Population Projections Program, U.S. Cen-sus Bureau, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, et al. Births: final data for 2000. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2003;50.

  5. Etzioni DA, Liu JH, Maggard MA, Ko CY. The aging pop-ulation and its impact on the surgery workforce. Ann Surg 2003;238:170–177.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eiseman B. Surgical decision making and elderly patients. Bull Am Coll Surg 1996;81:8–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Williams DB, et al. Determinants of operative mortality in octogenarians undergoing coronary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:1038–1043.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Katz NM, Chase GA. Risks of cardiac operations for elderly patients: reduction of the age factor. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63:1309–1314.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sollano JA, Rose EA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of coronary artery bypass surgery in octogenarians. Ann Surg 1998;228:297–306.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nehler MR, Taylor LM, Moneta GL, Proter JM. Indications for operation for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms: current guidelines. Semin Vasc Surg 1995;8:108–114.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, et al. Should pancreatico-duodenectomy be performed in octogenarians? J GASTROINT-EST SURG 1998;2:207–216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, et al. Pancreaticoduode-nectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas. 201 patients. Ann Surg 1995;221:721–731.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al., eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002.

  14. Dimick JB, Diener-West M, Lipsett PA. Negative results of randomized clinical trials published in the surgical literature: equivalency or error? Arch Surg 2001;136:796–800.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rabeneck L, Davila JA, Thompson M, El-Serag HB. Out-comes in elderly patients following surgery for colorectal cancer in the Veterans Affairs health care system. R Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;5:1115–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Katai H, Sasako M, Sano T, Fukagawa T. Gastric cancer surgery in the elderly without operative mortality. Surg Oncol 2004;13:235–238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fukuse T, Satoda N, Hijiya K, Fujinaga T. Importance of a comprehensive geriatric assessment in prediction of complications following thoracic surgery in elderly patients. Chest 2005;127:886–891.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang JJ, Yeo CJ, Sohn TA, et al. Quality of life and outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 2000;231:890–898.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Brennan MF, Kattan MW, Klimstra D, Conlon K. Prog-nostic nomogram for patients undergoing resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg 2004;240:293–298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, for the Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol Med Sci 2001; 56A:M146-M156.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin A. Makary M.D., M.P.H..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Makary, M.A., Winter, J.M., Cameron, J.L. et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the very elderly. J Gastrointest Surg 10, 347–356 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.12.014

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.12.014

Key words

Navigation