Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term outcome of esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia or cancer found during surveillance for barrett’s esophagus

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Endoscopic surveillance is recommended for patients with Barrett’s esophagus to detect high-grade dys-plasia (HGD) or cancer. We studied the outcome of esophagectomy in a cohort of patients who devel-oped HGD or cancer between 1995 and 2003 while under surveillance for Barrett’s. Outcomes were measured by analysis of clinical records, symptom questionnaire, and SF-36 (version 2). In 34 patients, mean surveillance time was 48 months (range, 4–132); the mean number of endoscopies was 10 (range, 3–30). Preoperative diagnosis was HGD in 9 patients (26.5%), carcinoma in situ in 16 (47%), and ad-enocarcinoma in 9 (26.5%). There was no esophagectomy-related mortality; 10 patients (29%) had com-plications. At mean follow-up of 46 months (range, 13–108), SF-36 (version 2) results showed quality of life scores equal to or better than those of healthy individuals. Incidence and severity scores (VAS 1–10) for postoperative symptoms were reflux, 59% (2.8); dysphagia, 28% (3.7); bloating, 45% (2.6); nausea, 28% (2.1); and diarrhea, 55% (2.5). Twenty-nine patients (85%) have no clinical, radiographic, or en-doscopic evidence of recurrent esophageal cancer or metastasis. One patient has metastatic disease. En-doscopic surveillance in Barrett’s patients yields malignant lesions at an early, generally curable, stage. Esophagectomy is curative in the great majority and can be accomplished with minimal mortality and excellent quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Devesa SS, Blot WJ, Fraumeni JF Jr. Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States. Cancer 1998;83:2049–2053.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wu PC, Posner MC. The role of surgery in the management of oesophageal cancer. Lancet Oncol 2003;4:481–488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fernandez FG, Meyers BF. Quality of life after esophagec-tomy. Semin Thora Cardiovasc Surg 2004;16:152–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Spechler SJ. Barrett’s esophagus: what’s new and what to do. Am Gastroenterol 1989;84:220–223.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gopal DV, Lieberman DA, et al. Risk factors for dysplasia in patients with Barrett’s esophagus (BE): results from a multi-center consortium. Dig Dis Sci 2003;48:1537–1541.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Spechler SJ. Clinical practice. Barrett’s esophagus. N Engl J Med 2002;346:836–842.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pellegrini CA, Pohl D. High-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: surveillance or operation? J GASTROINTEST SURG 2000;4:131–134.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tytgat GN, Bartelink H, Bernards R, et al. Cancer of the esophagus and gastric cardia: recent advances. Dis Esopha-gus 2004;17:10–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jamieson GG, Mathew G, Ludemann R, Wayman J, Myers JC, Devitt PG. Postoperative mortality following oe-sophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate. Br J Surg 2004;91:943–947.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Dewey JE. How to score version two of the SF-36 health survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric, In-corporated, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reid BJ, Blount PL, Feng Z, Levine DS. Optimizing en-doscopic biopsy detection of early cancers in Barrett’s high-grade dysplasia. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95:3089–3096.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Gandek B, et al. The factor struc-ture of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assess-ment. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:1159–1165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dresner SM, Griffin SM, Wayman J, Bennett MK, Hayes N, Raimes SA. Human model of duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux in the development of Barrett’s metaplasia. Br J Surg 2003;90:1120–1128.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Aly A, Jamieson GG. Reflux after oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 2004;91:137–141.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brant K. Oelschlager M.D..

Additional information

This work was supported in part by the Mary and Dennis Wise Fund and in part by an educational grant from United States Surgical Corpo-ration, Tyco Healthcare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, L.C., Oelschlager, B.K., Quiroga, E. et al. Long-term outcome of esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia or cancer found during surveillance for barrett’s esophagus. J Gastrointest Surg 10, 341–346 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.12.007

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.12.007

Key words

Navigation