Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic versus open colostomy reversal: A comparative analysis

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Open colostomy reversal carries significant rates of wound infection, anastomotic leak, and incisional hernia which often limit its acceptance. We hypothesized that the laparoscopic approach to the restoration of intestinal continuity may result in lower perioperative morbidity and faster postoperative recovery. Twenty-two cases of laparoscopic colostomy reversals performed at a single institution were identified and compared to 22 randomly selected open colostomy closures performed during the same time period. Patients were compared based on demographics, previous indications for colostomy procedures, and perioperative outcomes. A total of 152 patients underwent reversal of left-sided colostomies during the study period. The laparoscopic approach was successful in 20 of 22 cases; there were 2 conversions to open (9%) secondary to inability to adequately mobilize the rectal stump. The laparoscopic and open groups were comparable based on mean age (54 years versus 49 years; P=0.23), BMI (26 kg/m2 versus 27 kg/m2; P=0.66), gender (9% males versus 13% males; P=0.23), ASA Class (2.6 versus 2.3; P=0.07), and history of previous intra-abdominal sepsis (17 versus 16 cases). Operative times were similar (158 versus 189 minutes; P=0.16), and estimated blood loss was significantly less in the laparoscopic group (113 versus 270 ml; P=0.01). No intraoperative complications occurred in the laparoscopic group and two enterotomies occurred in the open group. The laparoscopic group had earlier passage of flatus (3.5 versus 5.0 days; P=0.001) and shorter hospitalization (4.2 versus 7.3 days; P=0.001). Perioperative complications occurred in 3 (14%) laparoscopic and 13 (59%) open cases (P=0.01). There was no mortality in this series. The laparoscopic approach can be safely used in the restoration of intestinal continuity. It results in a decreased perioperative morbidity and faster recovery, and it offers distinct advantages over the open approach to colostomy reversal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pearce NW, Scott SD, Karran SJ. Timing and method of reversal of Hartmann’s procedure. Br J Surg 1992;79:839–841.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Roe AM, Prabhu S, Ali A, Brown C, Brodribb AJ. Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: Timing and operative technique. Br J Surg 1991;78:1167–1170.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wigmore SJ, Duthie GS, Young IE, Spalding EM, Rainey JB. Restoration of intestinal continuity following Hartmann’s procedure: The Lothian experience 1987–1992. Br J Surg 1995;82:27–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Albarran SA, Simoens C, Takeh H, Mendes da Costa P. Restoration of digestive continuity after Hartmann’s procedure. Hepatogastroenterology 2004;51:1045–1049.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nugent KP, Daniels P, Stewart B, Patankar R, Johnson CD. Quality of life in stoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:1569–1574.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mylonakis E, Scarpa M, Barollo M, Yarnoz C, Keighley MR. Life table analysis of hernia following end colostomy construction. Colorectal Dis 2001;3:334–337.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson CA, Fowler DL, White S, Wintz N. Laparoscopic colostomy closure. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1993;3:69–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Costantino GN, Mukalian GG. Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann procedure. J Laparoendosc Surg 1994;4:429–433.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Delgado GF, Garcia Lozano A, Domingo del Pozo C, Grau Cardona E, Martin Delgado J. Laparoscopic reconstruction of intestinal continuity following Hartmann’s procedure. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 1998;90:499–502.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Holland JC, Winter DC, Richardson D. Laparoscopically assisted reversal of Hartmann’s procedure revisited. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002;12:291–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Macpherson SC, Hansell DT, Porteous C. Laparoscopic-assisted reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: A simplified technique and audit of twelve cases. J Laparoendosc Surg 1996;6:305–310.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Regadas FS, Siebra JA, Rodrigues LV, Nicodemo AM, Reis Neto JA. Laparoscopically assisted colorectal anastomose post-Hartmann’s procedure. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1996;6:1–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sosa JL, Sleeman D, Puente I, McKenney MG, Hartmann R. Laparoscopic-assisted colostomy closure after Hartmann’s procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:149–152.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vernava AM 3rd, Liebscher G, Longo WE. Laparoscopic restoration of intestinal continuity after Hartmann procedure. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1995;5:129–132.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Todd Heniford M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosen, M.J., Cobb, W.S., Kercher, K.W. et al. Laparoscopic versus open colostomy reversal: A comparative analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 10, 895–900 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.11.008

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.11.008

Key words

Navigation