Abstract
Endoscopic surveillance is recommended for patients with Barrett’s esophagus to detect high-grade dys-plasia (HGD) or cancer. We studied the outcome of esophagectomy in a cohort of patients who devel-oped HGD or cancer between 1995 and 2003 while under surveillance for Barrett’s. Outcomes were measured by analysis of clinical records, symptom questionnaire, and SF-36 (version 2). In 34 patients, mean surveillance time was 48 months (range, 4–132); the mean number of endoscopies was 10 (range, 3–30). Preoperative diagnosis was HGD in 9 patients (26.5%), carcinoma in situ in 16 (47%), and ad-enocarcinoma in 9 (26.5%). There was no esophagectomy-related mortality; 10 patients (29%) had com-plications. At mean follow-up of 46 months (range, 13–108), SF-36 (version 2) results showed quality of life scores equal to or better than those of healthy individuals. Incidence and severity scores (VAS 1–10) for postoperative symptoms were reflux, 59% (2.8); dysphagia, 28% (3.7); bloating, 45% (2.6); nausea, 28% (2.1); and diarrhea, 55% (2.5). Twenty-nine patients (85%) have no clinical, radiographic, or en-doscopic evidence of recurrent esophageal cancer or metastasis. One patient has metastatic disease. En-doscopic surveillance in Barrett’s patients yields malignant lesions at an early, generally curable, stage. Esophagectomy is curative in the great majority and can be accomplished with minimal mortality and excellent quality of life.
References
Devesa SS, Blot WJ, Fraumeni JF Jr. Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States. Cancer 1998;83:2049–2053.
Wu PC, Posner MC. The role of surgery in the management of oesophageal cancer. Lancet Oncol 2003;4:481–488.
Fernandez FG, Meyers BF. Quality of life after esophagec-tomy. Semin Thora Cardiovasc Surg 2004;16:152–159.
Spechler SJ. Barrett’s esophagus: what’s new and what to do. Am Gastroenterol 1989;84:220–223.
Gopal DV, Lieberman DA, et al. Risk factors for dysplasia in patients with Barrett’s esophagus (BE): results from a multi-center consortium. Dig Dis Sci 2003;48:1537–1541.
Spechler SJ. Clinical practice. Barrett’s esophagus. N Engl J Med 2002;346:836–842.
Pellegrini CA, Pohl D. High-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: surveillance or operation? J GASTROINTEST SURG 2000;4:131–134.
Tytgat GN, Bartelink H, Bernards R, et al. Cancer of the esophagus and gastric cardia: recent advances. Dis Esopha-gus 2004;17:10–26.
Jamieson GG, Mathew G, Ludemann R, Wayman J, Myers JC, Devitt PG. Postoperative mortality following oe-sophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate. Br J Surg 2004;91:943–947.
Ware JE, Kosinski M, Dewey JE. How to score version two of the SF-36 health survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric, In-corporated, 2000.
Reid BJ, Blount PL, Feng Z, Levine DS. Optimizing en-doscopic biopsy detection of early cancers in Barrett’s high-grade dysplasia. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95:3089–3096.
Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Gandek B, et al. The factor struc-ture of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assess-ment. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:1159–1165.
Dresner SM, Griffin SM, Wayman J, Bennett MK, Hayes N, Raimes SA. Human model of duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux in the development of Barrett’s metaplasia. Br J Surg 2003;90:1120–1128.
Aly A, Jamieson GG. Reflux after oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 2004;91:137–141.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported in part by the Mary and Dennis Wise Fund and in part by an educational grant from United States Surgical Corpo-ration, Tyco Healthcare.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chang, L.C., Oelschlager, B.K., Quiroga, E. et al. Long-term outcome of esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia or cancer found during surveillance for barrett’s esophagus. J Gastrointest Surg 10, 341–346 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.12.007
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.12.007